The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
ITT: "Sealclubber" explains what 'technical analysis' is (LINK)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:16 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Put those historical stonk price charts away, you retards. They're totally meaningless, and btw don't you know that even looking at them and noticing generalized patterns over the years constitutes 'technical analysis' which is a bunch of fake low IQ shit for idiots? *You're* not an idiot... are you???
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694326&forum_id=2#48748717 |
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:19 PM Author: metapoaster sometimes I wonder if sealclubber is a schtick, his stupidity is off the charts (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48750395) |
 |
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:22 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
What the intelligent financial advisor actually said: "Bear in mind that past performance is not a guarantee of future success when you invest in ston--"
What "sealclubber" (a retard) heard him say: "THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF A STONK IS AN IRRELEVANT METRIC AND ONLY STUPID PEOPLE CONSIDER IT WHEN INVESTING.... I AM A SMART PERSON, SO THEREFORE I DON'T CONSIDER IT, GOD I HATE STUPID PEOPLE THEY SUCK SOOOO MUCH AND I LOOK DOWN ON THEM AND GRRRR, STUPID 'TECHNICAL ANALYSIS' GRRRR!"
It's amazing how many times this dynamic plays out in all sorts of areas. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:47 PM Author: sealclubber to be faggot, what your thread title said is "TSLA has lost >40% of it's value at least 5x since 2018 and always hit new ATHs." and then you proceeded in your first two posts to say how stupid everyone is because "To be fair,
Brilliant Jewish XO Pumos: "LOL u retard that's all totally irrelevant, history won't repeat itself again -- this time is totally different for reasons, and TSLA is never going to bounce back up again. Hope u sold it all becuz if not UR FUKT!"
lol" and "To be fair,
AMAZING COINCIDENCE (SIT DOWN FOR THIS YOU'LL NEVER SEE THE TWIST COMING):
BTC has also lost >75% of it's value at least 5x since 2010, and every time it also rose once again to achieve new ATHs.
...guess what Brilliant Jewish XO Pumos have also been saying about BTC's latest dip?
;)" so you doubled down on your stupidity. at least your stupidity is accompanied with arrogance. you're no better than a gambler being confident about a future result because of what you've seen in the past |
|
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:22 PM Author: sealclubber to be faggot, resorting to one of the lamest fucking schticks on xoxo getting humiliated and then posting a separate thread attacking someone because you're too much of a faggot to defend your idiocy in the original thread btw, for anyone popping in i quoted the definition of technical analysis from investopedia and it matched up with exactly with what to be faggot was doing |
|
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:24 PM Author: neurotic comptroller For what it’s worth, you did cook him in that thread, but you’re still a retard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48750411) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 11:49 AM Author: big fat nude butts ((zurich is stained)) I disagree. “Technical analysis” is trying to divine where stock prices are headed in the short term based on stupid terms like “inverted w pattern” or whatever the fuck. Tbf seemed to be making a more generic, high-level point - Tesla and bitcoin have dropped yugely before and come back and he thinks that’ll happen again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48752344) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 8:03 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Sorry bro, but any reference to a stonk's past performance -- no matter how generalized or high-level -- is "technical analysis," that's just the dictionary definition of it bro it's all right there.
BTW the experts all agree that "technical analysis" is a bunch of low IQ bullshit, so I hope you aren't one of those dumb midwit goys who does stupid shit like looking back at the historical performance of stonks and taking that performance into account when you're making speculative investment decisions about where you think they're likely to go in the future. People who do that are performing "technical analysis," and doing that sort of thing makes you a certified moron. You're not a moron, are you? |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 8:11 PM Author: big fat nude butts ((zurich is stained)) to be faggot, i, zurich is gay, am indeed a moron (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48753509) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 9:00 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
(Zurch is gay is faggot) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 9:03 PM Author: big fat nude butts ((zurich is stained)) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48753671) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:24 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Thanks for clarifying this for anyone who wasn't able to click the link I dropped in the OP and spend 30 seconds reading our entire unabridged exchange in context. Very helpful and important addition! |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 11:07 AM Author: big fat nude butts ((zurich is stained)) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48752264) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 11:21 AM Author: Cumbutt (gunneratttt) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48752278) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 12:00 PM Author: Cumbutt (gunneratttt) i love how even sealclubbers nicknames demonstrate how artless and stupid he is.
i'm gunnerfaggot. tbf is "to be faggot." even his own moniker "sealclubber" is something a lackwit neocon would think is edgy and hilarious. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2025 4:36 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48750439) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 11:12 AM Author: Cumbutt (gunneratttt) one of my favorite's of all time
https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5517972&mc=90&forum_id=2#47585650
gold's value today is based partially on the assumption that some parts of spacecraft that will assist human's leaving earth will be made of gold!
my god, the corrosion resistant gold tipped circuit boards! |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 7:56 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
*Ancient Sumerian man shrewdly hoarding all of that pretty stuff he dug up because he knows someday it will help mankind to build complex rockets which will facilitate interstellar travel to new universes he can't even begin to fathom* |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 10:01 PM Author: sealclubber to be fair, you still haven't come up with one speck of intrinsic value for bitcoin bitcoin could disappear tomorrow and there would be no tangible effect on anyone enjoy your tulips while you can, bitch |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 10:03 PM Author: Cumbutt (gunneratttt) meanwhile if all the gold in the world disappeared the world would be devasted from the clucking of shrews who are enraged by the missing shinny metal trinkets (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5694649&forum_id=2:#48753798) |
|
Date: March 16th, 2025 10:31 PM Author: sealclubber faggeratttt, please do a quick search of gold's advantages over silver and copper before you post such stupid drivel you're a real fucking pothole on the xoxo road |
|
Date: March 17th, 2025 12:19 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
So you're saying that gold is actually way more expensive than silver and copper because gold has a bunch of very useful traits that give it an "intrinsic value" as a physical material which can't simply be boiled down to "ooooo it's so prettty and shiiiiiny, I liiiiiike it"?
You sure about that, bud?
Because as I understand it, the "price" of any commodity is determined by the global demand for that commodity. And last time I checked, <7% of gold is actually being used for any sort of industrial application in the modern world -- meaning that the global demand for gold's utility in industrial applications only accounts for <7% of its current "price" in the global marketplace. Here's a source on that: https://www.statista.com/statistics/299609/gold-demand-by-industry-sector-share/
As of 2023, ~50% of the global demand for gold came from the "oooo it's soooo prettttty" trinkets and baubles sector, and another ~45% of the global demand for gold either came from investors who want to use it as a vehicle for bald financial speculation (BTC is now widely used for exactly this same purpose and yet you scoff at the suggestion that this use gives BTC any "intrinsic value") or from central banks who want to use it as a vehicle for storing wealth and hedging against inflation (same comment as above).
So what am I missing here? Because to me, it looks like ~93% of the current "price" of gold in the global marketplace can be directly attributed to "oooo it's shiny and pretty" plus two other uses which you yourself have previously stated DO NOT IN AND OF THEMSELVES afford a commodity any sort of "intrinsic value" in your opinion.
Pretty confused here... suffice to say, I'm really looking forward to you clearing this up for me.
TYVMIA. |