Trump is clearly entitled to a directed verdict in the NY case
| Rough-skinned Arrogant Partner Casino | 05/21/24 | | bipolar histrionic library | 05/21/24 | | irradiated old irish cottage | 05/21/24 | | Big Beta Brunch Boistinker | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | Dead emerald trailer park | 05/21/24 | | bipolar histrionic library | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | vibrant station | 05/21/24 | | bipolar histrionic library | 05/21/24 | | soul-stirring skinny woman | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | soul-stirring skinny woman | 05/21/24 | | Pungent hissy fit | 05/21/24 | | soul-stirring skinny woman | 05/21/24 | | vibrant station | 05/21/24 | | soul-stirring skinny woman | 05/21/24 | | vibrant station | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | vibrant station | 05/21/24 | | bipolar histrionic library | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | vibrant station | 05/21/24 | | Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay | 05/21/24 | | vibrant station | 05/21/24 | | Cerebral Mediation | 05/21/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 21st, 2024 3:54 PM Author: soul-stirring skinny woman
"You must remember, the People are not required to prove these offenses beyond a reasonable doubt; therefore, that reduces the need or the burden to define every term and every phrase," Merchan said, per Vance's blog. Merchan made the comment while discussing whether the defense could call an expert in campaign finance law.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-merchan-tipped-his-hand-on-key-issue-attorney/ar-BB1mLWxJ
======
can someone walk me through this? if that's so, then what proof would Trump be on notice to provide to contradict something that the prosecution doesn't even have to define?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5531101&forum_id=2#47680538)
|
|
Date: May 21st, 2024 4:19 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Henna Hairy Legs Lay
yes. i posted the prosecutions motion on this when they were defending the indictment, but they literally argued, and the judge accepted, that defining what the second crime was would "limit their prosecution's strategies."
it makes sense when you consider that when these cases are brought it's obvious that the falsifier was up to something. if you had business records with material falsifications that could not have occurred by accident, it may be obvious you had criminal intent, even though i might not be able to prove how or who you were trying to defraud. for example, let's say that i falsified my assets in case i had an insurance claim, but i never made such a claim, then i would still be guilty here.
the only reason it's ridiculous here is because of how attenuated the case is at every level.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5531101&forum_id=2#47680604) |
Date: May 21st, 2024 4:51 PM Author: Cerebral Mediation
Law noob here. Do state court judges usually granted directed verdicts in criminal cases?
Does it make a difference if the judge is a Jew from New York and the defendant is Donald Trump?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5531101&forum_id=2#47680760) |
|
|