At least the ones who use it to show a GAP then quietly smug...	Cracking Ticket Booth	12/20/25
Cr	submissive macaca becky	12/20/25

Date: December 20th, 2025 9:48 AM Author: Cracking Ticket Booth At least the ones who use it to show a GAP then quietly smuggle that gap into an ontological conclusion it doesn't warrant. At most the argument shows that first person phenomenal experience cannot be fully captured or exhausted. by third person physical language. That's the entire valid payload. Which really isn't much. But midwits and especially FAR LOWER than midwits try to use it to leap to claims like that qualia are non-physical or consciousness is ontologically fundamental, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812454&forum_id=2/#49524835)

Date: December 20th, 2025 9:52 AM Author: submissive macaca becky Cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812454&forum_id=2/#49524856)