https://x.com/nypost/status/1973842827617415391?t=D62ZW_HnsVZj0m763eGIgg&s=19

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5782423&forum_id=2/#49320422)

It's become the defining issue of our times and Israel hasn't done a great job explaining their side of the case for reasons I've touched on earlier. The insular nature of the Jews keeps them from expressing the breadth of their grief over both the Palestinian complaint as well as their domestic troubles

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5782423&forum_id=2/#49320453)

"Grrr people shouldn't be conscious on *MY* plantation"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5782423&forum_id=2/#49320518)

By all accounts 10/7 was an atrocity especially under Western standards. They're not wrong to be angry about it. The relationship between the two peoples is complex and full of nuance that makes a clear right/wrong distinction difficult to observers elsewhere though. wrt Israel I criticize them all of the time (and with the intent that jewish concerns would be better served by a more above-the-table approach anyhow). The immediate Palestine response is not something I think was unjustified at all though. What's been "wrong" about it is the conduct involved during furthering the war and avoidance of diplomatic solutions already brokered by international bodies. Retaliating against a hostile principality to get your hostages back is righteous and just. Raping prisoners and starving civilian populations is not. Bombing campaigns against targets tactically blurred by human shield techniques is somewhere in the middle. It's difficult to engage with the discourse around it as it's become such a kneejerk retard-filtered left/right thing polluted by noxious overarching lib ideological facets that the actual truth and rights and wrongs of the matter have become lost in "what American public opinions wants (or needs) it to be" vs what it actually is, which is a very morally grey conflict in a part of the world defined by conflicts of that nature

Anyone familiar with the world-weariness of Arabs knows why it exists, and it's from a history both ancient and recent littered with matters of this nature

Frankly? Palestine sucks and makes for an awful and violent neighbor. Israel is also the cause of this in no small part and bears greater responsibility for the state of things there than they're willing to admit. The real solutions to the matter lie outside of the current devolutionary discourse around it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5782423&forum_id=2/#49320535)

2. hamas is literally some jews

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5782423&forum_id=2/#49320521)

Nobody has any issue with Sufis, for example. And the Shiites are by and large self-civilized, and much of their propensity for conflict with Israel and the US has to do more with geopolitical and historical issues that get translated over into the US as "Shia bad" rather than anything to do with the Twelver flavor of Islam itself. Iran "cooled" after the Steppe invasions, similar to Europe after the World Wars came and went there. These are no longer the warlike people of Cyrus and Xerxes and it's evident when you see Iran coming to Westernization and reaching outwards like a baby for trade and ties with the West on its own

If anything I think Israel is just afraid of losing its Most Favored Nation status in the region with the West and fretful to admit that the Iranians and Israelis have more in common with each other than they do the rest of the region. It's rather easy to see a future in where Iran/Israel ties open and deepen due to a visible understanding that they are ideologically island nations surrounded by hostile Sunni populations that do not respect their religious differences. Perhaps the Turks coming to arms once again will speed that along?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5782423&forum_id=2/#49320578)