Supreme Court in 6-3 decision: “ fuck your online free speech”
| cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | death grip dead bed | 06/26/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | death grip dead bed | 06/26/24 | | "''"'"'""'"" | 06/26/24 | | Kenneth Play | 06/26/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 06/26/24 | | A lawyer (or lower) | 06/26/24 | | "''"'"'""'"" | 06/26/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 06/26/24 | | lysergic chad | 06/27/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 06/26/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 06/26/24 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 06/27/24 | | So we looked at the data | 06/27/24 | | "'"'"'" | 06/27/24 | | jag | 06/29/24 | | FizzKidd | 06/29/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/26/24 | | OSTRACIZED BOOMER DOMINATING THE BORT | 06/26/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/26/24 | | "We" | 06/26/24 | | potluck | 06/26/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | potluck | 06/26/24 | | Kenneth Play | 06/26/24 | | Hollywood Hogan | 06/26/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/26/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 06/27/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/27/24 | | .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., | 06/26/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | "''"'"'""'"" | 06/26/24 | | CriminalConversation | 06/26/24 | | This actually helps, and here's why | 06/27/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/27/24 | | CapTTTainFalcon | 06/26/24 | | UhOh | 06/26/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/26/24 | | "We" | 06/26/24 | | cock of michael obama | 06/26/24 | | Gay Gujarati | 06/26/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/26/24 | | White Privilege Log | 06/26/24 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 06/26/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/26/24 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 06/27/24 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 06/27/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/27/24 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 06/27/24 | | queensbridge benzo | 06/27/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/27/24 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 06/27/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/27/24 | | .- .-. . .-. . .--. - .. .-.. . | 06/27/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 06/27/24 | | "''"'"'""'"" | 06/27/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 26th, 2024 12:10 PM Author: Live Free or Die.
at least link the opinion, we're lawyers not retards reading MSN for legal analysis.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf
edit:
Held: Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have established Article III standing to seek an injunction against any defendant. Pp. 8– 29.
big fucking deal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47779267)
|
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 27th, 2024 10:06 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
cr.
it's a green light for libs to use cutouts so that the federal government can censor speech.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47782099) |
Date: June 26th, 2024 12:15 PM
Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,
Who can have standing then?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47779281) |
Date: June 26th, 2024 7:08 PM Author: Gay Gujarati
The FIRE ripped the decision:
https://www.thefire.org/news/fire-statement-murthy-v-missouri
Below is a statement from FIRE Chief Counsel Robert Corn-Revere on today's Supreme Court ruling on Murthy v. Missouri:
The Supreme Court sidestepped deciding whether government pressure on social media platforms violates the First Amendment. But just a few weeks ago, it unanimously reaffirmed a core First Amendment principle: The government can’t censor by private coercion any more than it can by public legislation.
Despite reams of evidence documenting government pressure, the court held today these plaintiffs lacked standing to sue. FIRE is concerned about what this means for future First Amendment plaintiffs. But the majority opinion notes courts have the power to stop government attempts to pressure social media platforms when proven. That’s important.
When government officials attempt to force platforms into censorship, Americans need to know. To secure transparency, Congress must take action. A little bit of sunlight would go a long way toward ending the censorship by coercion at issue here.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47780640) |
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 27th, 2024 1:20 AM
Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;
TBF Thomas’ decades long free speech libertarianism is well known, and in a few recent decisions he seemed to be pounding his chest that he could get major precedents overturned. Kav and ACB are both fucking weather vains at this point so it’s hard to predict much of anything at this point, and therefore silly to proclaim certainty in the outcome of any case like this where they will decide the outcome, which is almost all of them. But to the extent I recall vaguely what you’re describing I think DM or whoever could’ve reasonably been understood to just be wishcasting that Thomas was going to win the cucknoobs over on this issue, which wasn’t a crazy thing to hope for.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47781476) |
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 27th, 2024 6:03 AM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
Oh a non-lawyer said it? I guess you gotta take your victories where you can find them, Mark. Best of luck.
Separately, did you call Rach and tell him to ban me yet? Do you need help dialing the phone?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47781664) |
Date: June 27th, 2024 3:03 AM Author: queensbridge benzo
"we care about free speech again!"
you people literally want to imprison librarians because you think that books are the reason we have gay people. if the government can compel companies to tell consumers that they'll die if they buy their products, it follows that the government can also compel social media companies to let their users know that ringworm pills and bleach are way better at killing retards than they are at killing covid. it makes no sense to claim that doing something is fine while at the same time claiming that merely threatening to do it somehow crosses a line. but if you still think a line was crossed, you should explain your reasoning to the guys at facebook/twitter (so that the next time this happens they won't have to depend on unaffected partisan hacks to sue on their behalf).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2/#47781570) |
|
|