apparently the judge met with the prosecutor (who works for Fani Willis's office, remember her?) and a witness without the defense present. someone leaked that information to the defense, which moved for a mistrial. the judge demanded to know who told the defense attorney about the meeting, and he refused. judge put him in jail.

any crimbros or shitlawyers able to defend what the judge did here? this seems absolutely crazy.

and wtf is wrong with this DA's office? head prosecutor hiring some dood she was fucking, now this. what kind of shit is going on in that office?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47736529)

are you, or are you not, a morbidly obese shitlawyer with a fat wife who doesn't fuck him?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47736622)

Glanville told him that he “does not have that luxury” and instructed Adams to remain in the courtroom and defend his client.

“You don’t get to extort the court,” Glanville said. “It doesn’t work that way.”

He called the leaked information about the meeting “such a violation of the sacrosanctness of the judge’s chambers.”

...

“You got the information in a way that was not lawful to begin with,” Glanville told him. “If and when the case gets reviewed, an appellate court will make these decisions.”

Schardt snapped back.

“All I’m asking for is some sunlight,” he said. “We’d like the transcript … We are trying this case right now to win this case. We are not playing for an appeal. We would like a fair shot at this case right now.”

Waiting for the appeals process to play out could take decades, Schardt contended.

Glanville said there was “nothing that was improper” about the ex parte conversation in his chambers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47736639)

Judge is forcing him to continue on in a trial without his first chair?

Id simply keep repeating, "I am not able at this time to adequately defend my client without Mr. Steele."

At each junction, when it comes time to cross-ex, etc., just sit there and repeat it. Judge cannot force you to do anything, and even if he allows the state to keep putting on a case, and they secure a verdict, it would be completely worthless.

Judge knows it, state knows it. That's the TRUMPcard d can play. Just refuse to do anything in defense, as you are "not prepared, not able".

Judge NEEDS an adequate defense for a legal verdict. Only you have the power to give any defense. Sit on your hands. Can't contempt you because you need your first-chair. "Judge Mr. Steele was assigned this witness, this argument, etc. I cannot do it adequately to defend my client."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47736829)

Shocking

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47736642)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJbJM5hG838

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47737145)

again, what do i know but i feel like this guy could be removed from the bench for this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47739997)

what happens to his jail sentence pending appeal>?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47741089)

https://youtu.be/rSLlGSbdvWU?si=3XVSYyenuhUN4QPk

At one point the black DA lady speaks and says they requested an ex parte hearing because it related to "a civil contempt matter" and not the criminal case. One weird trick!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5539355&forum_id=2/#47740343)