ImageDean Baquet, wearing glasses and a blue suit, holding a mockup of a New York Times front page with a headline reading “Madam President” and, in smaller type, two lines below that: “Clinton Defeats Trump in Historic Victory; Democrats in Close Race to Retake Senate.” Below that is a large gray space and other, smaller headlines and articles.
It is widely accepted that the print front page does not have the power it once did — except for historic events like the election of a new president. It is a keepsake, a memento. So there is enormous pressure to come up with the perfect headline, one that will stand up to time.
“Madam President” was just that. It didn’t have the candidate’s name. It did not have to. Those two words caught the fact that America had chosen its first female leader. It was the formal title that would be used in official settings. And the accompanying stories were designed to dwell on the moment, on the changing role of women in society, politics and power. There was even a full discussion over what to call her husband, a former president.
The Front Page That Never Was
Sept. 30, 2026
Except none of it was ever published, because to the surprise of most of us in the newsroom, and even to the ultimate winner, Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to Donald J. Trump.
That night in the newsroom — the tossing of stories and the frantic creation of new ones — was a first sign of the confusion and the chaos that would come to characterize American elections for the next decade. Chaos is the right word. The place was filled with guests, friends and spouses who assumed they would witness the election of the first woman as president.
I remember feeling conflicted, the editor’s curiosity mixed with the shock that newsrooms nationwide had missed something large. But the overall impulse was to fix the thing, to tear up the paper and start all over again — which is what we set about doing.
We almost always prepare two front pages — in fact two full packages of stories — for presidential elections. It would be hard if not impossible to ready the mix of analysis and biography right up against the deadline. American elections are usually pretty close. Mostly there are no surprises, and the perfunctory stories about the losing candidate are set aside. There was in fact a special section ready to go after George W. Bush defeated Al Gore, but the presses were stopped, and the papers were scrapped when Gore withdrew his concession.
But in the case of Clinton versus Trump, very little effort was put into the possibility that Trump would win. Most of us believed that it was highly unlikely; almost all polls and conventional political wisdom had Trump losing to Clinton.
No “Trump Wins” headline was prepared in advance. It was a lesson, one that would influence reporting in America for the next 10 years. Polls are fine, but nothing beats getting out and talking to people. There had been an enormous shift in the country, and most of the press and political pundits had missed it.
But that night started in typical fashion. Newsrooms are largely quiet as the votes come on election night. The stories are mostly written. Fast food is served to the editors and the writers waiting for results. Typical fare is pizza.
Trip Gabriel, a reporter assigned to cover voters, recalled being less certain of a Clinton victory. He had seen signs in his travels, but he, too, expected Trump to lose. Trip’s election night assignment was to talk to the mourning Trump voters, at a working-class bar in Ambridge, Pa., a struggling steel town.
The bar patrons in Ambridge were not paying much attention to the television coverage droning on. There was a ferocious dart game underway. And they certainly were not mourning, since they were convinced Trump would win.
“Everywhere you went there were nothing but Trump signs,” Trip recalled of that part of the state.
Back in the New York newsroom, we had to scramble. Reporters and senior leaders huddled around the Politics desk, staring into their phones or at computers as surprising vote tallies started to come in from Florida and elsewhere. Suddenly a race that was to end early was getting close. I called reporters to ask what they were hearing, including one who was in touch with the people around Senator Mitch McConnell. The Republicans remained certain that Trump would lose.
But then the numbers came in.
In Pennsylvania, Trip got a frantic call from an editor. “Oh my God,” the editor said. “He is going to win.”
Trip sat in his rental car in the parking lot of the bar and, in about 45 minutes, tapped out a story that would eventually make the front page under the headline “A Blue-Collar Town in Decline and in Despair Turns to Trump.”
The “Madam President” headline was scrapped for “Trump Triumphs.”
Dean Baquet was the executive editor of The New York Times from 2014 to 2022. He now leads The Times’s Local Investigations Fellowship.