this is retarded conspiracy babble. the fact that the origins of an airborne toxic event could not be covered up forever because of independent scientists and research is not a particularly strong argument for "the government has a cure of cancer but keeps it secret."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866626)

You using "government has a cure for cancer" is just a strawman now for the obvious truths you are denying in every other part of the discussion. There doesn't have to be a "one syringe that gets rid of this malady" panacea in existence for the essence of the claim to be true. I'm saying we have the math, physics, chemistry, bio to cure just about anything, that that knowledge is not available to the public and is suppressed by -- literally, by reddit midwit skeptical culture and "debunkers" -- and that the cures don't happen because projects that veer toward that territory get quietly redirected or derailed or sandboxed due to their disruptive nature and due to power balance and wealth interests.

Your argument amounts to "I have never seen this stuff before or encountered it so it must not exist". Nah, sorry to break it to you but it does. The fact that you deny it when we live in a time where the govt literally came out and said "UAP are real", and people barely reacted should be proof enough. People are brainwashed to the extent they can sit up there with a PSA megaphone and shout about suppressed knowledge, and people are too fatigured and braindead to react, no matter how disruptive the knowledge is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866796)

classified technology is classified for security and intelligence reasons. there are a bunch of organizations both inside and outside the united states that do cancer research. it is unthinkable that the government could develop a cure for cancer without the scientific community becoming aware. this would be a massive undertaking and require the government poaching a bunch of cancer scientists who are totally chill with developing a cure and keeping it secret. it would require no other organization discovering the cure too, despite the obvious profit motives they have. it would require the government undertaking this massive project only to keep it classified for some conspiratorial reason. and it would require every single researcher and administrator never spilling the beans, and for some reason taking the secret to the grave even though many will be personally affected by cancer.

this is stupid and not worthy of engagement. and repeating "you know the government does develop classified tech!?" doesn't persuade me to engage you because repeating something so obvious as if it's meaningful just demonstrates how unserious and retarded you are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866852)

Your claim that it would require some huge manhattan project level undertaking is two things - sleight of hand because as I have explained if it would be trivial to come up with working treatments and we don’t do it then that’s not effectively different from a literal cure existing. And 2nd it shows you have been conditioned if you think the ape consensus + institutional gatekeeping model of advancement is anything more than soft containment and ego preservation. Tell me how much did knowledge advance during the enlightenment? How many tomes of advanced math came out of Paris during a few short centuries? You realize a single chemist fluent in gauge theory could change everything right? Stuff advances behind closed doors. The stuff that leaks to the public is the tip of the iceberg. Cancer treatment is not unobtainable or impressive.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48869553)