Tucker's on the opposite end of the spectrum. his mind is far more agile (for better or worse), but tucker displays all sorts of ups and downs and giggling and serious-face.
anderson is a silly man who projects a gravitas that doesn't exist.
yeah i've never been a MSMmo but the times i've come across his interviews i've found him to be sharp and engaging and actually trying to acquire information
Date: November 1st, 2026 10:59 PM Author: sealclubber
he's a faggot going fag on a democrat with a fucking conscience.
but he did what you said even if he didn't believe a word of it! oh how can you do this to us!? oh wahhhhh i'm a serious interviewer. what do you want?! what?! what?!
there happen to be more of them in middle America, but i don't assume everyone in middle America is Like That. you might be projecting your tendency to make all-encompassing judgments about massive groups.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:28 AM Author: Historical American
Hot take no one wants to hear but I thought she came across pretty good here and AC was being very snarky with the gotcha questions. It's OK this lady has a less radical vision of the Democrat party. She seems like a thoughtful moderate by comparison to some of the DSA radicals. I don't mind her at all.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:18 PM Author: Historical American
I'm fairly anti Jewish power myself and have made more threads about Nick Fuentes than any other poaster on XO. I think it's okay to hate on the angry Muslim guy who thinks 9/11 didn't go far enough. If you were White you would know there's only one side here, our own side.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:24 PM Author: Historical American
Studies show they have 50% white DNA and 50% Levantine. That means of they mix with a goy their offspring is 75% white European. That's why there are so many blonde haired blue eyed Jews running around. Ashkenazi are all a little bit white.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:20 PM Author: UN peacekeeper
odd line of questioning, the fact that she is rejecting is not in question, it's like he's interrogating her on behalf of the democrat establishment odd case
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:30 PM Author: law is ea$y (🧐)
the establishment wants democrats to win no matter which faction of the party they are in at the end of the day. his point is cooper is effectively acting as a proxy for the D establishment to completely alienate her from the party
that doesn't change the fact that she's retarded, which is the real reason she lost in the first place, but the agenda for this interview is pretty obvious
nah, a lot of establishment Dems would rather Republicans win than left-flank candidates. see, e.g., Democrat "leadership" refusing to endorse Mamdani. not to mention what they did to Bernie twice.
obviously they can't admit that because none of their base feels that way but it's obvious from their behavior
it seems to be what's going on with Michigan but it hasn't always been the case in the past. i've been watching Dems operate from the left for a while.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:38 PM Author: Historical American
I think we're at the beginning of this internecine conflict, not the end of it. As Dems get more radical, the fight for the soul of the party is only heating up. Schumer is playing both sides but he's a well known Zionist. He would love for Sayed to lose but he doesn't want to be seen as disloyal. He's just playing politics. But everyone from Hakeem Jeffries to Van Jones have made it clear the old guard has no interest in the DSA types.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:41 PM Author: law is ea$y (🧐)
there will be no fight, the progressives have already won, they just use "us vs establishment" rhetoric because it plays well. it's the same shit with trump voters after 2016 (and impressively even to this day when their wing has almost total control over the party) pretending they weren't the new establishment when in reality the shift had already taken place. current head of the party and whatnot isn't as important as who the kingmakers are
don't forget that the Democratic party exists first and foremost to serve to the donors - rich people and corporations. so as popular as progressives are, they'll never replace the establishment.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 1:05 PM Author: law is ea$y (🧐)
they already are the rising establishment, that is the point. in the year of our lord 2026 you still see MAGA types rambling on about "draining the swamp" or whatever when in reality they are clearly the new establishment wing of the republican party. progressives will argue for many years to come they are fighting the "establishment" of the party even after they have long since been the kingmakers.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 1:20 PM Author: Historical American
For decades the progressive wing was pushed around and told to suck it up an come to the middle which they always did. Now they're surging and the establishment is trying desperately to put out the fire. They nuked Graham Planter from orbit. They have way more in store for DSA candidates on the national scene.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:45 PM Author: Historical American
You're crazy if you think DSA radicals have shored up the base. They haven't. They unpopular broadly. In 2028 Ossoff will run as a moderate and a uniter and every Dem will cream their pants over the possibility of defeating the right and everyone will fall into line. You are so wrong here. The alternative is running a Mamdani at the national level and getting blown out in the general. You won't do it. You're not that dumb.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 12:55 PM Author: Historical American
Oh yeah that's a really apt comparison. The Democrat party is TOTALLY built to engender a populist revolution just like the GOP. They don't have any stop-gap measures to prevent a George McGovern tier embarrassing loss in the general. They definitely don't have party grandees with the power to steer voters away from radical or unpopular candidates.
i poasted about this. both parties always have fault lines but given the polarization of the nation it seems to me that we may have actual rifting. i wondered which party would rift first. i think the Dems will.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 1:49 PM Author: Historical American
GOP is going to splinter before Ds will. This is because of the rise of Nationalism and the far right. Every Republican under 40 explicitly or implicitly wants some form of white nationalism. They want the Trump 2016 platform. A return to pre diversity cultural norms, an economic Renaissance for the working class, a system that enriches the many over the few, subservient minorities who stay in their lane. Racism is back bigly. It's all coming to a head in 2028. I don't think Vance or Rubio will be successfully shoved down the voter's throats. It's going to be Civil War on the Right.
Conversely libs have a whole lot of safeguards in place to keep the train on the tracks. They will sense opportunity from GOP fracture and be wise to take advantage of it with a moderate candidate. They won't fracture because they'll sense the opportunity to win. Meanwhile GOP will be in flames. Nature of the game.
Date: November 2nd, 2026 1:57 PM Author: Historical American
The post Trump vacuum kills the dream for administration loyalists. The base has shifted considerably to the right. The age splits are insane too with older voters favoring Rubio neocons and younger voters not being in lockstep with either Rubio or Vance. It's going to get weird.