\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The Civil War was fought over slavery: T/F?

...
titillating anal home mexican
  01/28/13
T Anyone who says F is wrong.
Arousing Church
  01/28/13
Obviously. Only retarded Southerners trying to justify their...
Coral Chad
  01/28/13
(nebbish tristate jew)
comical jade becky
  01/28/13
Bro, I am most assuredly NOT a member of the tribe.
Coral Chad
  01/28/13
(Chosen person)
Pajeet 2025
  02/07/25
"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
pizza
bronze french chef
  01/28/13
u seem dumb bro.
Coral Chad
  01/28/13
****DO NOT READ**** ****WILL INSTANTLY MAKE YOU DUMBER****
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
lol saying that the civil war was about slavery doesn't mean...
maroon 180 son of senegal
  01/28/13
How can a conflict stem from something for which one party i...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
do you understand how politics works?
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
Yea, if you and I are sitting at a bargaining table and I sa...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
that's the point, dipshit. no one wanted a war but it was in...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
How can an issue reach a climax with no way around when one ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
are you actually this stupid?
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
You have yet to show how an issue for which one side is will...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
"when one side says that they are ok with whatever the ...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
the slavery issue had been ramping up for 40 years (see miss...
white potus circlehead
  01/28/13
lol. Abolition did not have the widespread support people ar...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
you're canadian, i get it.
white potus circlehead
  01/28/13
Letting the South secede was a way around it.
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
brother, are you from this country? when people say the civi...
maroon 180 son of senegal
  01/28/13
Sure, being "about slavery" does not necessarily m...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
except that the other side still said "fuck you we're l...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
This goes back to the germans with bayonets. The "Der g...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
how was that a useful tool to rile up the "base," ...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
Without slaves, cracker dirt farmers would've been at the bo...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
"Do w.e. you want about slaves" "do whatev...
maroon 180 son of senegal
  01/28/13
but but but In this enlightened age, there are few I bel...
white potus circlehead
  01/28/13
i really hope you are being sarcastic
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
i'm just thinking smart bro. just like cgm
white potus circlehead
  01/28/13
If a mom says to a kid "Don't cry, take all the candy y...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
lol BULLETPROOF
maroon 180 son of senegal
  01/28/13
i can't tell if you're being serious
cerise mind-boggling menage coffee pot
  01/28/13
A huge point of contention and a major cause of problems bef...
low-t motley electric furnace stage
  01/28/13
being astonishingly ignorant about basic facts has never sto...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
True but this is by far the most ignorant nonsense I've ever...
low-t motley electric furnace stage
  01/28/13
oh god, you are so stupid
Abnormal stock car
  01/28/13
(bro who pulled a C in HS US history)
comical jade becky
  01/28/13
OH WHAT A CIVIL WAR SCHOLAR!!!!!!!!
titillating anal home mexican
  01/28/13
It is January 1864, and the Confederacy is losing the war ag...
big-titted hall love of her life
  01/28/13
(Glenn Beck)
Well-lubricated Beady-eyed Public Bath
  01/28/13
lol @ turtledove.
Opaque Stead Turdskin
  01/28/13
You must be from the south.
Filthy library windowlicker
  01/28/13
Born and raised in rural Georgia
titillating anal home mexican
  01/28/13
True... with states rights as a proxy.
Copper Center
  01/28/13
Proxy? More like pre-text.
Coral Chad
  01/28/13
The Civil War was about states' rights. But the "righ...
Copper Center
  01/28/13
Tcr
Cream autistic dragon
  01/28/13
the Civil War was about states rights like the Iraq War was ...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
Dumb analogy. Southerners started the war because a) they...
Copper Center
  01/28/13
you just didn't understand it. do you think the south would ...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
No, but since cognitive dissonance is as common as grits in ...
Copper Center
  01/28/13
their leaders were not stupid and they were just as much pol...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
And that blew up in their face, didn't it? Like I said, c...
Copper Center
  01/28/13
good analogy, frankly
cerise mind-boggling menage coffee pot
  01/28/13
there's no a single war in history that was about just one t...
Multi-colored main people
  01/28/13
F, the civil war was fought of, by, and for Federalism.
effete den dog poop
  01/28/13
The civil war was fought to keep the south impoverished and ...
spectacular set
  01/28/13
I disagree here. The emancipation proclamation and the 13th...
Copper Center
  01/28/13
they very quickly gutted those "accomplishments" i...
spectacular set
  01/28/13
This is kinda bullshit. Lincoln, and many in the north, had ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
We're not talking about racism, we're talking about slavery....
Copper Center
  01/28/13
I was addressing "The North couldn't have known at the ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
OK fair enough.
Copper Center
  01/28/13
T Only retards say F and try to act smart. These people ...
splenetic bateful wrinkle lettuce
  01/28/13
...
Tutu-fueled Red PissWang Rampage
  02/07/25
Neither undisputedly T nor F. If you asked those who volunt...
azure roast beef field
  01/28/13
and the people who served in Iraq would say they fought for ...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
Pretty sure your post begs the question, bro.
azure roast beef field
  01/28/13
What about states rights re: Quadrupling of tariffs (the maj...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
did the South offer to free the slaves in exchange for lower...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
Lincoln was not budging on Tariffs. Go back and look at his ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
Understanding why the South seceded isn't the same as unders...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
ok this post was the one that made me realize i really need ...
Dashing nowag
  01/28/13
Sorry about your narrow-minded, revisionist perspective.
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
He is dead on. Speaks volumes about your shitty schooling th...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
If Lincoln had let the crackers secede, there would be no Un...
Copper Center
  01/28/13
This worst case long-term scenario makes it a given that the...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
closer to 700 now, let alone the rape and destruction. Just ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
Yes.
Copper Center
  01/28/13
You're a cold and twisted person.
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
Go tell your mama all about it, son.
Copper Center
  01/28/13
just do let half the country walk away without lifting a fin...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
I'm glad you would have been jeering on George to send more ...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
what? of course the british had to do that. what the fuck ki...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
If any dictator makes a different decision today, we call hi...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
its almost like cultural, political, and social norms are di...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
Great, so we're in agreement that the North's decision to mi...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
how is that at all relevant to the cause of the civil war? p...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
You're overstating how infeasible allowing secession would'v...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
cr
Copper Center
  01/28/13
Slavery is probably TCR if you had to distill it down to one...
aromatic business firm
  01/28/13
F
hairless medicated sneaky criminal
  01/28/13
F The South seceded because of slavery. The north did not i...
Sienna fortuitous meteor
  01/28/13
Without slavery, pretty sure there's no war. What would the...
bonkers kink-friendly locus party of the first part
  01/28/13
Tariffs bro. And Lincoln's mercantalist pro-north anti-south...
Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel
  01/28/13
"A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, a...
ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage
  01/28/13
not really speaking of people here, but i love the typical l...
Opaque Stead Turdskin
  01/28/13
I'm glad you found something to love.
Copper Center
  01/28/13
everybody needs someone or something to love, bro. it's, ...
Opaque Stead Turdskin
  01/28/13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8VCbvMoCV8
bearded vivacious trailer park national security agency
  01/28/13
came here to post this. nice
boyish principal's office
  01/28/13
i don't think i'm a precog, but this thread definitely deliv...
Trip Police Squad
  01/28/13
Plant the seed, give it a little water...
titillating anal home mexican
  01/28/13
...
Hot lay fat ankles
  12/29/23
bump for the retarded cumskin fuck: http://www.xoxohth.co...
Hot lay fat ankles
  12/29/23
sure glad cumskins are repetitively making the trillionth it...
nyuug
  02/07/25
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5676744&fo...
nyuug
  02/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:16 PM
Author: titillating anal home mexican



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523170)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:16 PM
Author: Arousing Church

T

Anyone who says F is wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523176)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:19 PM
Author: Coral Chad

Obviously. Only retarded Southerners trying to justify their treasonous past argue otherwise.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523201)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:20 PM
Author: comical jade becky

(nebbish tristate jew)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523211)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:21 PM
Author: Coral Chad

Bro, I am most assuredly NOT a member of the tribe.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523227)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 7th, 2025 4:18 AM
Author: Pajeet 2025

(Chosen person)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#48631586)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:23 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union." - Lincoln (Letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862)

You realize it is basically impossible for a conflict to be about a certain issue when one side is willing to totally compromise on said issue in order to avoid conflict.

Slavery was merely used as a wedge issue on both sides to rile their people up (i.e. Alabama saying: der gonna take our slaves!) once it became clear conflict due to OTHER reasons was going to occur. Believing slavery was the actual issue is akin to believing that the Germans coming over and spearing babies on bayonets was the reason America entered WW1.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523245)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:24 PM
Author: bronze french chef

pizza

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523258)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:25 PM
Author: Coral Chad

u seem dumb bro.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523275)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:28 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

****DO NOT READ**** ****WILL INSTANTLY MAKE YOU DUMBER****

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523299)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:36 PM
Author: maroon 180 son of senegal

lol saying that the civil war was about slavery doesn't mean you think lincoln was like "we need to start a war to free the slaves"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523364)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:38 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

How can a conflict stem from something for which one party is willing to do whatever the other side wants on that issue?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523385)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:39 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

do you understand how politics works?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523395)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:42 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

Yea, if you and I are sitting at a bargaining table and I say "I know you care about this X issue alot, so do whatever you have to so long as we stick together", if you subsequently decide to break apart, X issue cannot be the cause.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523413)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:48 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

that's the point, dipshit. no one wanted a war but it was inevitable because the slavery issue had reached a climax and there was no way around it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523478)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:49 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

How can an issue reach a climax with no way around when one side says that they are ok with whatever the otherside wants to do on that issue?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523486)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:52 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

are you actually this stupid?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523510)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:54 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

You have yet to show how an issue for which one side is willing to totally compromise on, can be what causes a conflict.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523529)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:56 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

"when one side says that they are ok with whatever the other side wants to do on that issue?" you are an idiot who needs to go back to grade school history class.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523542)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:56 PM
Author: white potus circlehead

the slavery issue had been ramping up for 40 years (see missouri compromise, bleeding kansas etc). lincoln's thoughts did not represent those of his countrymen and were irrelevant

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523543)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:00 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

lol. Abolition did not have the widespread support people are now trying rewrite into Northern history.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523589)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:15 PM
Author: white potus circlehead

you're canadian, i get it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523756)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:57 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

Letting the South secede was a way around it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523564)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:01 PM
Author: maroon 180 son of senegal

brother, are you from this country? when people say the civil war was about slavery, they don't mean that the goal of the war was to "free the slaves." the emancipation proclamation was like 2 years into the war

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523614)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:04 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

Sure, being "about slavery" does not necessarily mean one side is "free" and the otherside is "no u". However, if one side is "Do w.e. you want about slaves, I just don't want you to leave for any reason" and the otherside does leave, that kind kicks the whole slave thing in the head.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523641)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:05 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

except that the other side still said "fuck you we're leaving explicitly because we think you are going to fuck with our slave rights."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523659)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:07 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

This goes back to the germans with bayonets. The "Der gunna take our nigs" was a useful tool to rile up the base, but don't mistake it for true cause. The Southern guys at the table with Lincoln pre-secession new damn well that he did not give a shit about slaves.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523681)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:10 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

how was that a useful tool to rile up the "base," whatever the fuck you mean by that, when the "base" was cracker dirt farmers who couldnt afford slaves. the states rights proxy was the propaganda to stir the base into believing they were fighting to keep their homes free. jesus fucking christ on a fucking cracker how much more goddamn stupidly contentious can you get you cum slurping maple leaf faggot?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523703)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:19 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

Without slaves, cracker dirt farmers would've been at the bottom of the social food chain. They wanted to keep having a group to look down on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523794)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:16 PM
Author: maroon 180 son of senegal

"Do w.e. you want about slaves"

"do whatever you want about slaves/slavery" is different than "do whatever you want about YOUR slaves." slavery in the south, as it already existed, wasn't really the issue. what got everyone heated in the years leading up to the war was controversy over slavery in the new territories. and the southern dweebs were all upset that this would eventually threaten slavery in the south, too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523762)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:37 PM
Author: white potus circlehead

but but but

In this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any Country. It is useless to expatiate on its disadvantages. I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence.

—Robert E. Lee, to Mary Anna Lee, December 27, 1856

conclusive PROOF here that the civil war was definitely not about slavery at all



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523371)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:39 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

i really hope you are being sarcastic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523391)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:40 PM
Author: white potus circlehead

i'm just thinking smart bro. just like cgm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523399)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:44 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

If a mom says to a kid "Don't cry, take all the candy you want" and the child begins to cry, on what fucking planet would you have to live on for candy to be what made the kid cry?

The Lincoln quote is bulletproof because it shows that he was totally open to negotiation and would probably have agreed with the South on any slavery policy they wanted. THEREFORE, when they went to war it must have been about something else.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523439)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:58 PM
Author: maroon 180 son of senegal

lol BULLETPROOF

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523579)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:02 PM
Author: cerise mind-boggling menage coffee pot

i can't tell if you're being serious

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523627)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:12 PM
Author: low-t motley electric furnace stage

A huge point of contention and a major cause of problems before the war was expanding slavery into new territories, which the south wanted to do and the north was opposed to for a whole bunch of reasons. The north clearly would not have let that slide. You're also putting way too much behind that one Lincoln quote; don't you think there may be slightly more nuance to the conflict that can't be encapsulated in one quote? You need to stop because you sound unbelievably ignorant of very basic facts of American history.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523730)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:16 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

being astonishingly ignorant about basic facts has never stopped CGM from launching into massive analogy and question begging screeds

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523759)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:19 PM
Author: low-t motley electric furnace stage

True but this is by far the most ignorant nonsense I've ever seen him post. It's obvious that he hasn't taken an am hist class and knows everything he does about the civil war from lewrockwell.com.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523792)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:13 PM
Author: Abnormal stock car

oh god, you are so stupid

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523737)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:18 PM
Author: comical jade becky

(bro who pulled a C in HS US history)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523185)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:19 PM
Author: titillating anal home mexican

OH WHAT A CIVIL WAR SCHOLAR!!!!!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523191)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:19 PM
Author: big-titted hall love of her life

It is January 1864, and the Confederacy is losing the war against the United States. Men with strange accents and oddly mottled clothing approach Robert E. Lee at the headquarters of the Army of Northern Virginia, demonstrating a rifle far superior to all other firearms of the time. The men call their organization "America Will Break" (or "AWB"), and offer to supply the Confederate army with these rifles, which they refer to as AK-47s. The weapons operate on chemical and engineering principles unknown to Confederate military engineers.

Soldiers are trained by the AWB men to use their new weapons, and ammunition is issued. Confederate morale improves considerably as the men prepare to meet Union forces in the 1864 campaign. They soon engage General Grant's men at the Battle of the Wilderness, and inflict a devastating defeat on Union forces.

The AWB establish a base in the little town of Rivington, making it into a combined fortress and arsenal. They continue to offer inexplicable information and technology to the Confederacy, even providing Lee with nitroglycerin pills, which ease his frequent chest pains. Finally, Lee questions their leader, Andries Rhoodie, who ultimately decides to tell Lee the truth. The men of AWB are time travelers from the year 2014, the 21st-century. The newcomers claim that white supremacy has not endured to the modern era, and that blacks in the future will eclipse whites. Lee is informed that unless a slave-holding South is allowed to endure into the 20th century, blacks will take over the world. A slave-owner himself, Lee is surprised by this revelation—he never thought Negroes capable of participating in government.

With the AWB's guns and some direct military aid from the time-traveling South Africans, the Army of Northern Virginia drives Ulysses Grant's forces out of Virginia and in a surprise night attack captures Washington, D.C., thus ending the Civil War. The United Kingdom and France recognize the Confederacy and President Lincoln is forced to accept Southern victory. As Confederate forces begin to end their occupation of Washington, the new country starts to determine its future social and political direction.

In negotiations between the two Americas, to which Lee is made a representative for the CSA, the United States agrees to pay millions of dollars in reparations, albeit reluctantly. The Confederacy, in turn, gives up any claim to Maryland and West Virginia. After much debate, both sides agree for Kentucky and Missouri to hold elections and determine whether they will remain in the Union or secede. Supporters, both official and unofficial, pour into both states and try to sway voters their way. Ultimately, despite an assassination attempt on Lee by a former slave and efforts at rigging elections by the Rivington men, Kentucky secedes and Missouri remains in the Union.

Confederate slaves freed during the war by Union troops violently resist returning to slavery. Lee, already dubious about slavery and respectful of the courage of the United States Colored Troops during the war, becomes convinced that continuing to enslave Negroes is both wrong and impracticable. The genie is already out of the bottle, and black guerrillas will continue to make trouble in the future. Some parts of the South had already lost many of their slaves during the war anyway. Despite threats by the Rivington men, Lee makes no effort to hide his views as he runs for president in 1867. The Rivington men convince Nathan Bedford Forrest to run against Lee on a pro-slavery ticket, and pour their considerable resources into Forrest's campaign. When Lee manages a narrow victory, Forrest respectfully concedes defeat and promises to help rally the young nation behind its new president.

At Lee's inauguration, AWB men attempt to assassinate him using Uzis, resulting in the death of Lee's wife, Mary; his vice president, Albert Gallatin Brown; various dignitaries and generals; and many civilians. The AWB offices in Richmond are seized after a fierce battle, and Lee enters the stronghold to find more technological marvels (such as light bulbs), along with a collection of books that document the increasing marginalization of racism from 1865 into the 21st century. Lee shows these books to Confederate congressmen, hoping that the future's nearly universal condemnation of slavery will convince the congressmen to vote for his plan for gradual abolition.

Confederate forces surround Rivington and after a long siege capture the town. Confederate infantry destroy the AWB's time machine during the fighting, prompting the rest to lose hope and surrender. Andries Rhoodie is killed by an enraged slave, who the Confederates, well aware of the Rivington men's cruelty and treason, spare. In Richmond, the Confederate Congress passes President Lee's abolition bill. Contemporaries have reproduced the nitroglycerin pills brought by the AWB, and Lee hopes, with their help, to live to see the effects of his plan for emancipation. Meanwhile, a few of the stranded South Africans agree to help the Confederacy replicate their 21st century technology from 2014, helping Lee to counter the Union's own replica AK-47's and greater industrial strength. Though the Union has started a war with the British Empire by invading Canada and Lee fears the Union may attempt a war of revenge against the CSA in the future, he rests assured that the CSA will remain the most technologically-advanced nation in the world for many decades to come.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523203)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:29 PM
Author: Well-lubricated Beady-eyed Public Bath

(Glenn Beck)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523300)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:50 PM
Author: Opaque Stead Turdskin

lol @ turtledove.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523493)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:20 PM
Author: Filthy library windowlicker

You must be from the south.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523216)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:25 PM
Author: titillating anal home mexican

Born and raised in rural Georgia

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523264)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:20 PM
Author: Copper Center

True... with states rights as a proxy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523222)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:21 PM
Author: Coral Chad

Proxy? More like pre-text.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523234)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:26 PM
Author: Copper Center

The Civil War was about states' rights. But the "right" to own slaves was the straw that broke the camel's back.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523281)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:53 PM
Author: Cream autistic dragon

Tcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523528)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:55 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

the Civil War was about states rights like the Iraq War was about are freedom.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523534)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:56 PM
Author: Copper Center

Dumb analogy.

Southerners started the war because a) they're idiots, and b) they thought their sovereignty was threatened by the North.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523552)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:06 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

you just didn't understand it. do you think the south would have been better off saying that they're fighting for "the continuing subjugation of niggers?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523671)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:10 PM
Author: Copper Center

No, but since cognitive dissonance is as common as grits in the South, what they have to say has little weight in an analysis of the war.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523700)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:12 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

their leaders were not stupid and they were just as much politicians as the north's leaders were. they chose their words carefully and framed what the fight was about to gain the higher moral ground or, more importantly, not to allow the opponent to gain it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523727)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:17 PM
Author: Copper Center

And that blew up in their face, didn't it?

Like I said, cognitive dissonance is a staple of Southern culture. You cannot rally for freedom around your supposed right to enslave people. It just doesn't work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523769)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:11 PM
Author: cerise mind-boggling menage coffee pot

good analogy, frankly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523721)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:25 PM
Author: Multi-colored main people

there's no a single war in history that was about just one thing. social tension is a pretty complicated beast.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523268)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:28 PM
Author: effete den dog poop

F, the civil war was fought of, by, and for Federalism.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523297)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:30 PM
Author: spectacular set

The civil war was fought to keep the south impoverished and non-competitive with the North, and abolishing slavery was part of that aim.

the fact that there were no real civil rights that came from the war and the abolishment of slavery should show you that the north couldn't give two shits about the well being of slaves.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523312)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:33 PM
Author: Copper Center

I disagree here. The emancipation proclamation and the 13th amendment were solid achievements of the Civil War. The North couldn't have known at the time how clever Southerners would be with their legalistic Jim Crow bullshit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523338)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:37 PM
Author: spectacular set

they very quickly gutted those "accomplishments" in a way that allowed everyone to go on their merry way without blacks getting real rights or protections.

as long as the south agreed to be good little boys and accept northern industrial dominance, the "union" was saved and no one really cared about the black doods trying to run farms.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523372)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:37 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

This is kinda bullshit. Lincoln, and many in the north, had to be cajoled into going along with the 13th. The North was also just as bad when it came to racism post Civil-war. It just came in a different flavour. Instead of segregation of the sort you saw in the south, for example, you had forced black unemployment thanks to union control over construction contracts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523378)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:39 PM
Author: Copper Center

We're not talking about racism, we're talking about slavery. These are not the same thing. Having a legal right to own a human being is not the same thing as thinking blacks are inferior.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523394)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:46 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

I was addressing "The North couldn't have known at the time how clever Southerners would be with their legalistic Jim Crow bullshit", as if Southern behaviour towards blacks post CW can be looked down upon by Northerners.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523450)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:52 PM
Author: Copper Center

OK fair enough.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523499)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:32 PM
Author: splenetic bateful wrinkle lettuce

T

Only retards say F and try to act smart. These people also use words like "proactive" and "paradigm"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523331)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 7th, 2025 4:39 AM
Author: Tutu-fueled Red PissWang Rampage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#48631597)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:34 PM
Author: azure roast beef field

Neither undisputedly T nor F. If you asked those who volunteered and fought, probably the majority of confederates would say something besides slavery like states' rights, and the majority of union soldiers would probably say something else besides freeing the slaves, because abolitionism wasn't as widespread in the north as revisionist accounts suggest. At the same time, slavery is probably a but-for cause of the war among the decisionmakers responsible for seceding.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523348)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:45 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

and the people who served in Iraq would say they fought for our freedom. what's your fucking point? why are people on this site so stupid? if being against states rights was the stance to take in order to maintain the institution of slavery then the south would have been against states rights and if being for states rights was the stance to take for the abolition of slavery then the north would have been for states rights.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523440)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:47 PM
Author: azure roast beef field

Pretty sure your post begs the question, bro.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523459)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:48 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

What about states rights re: Quadrupling of tariffs (the major taxes during that time) which hit the mostly southern ports? How does that play into your calculus?

Or should I leave you alone with your "I'm going to assume it was about slavery and then back into state's rights in two different ways to show how to was still about slavery" logical masterpiece.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523481)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:51 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

did the South offer to free the slaves in exchange for lowering the tarrifs? or was the slave issue non-negotiable in the South's eyes? answer those questions and you'll arrive at the (obvious) answer to the OP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523495)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:53 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

Lincoln was not budging on Tariffs. Go back and look at his speeches. His mercantalist economic police was the bedrock of his policy goals as a politician. He did however not give a shit about slavery and was willing to bend whichever way he needed to on it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523521)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:56 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

Understanding why the South seceded isn't the same as understanding why the Civil War happened. There wouldn't have been a war if the North hadn't invaded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523545)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:58 PM
Author: Dashing nowag

ok this post was the one that made me realize i really need to walk away from this thread. for that, i thank you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523568)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:02 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

Sorry about your narrow-minded, revisionist perspective.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523622)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:02 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

He is dead on. Speaks volumes about your shitty schooling that you seem to take for granted that a war was inevitable. As if the idea that some of the states leaving the voluntary union necessitated violence ala George III style.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523624)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:05 PM
Author: Copper Center

If Lincoln had let the crackers secede, there would be no United States today. The North would be a part of Canada, and the South would be 30 different countries which make Guatemala look civilized. Europe would still rule the world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523661)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:07 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

This worst case long-term scenario makes it a given that the government had to enter a conflict that killed 500,000 Americans?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523682)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:08 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

closer to 700 now, let alone the rape and destruction. Just look @ Sherman's as merely one example.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523692)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:10 PM
Author: Copper Center

Yes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523710)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:13 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

You're a cold and twisted person.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523735)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:18 PM
Author: Copper Center

Go tell your mama all about it, son.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523779)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:07 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

just do let half the country walk away without lifting a finger bro

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523677)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:10 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

I'm glad you would have been jeering on George to send more troops to the colonies, can't have them walking away without lifting a finger either!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523709)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:12 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

what? of course the british had to do that. what the fuck kind of stupid shit are you that you think this is going to be any kind of incisive point

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523728)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:12 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

If any dictator makes a different decision today, we call him a genocidal maniac.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523729)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:15 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

its almost like cultural, political, and social norms are different now than they were 150 years ago, fucking how do magnets work man

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523745)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:17 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

Great, so we're in agreement that the North's decision to militarily prevent secession violates modern ethics.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523776)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:21 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

how is that at all relevant to the cause of the civil war? political reality at the time was that no country could feasibly allow half of its territory to walk away. the southern states walked away. they all explicitly said as they walked away that we are walking away because we think you are going to interfere with our slaveowning.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523804)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:28 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

You're overstating how infeasible allowing secession would've been, but even if you're right, you're coming to the wrong conclusion. Just because Northern actions were politically encouraged doesn't mean they weren't a cause.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523869)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:03 PM
Author: Copper Center

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523629)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:40 PM
Author: aromatic business firm

Slavery is probably TCR if you had to distill it down to one "cause." Although the larger view would be that the South had little to no say over national elections or issues anymore and the prospect losing slavery was one consequence of that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523398)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:48 PM
Author: hairless medicated sneaky criminal

F

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523475)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:49 PM
Author: Sienna fortuitous meteor

F

The South seceded because of slavery. The north did not invade because of slavery. True or false depends on your interpretation of which act started the war.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523485)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:52 PM
Author: bonkers kink-friendly locus party of the first part

Without slavery, pretty sure there's no war. What would the war be about?

All that economic revisionism is still based on slavery.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523500)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:56 PM
Author: Rambunctious Ruby Digit Ratio Chapel

Tariffs bro. And Lincoln's mercantalist pro-north anti-south stance in general.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523546)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:54 PM
Author: ultramarine mischievous cuckoldry stage

"A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.

This sectional combination for the submersion of the Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its beliefs and safety.

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.

The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.

Sectional interest and animosity will deepen the irritation, and all hope of remedy is rendered vain, by the fact that public opinion at the North has invested a great political error with the sanction of more erroneous religious belief.

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved, and that the State of South Carolina has resumed her position among the nations of the world, as a separate and independent State; with full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523530)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:57 PM
Author: Opaque Stead Turdskin

not really speaking of people here, but i love the typical leftist types that screamed "NO BLOOD FOR OIL!" and decry the military-industrial complex in contemporary wars, yet never seek to apply the same sort of analysis to past wars.

especially the civil war and ww2 because those were the "good" wars.

i'm pretty certain northern industrialists and politicians made out like bandits as a result of the war, either garnering lucrative contracts or getting to send a bunch of surplus micks to go die on bloody battlefields.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523558)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:01 PM
Author: Copper Center

I'm glad you found something to love.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523613)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:08 PM
Author: Opaque Stead Turdskin

everybody needs someone or something to love, bro.

it's, like, part of the human condition maaaahhhn.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523689)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 10:57 PM
Author: bearded vivacious trailer park national security agency

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8VCbvMoCV8

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523560)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:02 PM
Author: boyish principal's office

came here to post this. nice

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523623)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:04 PM
Author: Trip Police Squad

i don't think i'm a precog, but this thread definitely delivered the CGM lulz i expected

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523639)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 28th, 2013 11:30 PM
Author: titillating anal home mexican

Plant the seed, give it a little water...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#22523887)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 29th, 2023 1:20 AM
Author: Hot lay fat ankles



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#47225469)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 29th, 2023 1:21 AM
Author: Hot lay fat ankles

bump for the retarded cumskin fuck:

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5467300&mc=4&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#47225472)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 7th, 2025 3:16 AM
Author: nyuug (Gangnam WGWAG Playboy)

sure glad cumskins are repetitively making the trillionth iteration of this thread in 2025 whilst accusing NYUUG of being REPETITIVE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#48631551)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 7th, 2025 3:16 AM
Author: nyuug (Gangnam WGWAG Playboy)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5676744&forum_id=2#48631471

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2170358&forum_id=2#48631553)