\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Taking questions on the French Revolution

...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
What happened to Marie Antoinette's head
office towers
  01/01/25
No clue. She was buried in some place they put people who ha...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
What outcome if Louis didn’t show absurd hubris on fli...
a mitigated 180
  01/01/25
Probably a more substantial war with Austria and internal re...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
...
a mitigated 180
  01/01/25
Was Danton actually guilty of any corruption or misconduct l...
Wang Hernandez
  01/01/25
Pretty much trumped up. His wife died and he started banging...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
180 response. Why were some (Danton and then Robespierre)...
Wang Hernandez
  01/01/25
There were a lot of concentric levels of power at the local ...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Very educational and 180 response.
Wang Hernandez
  01/01/25
Enjoyed this take. You can see it throughout history too - ...
fluid
  01/01/25
Robespierre believed himself to be smarter than everyone els...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
He really was a 4D chess level strategist who was always som...
fluid
  01/01/25
I think when he killed his friends he lost it. For a guy who...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
can you give us underrated parallels betwen pre-fr france an...
Bill DaWall
  01/01/25
The Kingdom of France at the time was the richest and most p...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Why was their anti-religiosity accepted so quickly?
LinkedIn Park
  01/01/25
I think because the Jacobins were all basically proto-Commun...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
am i gay?
I plan to absolutely ruin MPM
  01/01/25
France has always been gayer and more liberal than the US. I...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Some of the nuance is lost here though. I mean sure France ...
fluid
  01/01/25
Yeah it's 180. I've obviously lived this way at various poin...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Never forget the Marquis de Lafayette's paramount quote abou...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
How did Napoleon take control of the coup against the Direct...
Wang Hernandez
  01/01/25
He was extremely popular and basically controlled the milita...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
what's a decent reading list to wrap my head around the Fren...
young Boasthard
  01/01/25
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_R%C3%A9volution_fran%C3%A...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
ty friend
young Boasthard
  01/03/25
It all started off really good but extreme paranoia took hol...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/03/25
the way it totally devolves in an insane paranoiac spiral is...
young Boasthard
  01/03/25
By the Fall of Robespierre only like 50 deputies were even s...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/03/25
The Flight of the Royal Family
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Have you listened to the Revolutions podcast? Thoughts on D...
Diane Rehm talking dirty
  01/01/25
Not familiar with that one but it's probably pretty good. An...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
It’s the same guy who did The History of Rome. He prob...
Diane Rehm talking dirty
  01/01/25
The Rest is History is doing a multi part series on the FR n...
a mitigated 180
  01/01/25
They're pretty good. Lots of obscure details that are pretty...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
I enjoy the erudite Oxfordian joking and banter.
a mitigated 180
  01/01/25
The English are utterly contemptible but I will give it to t...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Will check it out thx
Diane Rehm talking dirty
  01/01/25
What were King Louis XVI’s biggest fuck-ups (before th...
....,,....,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.......,.,.,.,.,..,.
  01/01/25
I mean that's mostly it. He probably shouldn't have fired Ja...
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
Have you researched the part played by Freemasons, or the Je...
"'''''"'""'''"'"'
  01/01/25
Not sure. I don't think there's any evidence of this.
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
What happened to Lavoisier’s head?
fluid
  01/01/25
Who cares?
regular guy
  01/01/25
Wordcels gonna wordcel
Guy sperging on a Friday
  01/01/25
🚨you’re a nigger🚨
regular guy
  01/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:14 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48506552)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:01 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507076)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:03 AM
Author: office towers

What happened to Marie Antoinette's head

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507079)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:06 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

No clue. She was buried in some place they put people who had been bad but could be forgiven in death.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507090)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:03 AM
Author: a mitigated 180

What outcome if Louis didn’t show absurd hubris on flight to Verennes and royal family escapes to join Austrian forces?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507082)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:09 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Probably a more substantial war with Austria and internal revolt. As immoral as it was to behead Louis they knew what they were doing. It's hindsight 20/20 to say hey they should have just let him go, but realistically there was a ton of support for a Bourbon restoration and it would have really fucked with things. The Vendee revolt scared the shit out of them. Ultimately they were always going to kill Louis if they could. The paranoia in Paris was beyond anything we could comprehend. They were terrified of the monarchy, of a prolonged war with Austria, etc. This is why the Girondins were viewed with such suspicion. It's easy to say yeah okay vote against beheading the king, start a bunch of wars. But what if it goes tits up and the King somehow wins? They're all getting executed if they lose. Hence, the paranoia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507099)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:30 AM
Author: a mitigated 180



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507149)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:19 AM
Author: Wang Hernandez

Was Danton actually guilty of any corruption or misconduct leading to his execution? Or was it all trumped up fraud charges?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507120)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:27 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Pretty much trumped up. His wife died and he started banging a 15 year old which made is buddies REALLY jealous. Let's be real if your buddy's wife died and he started banging a 15 year old and it wasn't technically illegal but you saw them out on the town all the time and he was just smitten and over the moon wouldn't you be like yo FUCK this ratfuck...

There was a proto-Marxist element to the Revolution where you weren't supposed to be ostentatious or live large. Like, Robespierre lived in a shitty apartment. It was part of the optics. You had to be austere and Danton was like FUCK IT I'M NIGGA RICH. Danton truly believed he was untouchable because most people thought he was untouchable. But by that stage Robespierre and Saint-Just were just disappearing people left and right for almost no reason.

The most overlooked element of the Revolution is that the sans-culottes were calling a lot of the shots. Paris itself went into a pure state of paranoia. If at any point they had sensibly moved the Convention to some other area a lot of the insanity wouldn't have happened. But here they were trying to start a country and there were like armies of starving poor people who would periodically revolt and put people's heads on pikes. Like, at one point Francois Hanriot basically told Robespierre that if he didn't arrest Brissot and his buddies he was going to kill them all lol.

But no, Danton didn't do shit wrong. He was just sort of egotistical. No one *really* grasped the level of paranoia that Robespierre descended into. After Brissot's faction were executed and Marat was killed (who was like the most insane shitlib of all time) it was just Robespierre and his buddies left and they were like okay well who else is a threat to our Pure and Brilliant ideas. Danton had the biggest following. You see, as every head rolled somebody new became the de facto opposition leader and it was Danton's bad luck that day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507133)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:45 AM
Author: Wang Hernandez

180 response.

Why were some (Danton and then Robespierre) able to effectively empower themselves with the Sans Coulette? Did the Sans Coulette itself have any structure or leadership? Or just a mob? How does one effectively leverage the desires of the mob to keep oneself in power? Just feeling the vibes of the mob?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507182)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:56 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

There were a lot of concentric levels of power at the local level. So there was the Paris Commune (the OG one not the more famous one in 1870), there were like multiple local police forces, there was a quasi sans-culottes army. It was pretty complicated. How did the Montagnards win them over? Basically because of Marat and Hebert writing pamphlets about how the poor were the GOAT important people at the center of the Revolution. A lot of this all played out in pamphlet wars. After Louis was killed, the Girondins who had been fairly radical up to that point became the de facto 'conservatives' within the National Convention, and their leader, Brissot, was pumping out pamphlets about how we ought to slow down the purges, stop killing people, we have to fight a war against the continental powers to preserve the Revolution (and the Montagnards used this as a pretext for executing him for treason because they thought the war was a backchannel to restore the monarchy, and Brissot had voted against killing Louis).

Marat was EXTREMELY influential and probably the key figure that brought Robespierre to power. While Brissot was telling people to tone it down, Marat was AMPLIFYING the paranoia and insanity. It would be like if AOC and Ted Cruz were living in a really paranoid city full of heavily armed poor people on a hair-trigger tweeting day and night that the other side ought to be arrested and executed.

Marat was the AOC of the Revolution. He was bananas. If you read his pamphlets they were just bonkers shitliberalism on steroids. Just imagine if Greta Thunberg was writing that everyone who disagreed with her views on climate change ought to be guillotined immediately. Yeah, it was pretty unhinged. Marat was very unhinged, and powerful, and the sans-culottes liked him. Later they gravitated towards Hebert too but Marat was moreso the main figure of power. The Montagnards were broadly the shitlibs that the sans-culottes liked. It was also your typical urban/rural demographic split. Brissot and the Girondins were MAGA, Marat and Robespierre were BLM. And BLM killed all the MAGA people with the help of the urban poor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507203)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: Wang Hernandez

Very educational and 180 response.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507332)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:10 PM
Author: fluid

Enjoyed this take. You can see it throughout history too - for instance - Julius Caesar - The humble conqueror becomes “dictator for life,” and the knives come out

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507918)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:17 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Robespierre believed himself to be smarter than everyone else, and in some ways, he was. He played chess when everyone else was playing checkers. He had a series of improbable wins where he miraculously ended up on the right side of a lot of issues, namely that a Republic was better than a Constitutional Monarchy, that the King was a traitor, that a prolonged war with Austria was ruinous, that the poor were the central constituent of the Revolution. He also figured out that the radicals were going to beat the moderates, that the mob could be employed to sway opinion. He had an unbelievable number of wins stacking up until the point where he had near total personal power and then he just lost it. If he had just been a little more skeptical of killing people he viewed as a threat the whole thing probably would have gone a different way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507943)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:28 PM
Author: fluid

He really was a 4D chess level strategist who was always somehow able to smear rivals as morally compromised while sticking to archetypal virtues like liberte and equalite - but the allure of the guillotine was his downfall

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507979)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:32 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

I think when he killed his friends he lost it. For a guy who was so calculating and stoic the phase of his downfall was uncharacteristically erratic. He seemed racked by guilt.

Looking back I think historians should defend him more. He created the Republic as we know it. His decisions still resonate. He was personally austere. He didn't seek power but ended up there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507994)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:20 AM
Author: Bill DaWall

can you give us underrated parallels betwen pre-fr france and now? obviously not the obvious things.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507121)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:36 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

The Kingdom of France at the time was the richest and most powerful country in human history at the time. Nearly everyone was terrified of it. A lot of English history was the story of resisting this much larger, richer, and more powerful bully that periodically kicked the shit out of them, but made them stronger by forcing them to resist.

A really big factor as to why the French Revolution turned out the way it did was that the Bourbon monarchy had been way too powerful for too long. You see, while England had the Magna Carta and then the English Civil War, France never went through a period where regular people successfully put limitations on the monarchy. It almost certainly would have collapsed sooner but not for one figure: the Sun King.

Louis XIV was an utterly transformative figure, by doubling down on the divine right of kings and absolute monarchy, while simultaneously strengthening the country. If this guy hadn't existed France probably would have had a revolution much sooner. They were really late to the game. Louis the XV accurately foresaw the collapse of the monarchy. And Louis XVI was a dud. He was just a dumb/bad ruler who didn't get it. The real move would have been to do what the English did and nab a better king from another country and cut a deal for a constitutional monarchy. This was definitely on the table. But it was one of those situations where time simply ran out on the clock and Louis XVI was not mentally prepared for such a change.

By contrast, a pretty funny story is in the Scandanavian countries they basically had a bloodless revolution. The peasants just marched to the palace one day and demanded a republic and the king was like, yeah, whatever, okay, here you go. Lol. This could have happened in France too but they were just all a little bonkers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507158)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:31 AM
Author: LinkedIn Park

Why was their anti-religiosity accepted so quickly?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507150)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:40 AM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

I think because the Jacobins were all basically proto-Communists. There are so many parallels between the Montagnards and the Soviets. Really when you think about it if you have any kind of atheistic leftism mixed with righteous indignation and paranoia you're going to get something that resembles the Bolsheviks. The Montangards believed in the blood of the workers etc. And Hebert was a quasi Bernie type of figure who thought that the poor were the most important constituency in society. It's all the same bullshit even before Marx wrote it down into a religious text.

Also, the Clergy were really rich and powerful at a time when most people were dirt poor. So, easy target. A lot of clergy were killed in the Revolution. And then a bunch of High IQ shitlib LAWMOS took over the entire country. LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507172)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 11:57 AM
Author: I plan to absolutely ruin MPM (gunneratttt)

am i gay?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507204)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 12:02 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

France has always been gayer and more liberal than the US. It's really the world's first ultra shitlib country. The government will pay for lesbian couples to have IFV babies over there. They *want* the country to become gayer and more radically left. So I think you'd fit in there. There are like 23 flavors of left wing parties over there, I'm SURE you'd find one of them appealing.

Interestingly, there are 3 separatist movements I'm aware of that are left-wing. Wales, Scotland, and Quebec have left wing nationalist movements. Most nationalist movements are right wing, but in those places their nationalist identitarian movements are like, we want to split away from our oppressors and then turn the place into Vermont or Ireland. So you'd probably fit in with these folks!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507217)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:56 PM
Author: fluid

Some of the nuance is lost here though. I mean sure France is a queer space and it also at times can be very liberal but at the same time conservative and straight af. The frenchmin is in a state of becoming not a finality and any attempt to pin him down resists containment. Also the French are chill as fuck imagine sipping lattes in Paris all day as part of an avant garde artist collectiiv that makes black and while experimental silent films that only 5 people will ever watch and the French govt is footing the bill as you sip wine and smoke Gaualloises with chill French existentialist luisian bros in constant pensive reflection? Beats the hell out of living in King Elons twitterverse that’s for sure

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507862)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:01 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Yeah it's 180. I've obviously lived this way at various points in my life.

There's actually a really cool job you can get with the French government. They pay people to simply sit around and invent things. You don't own the patent but you can get a government grant to try and invent new stuff. Just imagine the life of the mind they must live.

Similarly there are literary grants and prizes. There's one prize if you write a book that's good enough the government will take care of you for life. They're basically all poasters. It's 180 if you truly don't care about making money ever and the rat race isn't for you. But they all live in tiny homes and the water doesn't get very hot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507878)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 12:04 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Never forget the Marquis de Lafayette's paramount quote about the French Revolution: "They were just a bunch of retarded lawyers who had never been to war."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507220)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 1:02 PM
Author: Wang Hernandez

How did Napoleon take control of the coup against the Directory?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507395)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 1:31 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

He was extremely popular and basically controlled the military. He had already conquered a bunch of Italy at that point. He was a based God and everyone knew it. He also had supported the Revolution so he had good credibility. The Directory had been dealing with constant war since the Revolution began and Napoleon was a literal God of War. What were they going to do. He was on fire and just getting started.

Also there was an unbelievable amount of stupid bureaucratic and political ideas that had carried on. Napoleon showed up and hit the undo button on a metric ton (pun intended) of stupidity. He went back to the Gregorian calender, cut a deal to bring back the church but limit their political power. Lots of easy wins. People were pretty happy. Then he defeated Russia, Austria, and Germany. Icing on the cake. He was like a Pharoah. A living God.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507515)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 1:36 PM
Author: young Boasthard

what's a decent reading list to wrap my head around the French Revolution, esp through the reign of terror? I don't want to go too far back in time and don't want more than like 5 books, but always wanted to do a deep dive. also the more primary source-type stuff the better

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507533)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 1:39 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_R%C3%A9volution_fran%C3%A7aise_(film)

Just watch this incredibly long movie it's extremely accurate. If you sit through it end the end it all makes perfect sense. Starts at the beginning, ends at the end of the first major phase of the Terror.

If you want to get into the minds of the principal actors just read their pamphlets which are still around. Read L'ami du peuple. Read Marat's insane screeds.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507543)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 3rd, 2025 10:20 PM
Author: young Boasthard

ty friend

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48516499)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 3rd, 2025 10:27 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

It all started off really good but extreme paranoia took hold.

One of the major issues was that there were a lot of conspiracy theories about and lots of shitposters stirring up drama. And then some of the conspiracies turned out to be true. It's just like today. Who can tell fact from fiction?

Like 50% of people believed that Marie Antoinette was a spy who was having an incestuous affair with her brother, the Austrian emperor, and that he was plotting to invade France and reinstall the monarchy.

This wasn't true. Leopold thought his sister was nuts and didn't want war. But Louis and M.A. got caught when their letters were intercepted and they were like yeah fuck the Revolution we're going to take our country back. They really were traitors, but not in the way a lot of people thought.

And Robespierre was a virgin fag who thought he was a Perfect Being with no flaws and then anyone who had ever tried to work with the king got guillotined. And every time an Enemy of the State got killed it just amplified the paranoia and they ran out of people to suspect so they just started suspecting their friends. It was insane. And the backdrop to all this were all these crazy peasants running around murdering aristocrats and putting heads on spikes.

It really was a case of too much paranoia, too many conspiracies, a roaming violent mob calling the shots. Nearly every important figure of the Revolution got beheaded. They ate their own.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48516514)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 3rd, 2025 10:32 PM
Author: young Boasthard

the way it totally devolves in an insane paranoiac spiral is really what appeals to me, not a lot of other events in history give off this same feeling and to be honest it seems aesthetically appealing from someone who doesn't read a lot of history. appreciate it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48516528)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 3rd, 2025 10:49 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

By the Fall of Robespierre only like 50 deputies were even showing up to the Convention and no one had actually seen him in months. Even though they had parliamentary immunity from the zero trial prosecutions they could be arrested at any time. By the end almost none of them were sleeping at home at night. Robespierre still had some vestige of popularity with everyday people. But after he killed off his friends he went kind of psycho.

The last stroke was he showed up at the Convention unannounced and started accusing shadowy elements of plotting against the Revolution. When pressed to name somebody in the Conspiracy he could not. His fate was sealed. And several members had been plotting against him waiting for him to fuck up, too.

There was this guy named Barère who brought down Robespierre but the irony is that he had been one of the main people supporting him before. One of the truly bonkers people who escalated all the insanity. But then he became part of the moderate reaction to get rid of Robespierre and his closest allies. It's funny everyone in this story is both a hero and a villain. Barère was one of the few villains who lived long enough to become a hero.

The only way to understand the Revolution is to start from the beginning in 1789 and go to the end of the first major phase in 1794. You have to walk through it minute by minute. What you realize is that 90% of it was about Louis and the Queen and their relationship with Austria and the exiled nobility living in Germany. That's in the beginning and the middle for most of it. And the inability to maintain order with the roaming band of violent peasants.

The final stage where the wheels come off is sometimes called the 'Grande Terreur' and that was mostly about the cult established by the Montagards. 93-94 is the really unhinged part with the mass killings. But to understand it you have to start in the very beginning and go day by day. If you just stopped reading in 1792 you'd probably think Robespierre was a political genius and that everything was going to turn out okay.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48516564)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 1:51 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday
Subject: The Flight of the Royal Family

L'Ami du Peuple No. 497, June 22, 1791

The farewell to the Fatherland by the Friend of the People if the Parisians reject his final advice.

Citizens, the flight of the royal family was prepared from afar by the traitors of the National Assembly and above all by the Committees of Investigation and of Reports. In order to pass intelligence between the counter-revolutionary commandants of Alsace and Lorraine and the fugitive Capets and the Austrians, it was necessary to crush the patriotic party. These infamous committees have perpetually imposed upon you the authors of the troubles in Haguenau, Colmar and Wissembourg, etc. In order to fool you there is no variety of trickery that Broglio, Reignier, Noailles, Voidel and other scoundrels haven’t committed. So it is the National Assembly that prepared the success of the invasion of its provinces, or rather who opened the frontiers of the Kingdom to its enemies. At the same time, in order to come to terms with the enemies of the revolution – the headquarters of the departments – the Parisian general, by his machinations, did all he could to paralyze the national forces and put them in the hands of the King.

Citizens, friends of the Fatherland, you are reaching the moment of your ruin. I won’t waste time raining down upon you vain reproaches for the misfortune you have brought down on your own heads by your blind confidence and your fatal sense of security. Let us only think about your salvation.

There is only one means left to pull you back from the precipice to which your unworthy chiefs have led you, and that’s to immediately name a military tribune, a supreme dictator, to put down the principal known traitors. You will find yourself lost without any resources if you lend an ear to your present chiefs, who will never cease cajoling you and lulling you to sleep, until the day the enemy arrives before your walls. Let the Tribune be named today. Let your choice fall upon the citizen who has, until this day, shown the most enlightenment, zeal and fidelity. Swear to him an inviolable devotion and obey him religiously in all he commands you in order to shed yourselves of your mortal enemies.

The moment has arrived to make fall the heads of the ministers and their subalterns, of Mottié, of all the scoundrels at headquarters and all the anti-patriotic battalion commanders, of Bailly, of all the counter-revolutionary municipal officers, of all traitors in the National Assembly. Begin by assuring yourselves of their persons, if there’s still time[1]. Seize the moment to destroy the organization of the National Guard that destroyed freedom. In these moments of crisis and alarm, you have been abandoned by all of your officers. What need have you of these cowards who hide themselves in the moment of danger, and who only show themselves in times of calm in order to insult and mistreat patriotic soldiers and to betray the Fatherland? You should immediately send messengers out to the departments asking for reinforcements, call the Bretons to your assistance, take over the arsenal, disarm the alguazils on horseback, the guards at the gates, the hunters at barriers. Be ready to avenge your rights, to defend your freedom, and to destroy your implacable enemies.

A tribune, a military tribune, or you are lost without resources! Up to the present I have done everything in human power to save you. If you neglect this salutary advice, the only one left to me to give you, then I have nothing more to say to you, and I take my leave of you forever. In a few days Louis XVI, taking again the despot’s throne, in an insolent manifesto will treat you as rebels if you don’t head off the yoke. He will advance on your walls at the head of all the fugitives, of all the discontented, and Austrian legions will block your way! One hundred cannon mouths will threaten to bring down your city with fiery cannon balls if you put up the least resistance, while Mottié, at the head of the German hussars, and perhaps the alguazils of the Parisian army, will disarm you. All among you who are fervent patriots will be arrested; the people’s writers will be dragged into the dungeons, and the Friend of the People, whose last breath will be for the Fatherland, and whose faithful voice still calls you to freedom, will have as a burning oven for a tomb. A few more days of indecision and there will be no more time to come out of your lethargy. Death will surprise you in the arms of sleep.

1. I wager you a thousand that Mottié, all the informers of headquarters, and all the anti-patriotic battalion commanders have fled with the king.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507584)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 1:54 PM
Author: Diane Rehm talking dirty (🐿️ )

Have you listened to the Revolutions podcast? Thoughts on Duncan’s handling of TFR if so?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507596)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:06 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Not familiar with that one but it's probably pretty good. Any unbiased historian can easily summarize this thing.

The broad strokes was things were shit, the king sucked. He fled and that began the paranoia. And then the elected leaders of the Convention got increasingly more radical and every former ally became the new enemy. Just read some of Marat who was the main ideologue. He was sort of like Consuela if Consuela was saying we ought to immediately kill everyone who disagreed with him even slightly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507650)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:38 PM
Author: Diane Rehm talking dirty (🐿️ )

It’s the same guy who did The History of Rome. He probably has 100 hours just ok TFR but also did a number of other revolutions. Lots of detail and dry humor. Turns out he is a complete shitlib but hides it pretty well in his work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507792)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: a mitigated 180

The Rest is History is doing a multi part series on the FR now. I’m a fan.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507687)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:33 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

They're pretty good. Lots of obscure details that are pretty entertaining. Also one of the dudes was the only person on British TV to predict Trump would win the election.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507767)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:48 PM
Author: a mitigated 180

I enjoy the erudite Oxfordian joking and banter.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507830)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:02 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

The English are utterly contemptible but I will give it to them, they're good craic.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507883)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:38 PM
Author: Diane Rehm talking dirty (🐿️ )

Will check it out thx

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507793)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:24 PM
Author: ....,,....,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.......,.,.,.,.,..,.


What were King Louis XVI’s biggest fuck-ups (before the Flight to Varennes)? My high level understanding is that he needed to raise revenue to pay for France’s debt, couldn’t get the parlements to go along, was too much of an unpopular beta to use the military to make it happen, etc., so he got cornered into convening the Estates General, where he fucked up even more and let everything get out of control until his head was under the blade.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507733)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:33 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

I mean that's mostly it. He probably shouldn't have fired Jacques Necker. Necker was a brilliant finance minister who was trying to save Louis's ass. Def shouldn't have convened the Estates General.

But there were still so many monarchist bootlickers even after all of that. Varennes was a fatal blow. It was literally treason. Before that they weren't going to kill him. He should have just focused on a peaceful transition of power. He could easily have negotiated a constitutional monarchy pre Varennes. Louis was a small man and not very bright. In contrast Robespierre was a political genius who was playing 3D chess up until the point where he descended into so much paranoia that he lost his marbles. He is still the founder of the modern French Republic in every conceivable sense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507764)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:35 PM
Author: "'''''"'""'''"'"'

Have you researched the part played by Freemasons, or the Jews role in spreading the diamond necklace slander?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507781)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:03 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Not sure. I don't think there's any evidence of this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507890)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: fluid

What happened to Lavoisier’s head?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507836)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: regular guy

Who cares?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507841)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 2:57 PM
Author: Guy sperging on a Friday

Wordcels gonna wordcel

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507867)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 1st, 2025 3:10 PM
Author: regular guy

🚨you’re a nigger🚨

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5657613&forum_id=2#48507920)