Like having the Terminator as your personal bodyguard. Why lift weights?

The feminization process, which is impacting the entire west, was far accelerated. Women at large, and over time, will choose all the thing Canadians are choosing:

- invasion by foreign males

- forgiveness of criminality

- meekness in the face of aggression etc

You cannot, ever, have a society with politically empowered women, or it will kill itself. There's no way around this, ugly as it is. We either subjugate women or we die.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48692666)

It's pretty crazy that the US has the phenomenon of Southerners, who are basically the only Western people who have really resisted the disaster that progressivism offers (or Woke, or Communism, or whatever the Left is pushing at any given time).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48692673)

libs have hysterical retards pushing the overton window and the right needs ours too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693131)

It was so thoroughly and disgustingly niggy and jewy that it would be almost anti-civilizational if not for the myopic and sloth like souls that comprise such a poor excuse of a “society” being capable of nothing greater than behaving like a bunch of retarded useless slaves.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48692690)

Yes, that's what I'm suggesting, and it's interesting because of how unlikely the whole situation seems. It has a "hobbits save Middle Earth" feel to it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693500)

this "small" contingent of Americans is keeping the entire fucking West from falling into a dystopian leftist hellhole.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693211)

There can only ever be one preferred destination for high-human capital immigrants, and one preferred destination for low-human capital immigrants. The USA is both of those destinations. We suck up the world's talent and funnel it into tech, and we suck up the most ambitious slaves and slot them into the slave side of our economy

Other countries like Canada try to do this, but they can't. What ends up happening is that instead of getting high human capital turdskins, they get the shitty ones, because all the good ones come to the US. They don't have the economic infrastructure to integrate slaves effectively, so they can't use those either. They end up with millions of literally worthless dependents who do absolutely nothing but leech public services and destroy society. You can say a lot of bad things about immigrants to America, but it's the truth that they do provide useful labor inputs to the economic machine

Same thing is happening in Europe right now. The "leaders" of these countries are too dumb to understand that only the US can utilize this model for immigration. There appears to be some recognition now that they have fundamentally erred by doing this, but it's already too late to fix the damage by doing anything short of mass deportations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693201)

Everything you say is spot on. Like it or not, immigration is also built into America's DNA, which makes it much easier for the next wave of immigrants to assimilate into the US society, seeing themselves as part of a continuing American story meaning people whose families arrived in the 1890s or 1920s can still be proud of what happened in 1776. But in Europe, very different story. Hand-wringing in the UK over a recent poll showing only 40% of young Brits were proud of their country, a collapse from 80+% 25 years ago. The more astute pointed out that mass migration means high proportion of non native Britons constitute the young generation these days and it's hard to be proud of a country that is clearly not your heritage, no matter what bullshit BBC tries to make up. For these people, you'd be indifferent.

Places like Canada and Australia could be closer to the US model and in a way they are but self defeatist progressive leaderships makes it much harder.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693290)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693579)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693712)

This is bullshit a turd is a turd

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693390)

with canada it was a diff issue, they got shitty punjabis cause of their retarded student visa system but thats actually not nearly as bad as taking in niggas and muzzies. its just they got so many furking punjabis in such a short span it was just too much but any group wld have been too much

in the long run taking in even shitty punjabis will work out better than the muzzie and nigga trash in germany etc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693406)

Despite your tired, lazy, self-serving cope "USA bad" shtick, America continues to be leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because it has by far the most cunning, ruthless, sophisticated people and systems on the planet. For better or for worse

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693423)

explain, esp wrt 1962 immigration act

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693436)

The immigration system that we currently have is the result of decades of different groups and actors jockeying for their own self-interest. This is why it "works" (to be clear: I don't personally agree with it, or the outcome of it. But it works very well for those in power, who make the policies)

In contrast, the immigration system that Canada or Europe has is...an attempt at directly copying our system, which doesn't work for them at all. It's like a fat menopausal woman trying to follow a pro athlete's physical training regimen. It's not going to help her: she's just going to injure herself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693446)

UK dicksuckers destroyed the pioneer spirit within it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693717)

but after pearson broke with the US on vietnam, trudeau took office in '68, and became a western media celebrity. he positioned canada as an alternative model to american war policy and race-riots. as someone from montreal, he had fewer ties to the anglo set, and found it more useful to define himself as an alternative to the US rather than in terms of canada's own past.

part of the reaction of other canadian elites to trudeau's rise and quebec nationalism in general was to develop toronto into a financial hub over montreal, the previous center of that kind of activity. this also entailed a greater globalization of the canadian economy.

mass-immigration was sloppily pursued in various ways during the 80's and 90's (chinese and then sikhs), but more fitfully and in overall smaller numbers than the flood which came during the 00's and especially the Trudeau II-era 10's.

once canada stopped being an explicitly anglo-french project, it became an american pseudo-colony, and largely lost any defense against outright racial replacement. even though resistance to this replacement was shut down using the tools of traditional canadian anglo sensibilities, particularly shaming language and appeals to 'order and good government' to get quarrelsome people to shut up and go along with the project.

it's all very sad & perverse. any honest study of contemporary canadian politics and society should leave one extremely cynical.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48693751)

And this is what you get.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5685568&forum_id=2#48694991)