This Twitter guy says all past rulings on administrative matters stand - link
| ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 06/28/24 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 06/28/24 | | .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,. | 06/28/24 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 06/28/24 | | .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,. | 06/28/24 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 06/28/24 | | .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,. | 06/28/24 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 06/28/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 06/28/24 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 06/28/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 06/28/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:11 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
https://x.com/smellbringer/status/1806695829950115964
If so, should reduce the flood of litigation by a lot.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788422) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:12 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
https://x.com/smellbringer/status/1806700232501334316
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788426) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:15 AM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.
oh wow a random guy on twitter who watches video games says a thing. go back to reddit you disgusting tranny
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788449) |
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:16 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
In the second tweet I posted he quotes the opinion, moron.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788459) |
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:46 AM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.
That doesn't mean they can't be challenged you moron
go back to Reddit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788610) |
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:51 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
Hey dipshit, if someone really hated a particular regulation enough to challenge it in court then Chevron was not a strong enough precedent the last several years to prevent them from doing so. Not even close.
It's not like anyone who actually followed the Supreme Court decisions like West Virginia v. EPA thought "oh my god, the current federal judiciary totally defers to agencies- no point in filing suit."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788639)
|
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 2:48 PM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.
cope and seethe, reddit tranny
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47789576) |
![](blank.gif) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 2:49 PM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
Brilliant point, your high IQ is obvious.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47789580) |
Date: June 28th, 2024 11:24 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
Also, Roberts said in his opinion that SCOTUS hasn't relied on Chevron in an opinion since 2016. With the major questions doctrine being decided in 2022 it was already clear SCOTUS wasn't going to be deferring to agencies that strongly.
So I don't think Chevron had as much power under current law as many are assuming.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5547073&forum_id=2/en-en/#47788506) |
|
|