The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Am I wrong that these fires are 100x bigger insurance risk than hurricanes?
| ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 01/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 9th, 2025 10:12 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, Libs always screech about how no one should live in Florida, because after every hurricane they show like 1 house on the beach that got demolished. Meanwhile most houses are built to code and just fine - houses in the path *might* get some roof damage.
Even the "destroyed" homes by floods can be torn down to the studs and rebuilt fairly easily.
These California fires reduced entire urban neighborhoods to ash.
After a hurricane libs will talk aout how "we can't rebuild here" because Pete's Clam Shack, a wooden restaurant build in 1904 on the beach was destroyed.
This fire destroyed entire brand new shopping complexes filled with Starbucks and Equinox gym.
Is it possible for insurance companies to write policies on this stuff going forward?
Seems entirely possible an entire neighborhood like Santa Monica could be a total loss at some point in the near future... |