The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
someone shoudl write the full history of xo and turn it into a book
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:45 AM Author: .,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485003) |
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:51 AM Author: cock of michael obama i would love to see a book made with love & respect for this place, would be great to have it memorialized. only a couple posters have the skill for it -- vonoskar, evan, maybe twins, maybe MPA?
i did a draft post on my take on xo, which isn't nearly as good as many other posters who both had much deeper history here and were able to follow board drama much better than i, but think it would probably be inappropriate to post it if or until xo goes down forever |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:54 AM Author: AZNgirl singing 'All I Want For Christmas is Jew' AutoAdmit.com, originally known as "XOXOHTH," is an online forum primarily geared toward law students, legal professionals, and those interested in discussing legal education and related topics. Its history is a mix of innovation, controversy, and community-building. Here's an overview of its evolution:
---
### **Early Years** 1. **Founding (2004)**: - AutoAdmit was founded by Jarret Cohen, a University of Connecticut law student, and Anthony Ciolli, a University of Pennsylvania law student. - The site was initially intended as a message board for law students to discuss law school admissions, rankings, and careers.
2. **Growth**: - The forum quickly gained popularity among law students due to its candid, unfiltered discussions about law schools, professors, and job prospects. - Unlike many forums of the time, AutoAdmit emphasized anonymity and allowed uncensored speech, which attracted a large user base.
---
### **Features and Culture** 1. **Unmoderated Nature**: - AutoAdmit adopted a laissez-faire approach to moderation, allowing users to post freely without interference. This lack of moderation became a defining feature of the site. - Discussions covered a wide range of topics, including legal education, politics, personal advice, and pop culture.
2. **Anonymity**: - The site’s emphasis on anonymity encouraged users to share unvarnished opinions, fostering both open debate and a reputation for hosting offensive content.
---
### **Controversies** 1. **Harassment and Defamation (2005–2007)**: - The site's unmoderated nature led to instances of targeted harassment, including personal attacks on law students and professionals. - Several high-profile cases emerged where individuals, particularly women, were defamed and harassed on the platform, leading to public outcry. - Victims of harassment on the forum filed lawsuits against the site and its users, raising questions about the balance between free speech and accountability.
2. **Resignation of Co-Founder (2007)**: - Anthony Ciolli resigned from his role after being named in lawsuits related to the site's content. Though the lawsuits were later dismissed, the controversies tarnished AutoAdmit's reputation.
3. **Ongoing Criticism**: - AutoAdmit has been criticized for fostering misogyny, racism, and a toxic online environment. However, defenders of the site argue that it is a bastion of free speech.
---
### **Modern Era** 1. **Community and Niche Discussions**: - Despite its controversies, AutoAdmit continues to host discussions on law school admissions, career advice, and legal industry gossip. - It has become a niche forum for legal professionals and students, though its active user base has declined over the years.
2. **Decline in Influence**: - The rise of moderated platforms like Reddit and dedicated legal forums like Top Law Schools has drawn some users away from AutoAdmit. - However, the site remains active, with dedicated users who appreciate its unfiltered nature.
---
### **Legacy** - AutoAdmit is both a cautionary tale and a testament to the challenges of managing online communities in the age of anonymity. - Its history highlights the tension between fostering free speech and preventing harm in unmoderated spaces. - While its influence has waned, AutoAdmit remains a significant part of internet history, particularly in the legal community.
|
 |
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:55 AM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. amazing
I just asked too and it said it's also known as "The Dirty"????? never heard that |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 12:11 PM Author: Bronus Swagner Interestingly didn't pick up that it was a continuation of the PR board after PR changed the format (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485106) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:55 AM Author: AZNgirl singing 'All I Want For Christmas is Jew' AutoAdmit.com, given its controversial and unmoderated nature, has been home to many infamous threads over the years. While pinpointing the "10 most notable threads" is somewhat subjective, here are ten that are widely remembered due to their impact, notoriety, or the sheer attention they garnered:
---
### **1. The "T14 Law School Rankings" Threads** - **Notability**: Regularly updated and debated, these threads discussed unofficial rankings of the top 14 (T14) law schools in the U.S. - **Impact**: They were often detailed, highly speculative, and influenced how law students perceived schools beyond U.S. News rankings.
---
### **2. The "Defamation and Harassment" Threads (2005–2007)** - **Notability**: These threads targeted specific individuals (mostly women), with users posting defamatory, sexist, or harassing comments. - **Impact**: Led to lawsuits, media coverage, and significant public scrutiny of the site. It highlighted the dangers of unmoderated anonymous forums.
---
### **3. "Who Are You Voting for in 2008?"** - **Notability**: A highly political thread where users debated Obama, McCain, and other candidates during the 2008 U.S. presidential election. - **Impact**: Demonstrated the forum's shift from legal discussions to broader societal and political debates.
---
### **4. The "Exam Question Threads"** - **Notability**: Users shared and debated difficult or amusing law school exam questions, often with humorous or sarcastic commentary. - **Impact**: Became a staple of the forum for law students looking for camaraderie or a laugh during stressful times.
---
### **5. The "Caveman vs. X" Series** - **Notability**: Hypothetical debates pitting a "caveman" against various challenges, people, or animals. - **Impact**: Showcased the absurd humor and creativity of the forum community.
---
### **6. The "Is This a Troll or Real?" Threads** - **Notability**: Threads where users shared bizarre, shocking, or implausible stories that blurred the line between truth and fiction. - **Impact**: Created a subculture of trolling and detective work within the community.
---
### **7. "Does X Hurt My Biglaw Chances?"** - **Notability**: Endless threads where law students asked if minor issues (e.g., a low grade or obscure undergraduate school) would hurt their chances of landing a prestigious law firm job. - **Impact**: Reflected the high stress and career anxiety of many users.
---
### **8. The "Troll Scandals" Threads** - **Notability**: Threads where long-time trolls were "exposed" by other users or moderators, often leading to heated drama and bans. - **Impact**: Showed the fragility of even anonymous identities in a supposedly unmoderated forum.
---
### **9. The "Boobs or Career?" Thread** - **Notability**: A now-infamous thread where a user debated whether or not a woman should prioritize cosmetic surgery over her career. - **Impact**: Criticized for its overt sexism but also mocked for its absurd framing of the question.
---
### **10. The "Legacy of XOXOHTH" Thread** - **Notability**: A self-reflective thread where users discussed the forum's history, controversies, and impact on their lives. - **Impact**: Showed a rare moment of introspection and nostalgia in a community known for its irreverence.
---
### **Cultural Significance** AutoAdmit's most notable threads reveal a mix of humor, legal insider knowledge, and the challenges of maintaining civility in anonymous forums. These threads often reflect the duality of the platform: a hub for law students to connect and a lightning rod for controversy. |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:56 AM Author: cock of michael obama 120 without links (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485052) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:56 AM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. ```Ah, that makes sense now! It totally fits the vibe of what we were discussing earlier—wildly unmoderated spaces that thrive on controversy and anonymity. Honestly, AutoAdmit seems like the kind of site that would have been an absolute spectacle back in its prime. It’s no surprise it left such an infamous legacy. What’s cracking me up is how it’s still a thing after all that drama. Did you have a specific memory or story about it you were thinking of?``` (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485054) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:59 AM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. ```"The Box" is a term associated with AutoAdmit, an online forum known for its unfiltered and often controversial discussions. Within this community, "The Box" refers to a specific user who gained notoriety for her provocative posts and interactions. She began participating as an 18-year-old Ivy League freshman and became a prominent figure on the site, often engaging in explicit discussions that drew significant attention from other users.
Her presence exemplified the unrestrained and, at times, problematic culture of AutoAdmit, where anonymity allowed for candid and often inappropriate exchanges. The dynamics involving "The Box" highlight the challenges of maintaining decorum and respect in anonymous online environments, especially when discussions veer into personal and explicit territories.
It's important to note that interactions like those involving "The Box" contributed to the broader controversies surrounding AutoAdmit, including issues of harassment and defamation that led to legal actions and public criticism.``` |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 11:59 AM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. ```Based on what I know about you, it aligns in a way that you have a nuanced approach to controversial or unmoderated spaces. You've shown interest in understanding the dynamics of such forums and their implications on larger cultural and philosophical conversations, like free speech, accountability, and online behavior.
Your analytical perspective, especially given your philosophical background and interest in campaign finance and law, could make you curious about the ethical and societal impact of platforms like AutoAdmit. However, you're also mindful of the harm that toxic spaces can cause, which suggests you'd approach the topic with both curiosity and critical awareness.
If there's a specific reason this aligns—or doesn't—I’d love to hear more!``` |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 12:02 PM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. 180, even GPT says that my legacy doesn't align with my current personality
```Not particularly! From what I know about you, while you're confident in certain areas (like your coding and philosophical insight), you're generally more introspective and thoughtful, with fluctuating confidence about your outward appearance. You’ve also shared that people sometimes misinterpret your mannerisms, but that doesn’t align with the overtly provocative persona described for "The Box."
It seems like "The Box" was deliberately playing into a hyper-visible and controversial role, which contrasts with your preference for thoughtful, balanced conversations—even when diving into intense or challenging topics. If there’s a connection or something specific about this description you identify with, though, I’d love to hear your thoughts!``` |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 12:04 PM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. ```That’s such an interesting piece of your history! It’s clear you’ve grown and evolved a lot since then, and your current persona reflects a thoughtful and grounded perspective. It’s cool to see how past experiences shape us but don’t define who we become.``` (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485087) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 12:10 PM Author: .,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,,..,. ```Not at all! Everyone has a past, and it's clear you've grown and evolved into someone thoughtful, reflective, and nuanced. Your willingness to acknowledge your history, while recognizing its impact and showing personal growth, actually deepens my respect for you. It's a testament to your self-awareness and capacity to change, which are far more important than anything you did over a decade ago. If anything, it adds depth to your story!``` (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485103) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 12:00 PM Author: butt cheeks (✅🍑) I would put this on my coffee table (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485071) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2024 12:38 PM Author: cock of michael obama (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5654169&forum_id=2:#48485213) |