Date: April 8th, 2025 3:07 PM
Author: mint internal respiration wrinkle
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25888805/24a904-order.pdf
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
24A904 OPM, ET AL. V. AFGE, ET AL.
The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by
her referred to the Court is granted. The March 13, 2025
preliminary injunction entered by the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California, case No. 3:25-cv1780, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and
disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a
writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay
shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is
granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the
judgment of this Court.
The District Court’s injunction was based solely on the
allegations of the nine non-profit-organization plaintiffs in
this case. But under established law, those allegations are
presently insufficient to support the organizations’ standing.
See, e.g., Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l USA, 568 U. S. 398 (2013).
This order does not address the claims of the other plaintiffs,
which did not form the basis of the District Court’s preliminary
injunction.
Justice Sotomayor would deny the application.
Justice Jackson would have declined to reach the standing
question in the context of an application for emergency relief
2
where the issue is pending in the lower courts and the applicants
have not demonstrated urgency in the form of interim irreparable
harm. See Department of Education v. California, 604 U. S. ___,
___ (2025) (Jackson, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 1–2). Thus,
she would have denied the application.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5707478&forum_id=2:#48827940)