Remember when libs forcememed "stochastic terrorism"?
| Nofapping Sepia Gaping | 07/13/24 | | concupiscible khaki codepig cumskin | 07/13/24 | | Nofapping Sepia Gaping | 07/13/24 | | geriatric dilemma | 07/13/24 | | Nofapping Sepia Gaping | 07/13/24 | | mustard piazza pocket flask | 02/19/25 | | maize impressive round eye property | 02/19/25 | | Lascivious poppy nibblets | 02/19/25 | | Vermilion Wonderful Telephone Fortuitous Meteor | 07/01/25 | | Jet ladyboy macaca | 07/01/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 13th, 2024 9:11 PM Author: Nofapping Sepia Gaping
The theory is that if you say enough mean things about a person or group, it will eventually inspire some wacko to commit violence against that person or group. Therefore such mean speech is terrorism and should be punishable.
Over/under on length of time before libs have the stones to resurrect that argument?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5554984&forum_id=2/en-en/#47839351) |
Date: February 19th, 2025 2:02 AM Author: maize impressive round eye property
Trumpmos were all over this theory after the attempted assassination
They wouldn't let you criticize him because that would just be encouraging more violence
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5554984&forum_id=2/en-en/#48673592) |
|
|