"Have you talked this over with Barron?" he asked, referring to his 18-year-old son.

"No, sir," the young staffer told him. "Call Barron and see what he thinks and let me know."

After scrambling to contact Trump's youngest son, who Melania has shielded from the political fray, Bruesewitz got Barron's sign off. Their plan was to start with Adin Ross, a young provocateur mostly known for collabs with celebrities on live-streams of video games.

The podcast strategy was set in motion. Like with all things Trump, he relied on trusted family to serve as an arbiter within his operation and guide his strategic decision-making. In this case, it was Barron.

https://x.com/BasedTorba/status/1854295335511703847/photo/1

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48304729)

Privilege of growing up in the 90s turned out to be a deal w Satan

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48304741)

i can't tell you how many millennial male friends and acquaintances i've had who went from totally normal and cool to hopeless beta lib bitch after being in a long-term/marriage relationship with their millennial female gf/wife. it's a fucking epidemic. i would go so far to say that the main reason why gen z is trending so much more conservative than millennials is because far fewer of them are in relationships, so this phenomenon hasn't happened to them (yet?!)

solving all of the problems in our society will require saying 'no' to women and putting them back in their place. if the trump admin has a true People's Mandate for anything, i'd say that it's restricting the power and influence of women in society. this is the real reason why lib women hate trump so much btw: because he personally represents the potential to return to a societal paradigm when women were not disproportionately powerful

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48304999)

I think they're rational actors. They realize there's exactly one women in the world who's willing to have sex with them, and they have to comply in order to continue receiving access to sex.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48305017)

but most of these guys are normal, cool, attractive dudes, who have never had trouble getting women. but once they lock themselves down to just one woman via "marriage," they're stuck and they have no leverage over her. they can't just be like uh alright i'm just gonna leave for another woman if you don't stop acting like an obnoxious lib girlboss larping bitch, either explicitly or implicitly. and the women all know this, and use that leverage against the men to manipulate and control them

this is never going to work and is completely perverse and backwards. it's not hard to imagine how society would change if alimony and child support were banned: the situation would reverse, and women would be forced to make compromises to maintain relationships with men

women act like abortion is the most important thing ever to them. it's not. ask women if they'd rather alimony and child support be legal, or abortion be legal, and every single one of them, even those without a marriage or kids, will pick their infinite free financial leverage over men over abortion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48305065)

if what you're saying is true (marriage causally makes a person more con), we would expect to see a greater number of men becoming more conservative after marriage than they were before marriage, compared to the other way around. i have seen this...never, not a single time in my entire life. they only ever get more lib. i don't think there is any way that this is true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48305179)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48305214)

That's a good sign

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629358&forum_id=2:#48304825)