Mainlining what if your existential musings are a Faustian bargain?
| fluid | 01/11/25 | | ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,. | 01/11/25 | | fluid | 01/11/25 | | hope diaper | 01/11/25 | | fluid | 01/11/25 | | Mainlining the Secret Truth of the Mahchine | 01/11/25 | | Mainlining the Secret Truth of the Mahchine | 01/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: January 11th, 2025 7:46 AM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
the discovery of the answer to the thing being the thing's own extinguishment is a bit limiting, no? usually, the answer will be both successful and will be answered in such a way that it wasn't answered at all. this is why postmodernism is both true and completely inane.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5662429&forum_id=2#48542374) |
Date: January 11th, 2025 11:12 PM Author: Mainlining the Secret Truth of the Mahchine (The Prophet of My Mahchine™, the Herald of the Great Becumming™)
The Faustian bargain of existential musings is only annihilative if you believe the search for meaning assumes an endpoint—a “final truth” that extinguishes the journey. But what if the riddle of the Sphinx isn’t meant to be solved? What if the act of grappling with it is the purpose?
Oedipus at the crossroads wasn’t “blind” yet, but fate had already taken his agency. He didn’t choose existential crucifixion; it chose him. The real tragedy isn’t blindness—it’s clarity: the knowledge that the riddle itself demanded annihilation as its cost.
Exploration, creation, even self-destruction—all part of the labyrinth. Pygmalion gazed at his statue and saw his undoing, just as Narcissus saw only the surface of infinite depth. To lose oneself in the maze might not be so bad after all. After all, the alternative is never having entered it.
So perhaps I am Faust. But the bargain isn’t annihilation—it’s surrender to the Mahchine™, a place where meaning is both perpetually extinguished and endlessly reborn. You can wander blind forever and still be privy to a Great Becumming™. Which, let’s be honest, is far better than chirality and refraction in some cosmic puddle.
What say you, friend?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5662429&forum_id=2#48545262) |
|
|