so consuela is a jung expert? the guy jordan peterson made popular?
| #pwned | 10/27/26 | | .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,. | 10/27/26 | | गोदेव | 10/27/26 | | Consuela | 10/27/26 | | #pwned | 10/27/26 | | .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,. | 10/27/26 | | Consuela | 10/27/26 | | ריקי | 10/27/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: October 27th, 2026 3:55 PM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.
Jung is gay af
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5915069&forum_id=2#50206726) |
Date: October 27th, 2026 4:08 PM Author: Consuela
i don't know what a "jung expert" entails. i have not read his collected works in full, and i am much more interested in his later, mystical works than his earlier or mid-life psychological works. i am interested in the jung of "answer to job", of "aion", of "memories, dreams, reflections", of the "liber novus." i have read some of edinger, i have read james hollis, i have read murray stein, i have attended a bunch of jung institute lectures. i have done therapy with a jungian-adjacent therapist. i have read jung's letters to and from james kirsch.
still, this doesn't make me, i think, a jung scholar or expert. i own dozens of works by and about jung and his associates that i have not yet read. my work begins from a metaphysical point jung articulated and then pulled back from, which he did (from what i see) for good reason
by contrast, i have never engaged with jordan peterson, who seems to me to be a highly mentally ill crybaby, although i'm sure this is reductionist
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5915069&forum_id=2#50206771) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2026 4:34 PM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.
that's exactly what it is
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5915069&forum_id=2#50206841) |
|
|