The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
LJL -- the LA Times has the best take on the debate (LINK)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 11th, 2024 6:23 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Unironically.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-trump-missed-the-moment-but-he-s-in-better-shape-at-this-juncture-than-in-three-other-tries/ar-AA1qmGgu?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ASTS&cvid=f83aa791a0a44ec3886d6461b68d2184&ei=11 |
Date: September 11th, 2024 6:28 PM Author: MASE Fair. I don’t think he should debate again because there’s not a great chance he improves. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5593173&forum_id=2/en-en/#48078003) |
 |
Date: September 11th, 2024 6:30 PM Author: average/ordinary/typical citizen/person He absolutely should if it really is a Fox debate. Can't see Kamala agreeing to that but only thing she showed last night is she will crumble at any follow up questioning by moderators. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5593173&forum_id=2/en-en/#48078011) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 6:45 PM Author: ...,....,,........ Fox will make sure there is a YUUUUUGE studio audience so that Dementia Don can have an audience to perform in front of. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5593173&forum_id=2/en-en/#48078084) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 6:44 PM Author: ...,....,,........ Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings
Opinion by Scott Jennings |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 6:47 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Which part of the article did you substantively disagree with, Ari?
Would love to know, please feel free to cut and paste the specific lines in this analysis that struck you as being most unfair, partisan, or retarded. |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 7:17 PM Author: ...,....,,........ Please, post more opinion pieces by contracted-CNN political pundits (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5593173&forum_id=2/en-en/#48078197) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 10:32 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Why should I give a fuck who the author of this analysis is? If the analysis is good and I agree, then it's good and I agree. I think it's good, and I agree.
Do you actually have a substantive bone to pick with any of the major points made in this piece, or are you just being a little argumentative faggot on the internet for no reason? If the former, feel free to share your thoughts. If the latter, just shut the fuck up already you boring pointlessly querulous midwit kike. |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 10:38 PM Author: Christopher's Disease Don't you regularly complain that whoever you're arguing with is Jewish and you therefore can't argue with them, etc.? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5593173&forum_id=2/en-en/#48078970) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 10:39 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
No, at this point I simply refuse to read a political analysis in the first place if I see an obviously Jewish name attached to it because 90%+ of the time it's not worth my time and life is short. But if I did (accidentally) read an analysis penned by a kike and I thought it was good, I wouldn't hesitate to say so. |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 7:16 PM Author: LathamTouchedMe It’s generally fair. My only quibble is with the notion that he’s in a much better position. The RCP average on 9/11 in 2016 had Clinton with a 3.1% advantage. The final rcp average that year was off by 1.1% on national polling. Harris has 1.9% edge now in the multi candidate national rcp avg. So is he really in a better position than 2016? Who knows where the polling error will go. And but for the Comey reveal at the end hillary would have carried wisc, mich, and pa. If Harris gets a boost from the debate she’s probably no worse off than Biden in 2020. I think bettors, pundits, and pollsters have finally caught on that they underrated trumps chances in 2016 and 2020. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5593173&forum_id=2/en-en/#48078192) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2024 10:35 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
"And but for the Comey reveal at the end hillary would have carried wisc, mich, and pa."
I love how you just casually throw this line in here with such absolute confidence and certainty. Yeah, that's really what the whole 2016 election ultimately came down to -- Comey's statement. Experts agree, this is settled political science btw. (The deciding factor definitely wasn't Hillary's arrogance and failure to actually campaign well or anything like that.) It really is that simple at the end of the day, trust me I know these things, it all boiled down to Comey... I'm able to access counterfactual alternate universes and thereby isolate variables so I can make pronouncements like this (plus I'm also VERY smart).
LJL you pretentious "Thoughtful Moderate" midwit faggot. |