\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
magical provocative field electric furnace
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
Aphrodisiac rambunctious useless brakes police squad
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
magical provocative field electric furnace
  11/29/25
...
heady pistol
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
Wonderful persian chapel
  11/29/25
lol jfc
magical provocative field electric furnace
  11/29/25
...
lemon fragrant public bath internal respiration
  11/29/25
wow
Chrome organic girlfriend base
  12/07/25
lmao
Supple resort
  12/07/25
...
lemon fragrant public bath internal respiration
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
Chrome organic girlfriend base
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
spectacular sienna community account
  12/07/25
Mental illness
180 jew
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
emerald stirring piazza associate
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
Aphrodisiac rambunctious useless brakes police squad
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
metal garnet range
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
heady pistol
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: magical provocative field electric furnace

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: Aphrodisiac rambunctious useless brakes police squad

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: magical provocative field electric furnace

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: heady pistol



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: Wonderful persian chapel

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: magical provocative field electric furnace

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: lemon fragrant public bath internal respiration



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Chrome organic girlfriend base

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Supple resort

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: lemon fragrant public bath internal respiration



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Chrome organic girlfriend base

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: spectacular sienna community account

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: 180 jew

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: emerald stirring piazza associate

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: Aphrodisiac rambunctious useless brakes police squad

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: metal garnet range

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: heady pistol

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2/en-en/#49527743)