The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Q about SCOTUS presidential immunity case
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 04/23/25 |
| jonathan penis | 04/23/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 04/24/25 |
| UN peacekeeper | 04/24/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 04/24/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 23rd, 2025 8:52 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. What was Roberts/the majority thinking about here in terms of areas where authority is shared with Congress such that immunity from prosecution wouldn’t apply?
From wikipedia:
Roberts explained that neither Congress nor the courts have authority to limit powers exclusively granted to the President under the Constitution and delineated the scope of absolute immunity when the president's acts fell outside of his core constitutional powers, writing that absolute immunity did not extend to "conduct in areas where his authority is shared with Congress". |
Date: April 23rd, 2025 8:56 PM Author: jonathan penis are you suggesting that he should NOT have built a critical jurisprudential framework atop a house of cards? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715334&forum_id=2:#48875490) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2025 9:11 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715334&forum_id=2:#48876519) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2025 9:19 AM Author: UN peacekeeper wiki is shit as you are discovering, just read the opinion itself or have ai (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715334&forum_id=2:#48876540) |
 |
Date: April 24th, 2025 9:26 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. AI says SCOTUS was talking about areas like federal law enforcement which aren’t part of POTUS’s core constitutional powers (like military, veto power, etc) but only exist via statutes enacted by Congress. It says POTUS CAN be prosecuted for using federal law enforcement to violate rights or do something illegal. Less clear is whether POTUS could escape prosecution by using the military to do whatever it he wants federal law enforcement to do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715334&forum_id=2:#48876551) |