Jesus the emoluments clause
| flatulent halford headpube | 01/21/20 | | Provocative Patrolman | 05/14/20 | | Judas Jones | 05/13/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 14th, 2020 10:30 AM Author: Provocative Patrolman
I respect of course the office of the presidency. But I revere, like each and every one of my fine colleagues on this court, the role of courts in making real the rule of law. But courts can best promote the rule of law by not setting themselves so self-evidently above it. The majority has jeopardized a great deal today. The trust the public holds in courts depends on our staying out of the political fray. As the one branch of government removed from the democratic process, the federal courts occupy a special position within our constitutional order. Namely, because we cannot be checked at the ballot box, and because we cherish our impartiality, we must scrupulously check the human tendency to excess in the exercise of power. To deserve our autonomy, we must, in the words of Justice Frankfurter, keep to a “duty of restraint, [a] humility of function.” Felix Frankfurter, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes, 47 Colum. L. Rev. 527, 534 (1947). The majority, by prolonging and perpetuating an ad hoc and untethered Emoluments Clause claim, has failed many times over to keep to this command. In this most rancorous of times, we should burnish the ideal that we can be respected stewards of those powers with which we have, in an extraordinary exhibition of the Founders’ and our fellow citizens’ faith, been entrusted.
https://www.law.com/2020/05/14/en-banc-fourth-circuit-revives-emoluments-lawsuits-against-trump/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12tFfikg3zZjn5UizoOlG-MtxwBONfnwA/view?usp=sharing
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4426799&forum_id=2:#40207522) |
|
|