idk is this something like the theoretical 500 mpg carburator where Weight Watchers purchased the patent for weight loss strategies and is keeping them hidden to insure continued $ub$cription money from chubby desperate moms?

feel free to discuss itt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2)#49513303)

- diagnosing the underlying issues which caused weight gain in the first place

- finding a plan that the individual person wants to stick to

"Calories In Calories Out" is an oversimplification but it is the Truth

also you're correct that the weight loss companies are incentivized to not provide permanent solutions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2)#49513311)

Lazy + rich = Ozempic

Active + rich = Ozempic or fitness.

Lazy + poor = fat

Active + poor = Exercise, calorie restriction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2)#49513316)

It just sucks to live at a caloric deficit so very few people do it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2)#49513330)

good talk tho thanks for the contribution👍

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2)#49513353)

People successfully lose weight doing all kinds of random goofy gimmicks. All that matters is caloric deficit. That's what's actually making them lose weight. You just have to Eat Less

But living at a caloric deficit sucks. You feel shitty. That's why people don't do it. Also they like eating. There are lots of people who try Ozempic and then quit because they prefer to eat and be fat than not eat and become skinny even if the drug makes them not feel shitty for being at a caloric deficit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2)#49513365)