The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| titillating house | 01/06/26 | | Lilac curious sneaky criminal party of the first part | 01/06/26 | | Mind-boggling pervert | 01/06/26 | | Lilac curious sneaky criminal party of the first part | 01/06/26 | | Mind-boggling pervert | 01/06/26 | | Lilac curious sneaky criminal party of the first part | 01/06/26 | | titillating house | 01/06/26 | | Lilac curious sneaky criminal party of the first part | 01/06/26 | | titillating house | 01/06/26 | | Low-t sanctuary | 01/07/26 | | Snowy gaping parlor | 01/06/26 | | unholy navy azn | 01/06/26 | | Mind-boggling pervert | 01/06/26 | | thriller half-breed newt | 01/06/26 | | Mind-boggling pervert | 01/06/26 | | Apoplectic property volcanic crater | 01/06/26 | | appetizing pontificating ratface area | 01/06/26 | | brindle shaky striped hyena headpube | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Lilac curious sneaky criminal party of the first part
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2)#49568134) |
|
|