Blake Neff

@BlakeSNeff

TuckerCarlson tells the story of how I got doxxed and fired from Fox News, and Charlie Kirk gave me a second chance.

Until now, I've never tweeted. But Charlie is gone now. It is my duty to help people remember him.

https://x.com/BlakeSNeff/status/1969187064257110340

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285281)

I'm almost done writing a stylometric analysis tool for my job. I'll run this poaster's content through it and see what we get.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285524)

btw before you accuse me of being benzo, note that I'm a different quotemo than the above quotemo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285535)

That’s influence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285306)

and I just followed him

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285471)

lfg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285310)

https://i.imgur.com/9jWBPgy.jpeg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285329)

https://x.com/GodCloseMyEyes/status/1968496441107587286?t=gU2N85j3DplbjlIhU6896A&s=19

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285362)

Amazing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285328)

that's what tucker said blake said. that's as close as he came to denouncing blake on the air. and it really isn't what blake said.

here is a contemporaneous take on the situation. note how many falsehoods and incorrect assumptions these dipshits make

just like xoxo libs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5Vk5fxptUo Words Were Wrong?!? Roland Deconstructs Tucker's Response To Racist Writer Blake Neff's Resignation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49286874)

https://x.com/SarahRaney6/status/1969199611991425253

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285430)

Hair is flame

He’s gonna maek it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285447)

Does Tucker seem like schtick to you or real? Because of what happened I think forgiveness is in order but I just have a gut feeling Tucker is fake.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285519)

I'm not some gay bashing reptile but Kirk was a decent human and a model of integrity and what conservative political advocacy should look like.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285538)

So is a former Florida Republican state senator whom I'm now sure is a poaster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285497)

halperin is a famous journalist who was behind the show featured in this hit thread (https://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3168002&mc=106&forum_id=2)

yang is a random tweetdood who doesnt like trannies and almost certainly poasts

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49285548)

saagar is krystal ball's and ryan grim's controlled gay populist cuck

nobody on the serious right with a large audience had more milquetoast, lukewarm, normie-adjacent views than charlie kirk, whose callowness made him the least offensive and most harmless of them all. if you cannot countenance him you cannot countenance anything on the right, there is no such thing as a serious and legitimately incisive right-wing commentator that you would not dismiss as ipso facto disrespectful.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49286431)

this is the real problem with libs today, not so much that you are somehow inherently violent but that you are unwilling to form a coherent theory of mind for half the country and would rather take comfort in the thought that even mainstream figures on the right are simply comic book-level villains with no grounding thoughts or motives except a desire to rub their hands and cackle like the joker, which is obviously a retarded thought that is too stupid to be genuinely believed by someone willing to be honest with themselves.

if you have to embrace an idea so juvenile and retarded you’re doing so not because it’s the most reasonable conclusion but because it’s the most convenient and lets you ignore something uglier that you’d rather not consciously acknowledge, which in this case is probably that you are brown and full of insecurity, or jewish or crypto-jewish and full of disdain for white guys with southern accents, or a hysterical woman, or some other resentful grievance group.

you should just admit that the image of white middle america fills you with visceral disgust and hate, that you see them as a different species and a different people in the same way greeks see turks, and would never permit the thought of living side-by-side with them in harmony not for any logical reason but because they are loathsome turks.

you should stop trying to rationalize your fake virtue and instead admit your hate. but you cannot so instead you say they are all little comic book hitlers and turn to violence to look away from your own frightening ugliness.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49286792)

The figures on the right are more grifterish than villainous. Charles is smart enough to understand that the right-wing ecosystem isn't exactly devoted to sensible, grounded rhetoric that elevates political discussion. It's fair to criticize people who participate in the grift.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49287018)

charles worked for someone whose right-side ecosystem was exactly devoted to sensible, grounded rhetoric that elevated the political discussion

if you want to criticize people who participate 'in the grift' that would make you one of one, but it would also require you to explain the grift

for example, if i called the lefty bullshit a grift, i could easily elaborate. for example, trannies in girl sports

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777748&forum_id=2#49287244)