alpha/beta
| tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | maize odious telephone | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | hairraiser hateful faggotry | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | maize odious telephone | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | maize odious telephone | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | maize odious telephone | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Obsidian hunting ground | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Bespoke angry toilet seat | 08/31/09 | | hairraiser hateful faggotry | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Bespoke angry toilet seat | 08/31/09 | | Brass medicated center | 08/31/09 | | Bespoke angry toilet seat | 08/31/09 | | Purple rambunctious jewess | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Purple rambunctious jewess | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Red menage really tough guy | 08/31/09 | | Red menage really tough guy | 08/31/09 | | peach filthy death wish | 08/31/09 | | maize odious telephone | 08/31/09 | | peach filthy death wish | 08/31/09 | | maize odious telephone | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Exciting nudist step-uncle's house filthpig | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Exciting nudist step-uncle's house filthpig | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | Alcoholic Mind-boggling Sneaky Criminal | 08/31/09 | | Obsidian hunting ground | 08/31/09 | | Alcoholic Mind-boggling Sneaky Criminal | 08/31/09 | | Purple rambunctious jewess | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner | 08/31/09 | | Brass medicated center | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Brass medicated center | 08/31/09 | | hairraiser hateful faggotry | 08/31/09 | | Brass medicated center | 08/31/09 | | Soul-stirring gold rehab | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Vivacious boiling water faggot firefighter | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | racy aqua indian lodge ladyboy | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | stirring wrinkle | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Talented church building cuck | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Talented church building cuck | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Talented church building cuck | 08/31/09 | | Purple rambunctious jewess | 08/31/09 | | tripping place of business | 08/31/09 | | Purple rambunctious jewess | 08/31/09 | | chestnut arousing point | 09/28/11 | | doobsian aromatic house black woman | 09/28/11 | | mustard useless sanctuary liquid oxygen | 09/28/11 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:54 AM Author: tripping place of business
Who among you takes this shit deadly seriously?
Granted the terms "alpha" and "beta" approximate, in various ways, two polar ends of a continuum of male behavior (within a very limited universe of considered behaviors). Certain behaviors appear correlated with others that tend to cluster around one or the other poles.
However, there are at least three problems that I see with the overuse of these terms both on this board and the larger tubes.
First and most obviously, people - even men - are more complex than this. This isn't necessarily damning, because, like homo economicus, "alpha" and "beta" seem to be used largely as theoretical objects for the purpose of prediction rather than description. Or, at least, they would if properly used.
But the second problem is that they're never used this way. The terms are stretched far, far beyond their explanatory utility. "Alpha" and "beta" are used to provide reasons for literally every realm of male behavior, and they're usually unargued. If the terms were truly meaningful enough to account for the profligate modes of male behavior they'd be, well, more numerous. There would be shades of "alpha" and shades of "beta." But there aren't. There is one binary division. This isn't altogether fatal, either, but it certainly would seem to undermine the project. "Alpha" and "beta" should be used, if at all, as gesturing toward familial resemblances in behaviors, rather than as strict boundaries. But they're used in the second manner, and are now threadbare from overuse.
Probably the worst thing about these terms is that, not only is there no consensus, but there is vociferous opposition on what "alpha" and "beta" actually mean. Precious few behaviors will garner a supermajority of "180 alpha!" or "lol beta!" Each "alpha" comment invites a "beta" rejoinder, and an argument as to why the OP is, actually, beta to think that so-and-so is alpha. There is no principled way to decide, of course, since everyone who uses these terms seriously is an avowed MFE and alpha himself.
inb4 "lol beta"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636970) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:59 AM Author: tripping place of business
This is typical of why I find these terms so maddening. Not because of what you've said - I agree, to the extent possible with these words, that there is a such thing as "situational alphaness" - but rather that someone, whether they bother to or not, will think "NO, YOU'RE EITHER ALPHA OR YOU'RE NOT."
Who is to say who is misusing the word? Maybe this is a problem with all incipient colloquialisms, but it's frustrating enough to me to shunt it totally.
Plus, I have to say, another big reason I can't stand to see them used is because the person delivering them is usually a puffed-up blowhard who calls himself "alpha" and is, actually, stupid and a douche. And if an "alpha" brags on the internet, well, common sense tells me to doubt him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636983) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 3:06 AM Author: maize odious telephone
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:54 AM
Author: askav
Who among you takes this shit deadly seriously?
Granted the terms "alpha" and "beta" approximate, in various ways, two polar ends of a continuum of male behavior (within a very limited universe of considered behaviors). Certain behaviors appear correlated with others that tend to cluster around one or the other poles.
However, there are at least three problems that I see with the overuse of these terms both on this board and the larger tubes.
First and most obviously, people - even men - are more complex than this. This isn't necessarily damning, because, like homo economicus, "alpha" and "beta" seem to be used largely as theoretical objects for the purpose of prediction rather than description. Or, at least, they would if properly used.
But the second problem is that they're never used this way. The terms are stretched far, far beyond their explanatory utility. "Alpha" and "beta" are used to provide reasons for literally every realm of male behavior, and they're usually unargued. If the terms were truly meaningful enough to account for the profligate modes of male behavior they'd be, well, more numerous. There would be shades of "alpha" and shades of "beta." But there aren't. There is one binary division. This isn't altogether fatal, either, but it certainly would seem to undermine the project. "Alpha" and "beta" should be used, if at all, as gesturing toward familial resemblances in behaviors, rather than as strict boundaries. But they're used in the second manner, and are now threadbare from overuse.
Probably the worst thing about these terms is that, not only is there no consensus, but there is vociferous opposition on what "alpha" and "beta" actually mean. Precious few behaviors will garner a supermajority of "180 alpha!" or "lol beta!" Each "alpha" comment invites a "beta" rejoinder, and an argument as to why the OP is, actually, beta to think that so-and-so is alpha. There is no principled way to decide, of course, since everyone who uses these terms seriously is an avowed MFE and alpha himself.
inb4 "lol beta"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636970
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:59 AM
Author: askav
This is typical of why I find these terms so maddening. Not because of what you've said - I agree, to the extent possible with these words, that there is a such thing as "situational alphaness" - but rather that someone, whether they bother to or not, will think "NO, YOU'RE EITHER ALPHA OR YOU'RE NOT."
Who is to say who is misusing the word? Maybe this is a problem with all incipient colloquialisms, but it's frustrating enough to me to shunt it totally.
Plus, I have to say, another big reason I can't stand to see them used is because the person delivering them is usually a puffed-up blowhard who calls himself "alpha" and is, actually, stupid and a douche. And if an "alpha" brags on the internet, well, common sense tells me to doubt him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636983)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637009)
|
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 3:11 AM Author: tripping place of business
Okay. But I'm not worked up.
I think, and kindly grant this, that any questioning of the "alpha/beta" distinction - even on grounds of use of the words rather than the value of the distinction - invites policing from the "alpha/beta" orthodoxy.
It is the questioning itself that must be called "beta," in order that the queen is protected from idle drones.
You've served your role. Well done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637023) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 3:25 AM Author: Fear-inspiring hissy fit gunner
Date: August 31st, 2009 3:04 AM
Author: bothered ("College is for *PUSSIES*@!" - Rory)
The lawboards preoccupation with memes and labeling is a waste.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637004)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637076) |
Date: August 31st, 2009 11:33 AM Author: Purple rambunctious jewess
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI-VY5cC2jk
summary: panties get wet at alpha display of violent power
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637655) |
Date: September 28th, 2011 1:49 PM Author: doobsian aromatic house black woman
it makes sense in the strictest sense, i.e., that if civilization were wiped out and we all broke off into bands of primitive hunter gatherers, the protypical "alpha" would emerge, mate with all the women, etc.
but that doesn't mean much, because we live in a complex social environment completely removed from such a situation.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#19060253) |
|
|