The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
CONTRACTS QUIZ (1L)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:16 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig Anyone feel like quizzing me on shit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26874917) |
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:17 PM Author: razzmatazz patrolman bawdyhouse When can you have liquidated damages? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26874933) |
 |
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:18 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig pretty sure there has to be clause (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26874937) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:18 PM Author: razzmatazz patrolman bawdyhouse Yeah, but when will the clause be upheld? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26874944) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:19 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig 1) agreed by both parties at time of k
2) established what damages are reasonably foreseeable
am i missing anything? |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:23 PM Author: razzmatazz patrolman bawdyhouse I guess that probably works. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26874987) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:20 PM Author: mint faggotry A offers B 1200 widgets FOB. B agrees to COD. Enroute a terrorist blows up the ship it is sent on.
Does B have to pay? Why |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:25 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig fuck.
no. neither party can be held due to impossibility? |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:28 PM Author: onyx hospital i'm sure that's wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875029) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:28 PM Author: Chest-beating Meetinghouse Doctorate This is a bar exam type question You won't need to know it as a 1L |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:29 PM Author: mint faggotry 1l doesnt do ucc? it's been a while (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875049) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:31 PM Author: nubile nibblets mediation depends on professor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875066) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:33 PM Author: onyx hospital mine sure as shit did. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875077) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:40 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig got just the tip of it in my class (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875123) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:03 PM Author: fuchsia stimulating locale WTF? Are you taught by someone who's over the age of 70? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875362) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:29 PM Author: mint faggotry FOB means that the risk of loss doesnt pass until the goods are transferred to buyers. COD (cash on delivery). Since no delivery B doesnt have to pay.
Conversely, if the K is FOB (sellers city) than risk of loss passes when goods are put on the carrier. So lets say A sells to B. A is out of NYC. K states FOB NYC and plane is blown up B still needs to pay |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:23 PM Author: fishy cowardly antidepressant drug Zero percent chance that Doobs in not posting in this thread. 50 percent chance he is multiple people in this thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26874988) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:25 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875005) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:27 PM Author: razzmatazz patrolman bawdyhouse Explain the difference between promissory estoppel, quantum meruit, and quasi-contract. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875023) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:39 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig P/E - must be some type of promise-induced detrimental reliance. generally a substitute for consideration in order to avoid injustice.
Qk is an instance in which the parties would have but could not have formed a K. A must have conferred benefit on B and there is a good reason why B could not consent to this benefit but would definitely want to. A must have expected compensation.
QM is applied in instances in which one party is unjustly enriched by performance of the other.
|
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:43 PM Author: razzmatazz patrolman bawdyhouse What's the difference between quantum meruit and restitution? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875144) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:47 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig restitution compensates the party for benefits conferred (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875178) |
|
Date: December 8th, 2014 7:52 AM Author: concupiscible hilarious ratface parlor restitution is for faggots. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26885132) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 10:54 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig MOAR (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875267) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:02 PM Author: Lime Karate Shitlib why is unconscionability a shitty way to invalidate a K? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875346) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:10 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig because you have to prove that there was a defect in bargaining AND enforcement would led to an overly harsh, shocking, one-sided result? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875443) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:12 PM Author: Lime Karate Shitlib because it's paternalistic and dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875457) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:02 PM Author: mint faggotry A hires B to plan their wedding *b is a wedding planner*. B charges them 10k. B books the hotel with C for 6k and arranges with D to do the floral arrangements for 2k.
The night before the wedding C told B they double booked the hotel and cannot have two events. In a scramble C calls hotel E which charges them 15k for the event.
As it turns out D has already sent the flowers to hotel C. Hotel C had a power outage the night before and the flowers die.
identify any causes of action |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:09 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig fuck my ass (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875433) |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:14 PM Author: Irradiated pozpig seriously, don't even know where to begin here:
B against C for double booking - probably strongest claim here since it was more foreseeable than the rest
A against B for more expensive hotel
A against B for no flowers
B against C for power outage |
|
Date: December 6th, 2014 11:22 PM Author: mint faggotry yep pretty good. also in the exam make sure to explain what the damages are. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26875530) |
|
Date: December 8th, 2014 3:08 PM Author: Henna Swashbuckling Stage B against D for selling flowers that die if they aren't near an electric current for 12 hours? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26886986) |
|
Date: December 8th, 2014 2:43 AM Author: Irradiated pozpig Anyone wanna quiz me? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2749127&forum_id=2/#26884707) |