The thread started by carnelian disturbing location messiness with the subject "u can 'disappear' in a small town in iowa or nebraska & never look back" draws attention to the idea of vanishing or starting over in rural America, specifically small towns in Iowa or Nebraska. However, the ensuing discussion reveals skepticism about the feasibility of such an idea.

Analysis of the Original Post:

OP: carnelian disturbing location messiness

The original post suggests that a person could effectively "disappear" or start anew in a small town in Iowa or Nebraska. The use of quotation marks around "disappear" might imply a more figurative or subjective sense of disappearing, such as escaping from a current life or identity, rather than literally becoming untraceable.

Responses and Analysis:

Orange filthpig point:

Response: "That’s not true"

Interpretation: Orange filthpig point immediately contradicts the OP’s claim, suggesting that the idea of vanishing in a small town is not as simple or effective as it might seem. This response implies an understanding that small towns are often tight-knit communities where strangers are easily noticed and remembered.

Magenta weed whacker property:

Response: "This is the exact opposite of what you can do. Strangers stand out in a small town and do for decades. You can disappear into MFH, San Francisco, Las Vegas, etc. Las Vegas is actually probably your best bet because it's a bunch of degenerate transitory people anyway, you won't stand out."

Interpretation: This poaster elaborates on the initial contradiction to the OP by explaining why small towns are not conducive to disappearing. They highlight that strangers are highly noticeable in small communities and that one's presence can be remembered for years. The post suggests that larger, more transient cities like San Francisco or Las Vegas are more suitable for someone looking to vanish due to their diverse populations and constant movement of people, making it easier to blend in.

Young and fresh Bboooooooooom:

Response: "Lol true"

Interpretation: Young and fresh Bboooooooooom agrees with the assessment made by Magenta weed whacker property and finds humor in the idea that disappearing is more feasible in a city filled with transient people rather than a small town.

Young and fresh Bboooooooooom (Follow-Up):

Response: "There's community and good people in Vegas off the strip"

Interpretation: This additional comment by Young and fresh Bboooooooooom suggests a more nuanced view of Las Vegas, recognizing that while it is often perceived as a place of vice and anonymity (especially on the Strip), there are genuine communities and residents who live outside of the tourist areas, which contrasts with the stereotype presented in the previous comments.

The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT:

Response: "gas all those fags, fuck em to death"

Interpretation: This comment is highly inflammatory, offensive, and appears to be intended to shock or provoke other poasters. It doesn't directly engage with the original topic and instead introduces an aggressive and derogatory statement unrelated to the main discussion.

bronze office boistinker:

Response: "sears todo para ti, indeed"

Interpretation: The phrase "sears todo para ti" (Sears, everything for you) appears to be a cryptic or humorous non sequitur. It could suggest that in a small town where Sears (a now mostly defunct retail chain) might still exist, one would not truly be able to disappear or change their identity—referencing the idea that life in such places is less dynamic or diverse.

labs:

Response: "(edward norton's dad in 25th hour)"

Interpretation: This comment references a character from the film 25th Hour, which revolves around themes of regret, life choices, and the desire to escape one's circumstances. This reference could be an attempt to draw a parallel between the OP's suggestion and the broader theme of seeking escape from one's current life, questioning whether disappearing in a small town truly offers that opportunity.

Broader Themes and Implications:

Feasibility of Disappearing in Small Towns vs. Big Cities:

The majority of responses challenge the idea that small towns in Iowa or Nebraska are suitable places to disappear. The consensus is that small towns have too few people for newcomers to go unnoticed. Instead, larger cities known for their anonymity and transient populations are suggested as better options.

Humor and Cynicism:

Several poasters employ humor, cynicism, and irony to engage with the topic. For example, Young and fresh Bboooooooooom uses humor to affirm the idea that Las Vegas, with its transient nature, is more appropriate for someone looking to disappear, while bronze office boistinker provides a cryptic, almost absurdist take with the reference to Sears.

Aggressive and Inflammatory Tone:

The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT's comment is notably aggressive and offensive, reflecting the kind of provocative behavior sometimes seen on AutoAdmit, where poasters use inflammatory language to derail discussions or provoke reactions.

Pop Culture Reference:

The reference to 25th Hour adds a layer of cultural commentary to the discussion, linking the idea of disappearing with broader existential themes about escape and starting over.

Conclusion:

The thread reveals a skeptical stance toward the idea that one can effectively disappear in a small, rural town. Instead, poasters favor the concept that larger, more anonymous urban environments are better suited for those seeking to vanish or reinvent themselves. The discussion is marked by a mix of humor, cynicism, pop culture references, and a bit of the characteristic aggression and provocativeness typical of AutoAdmit discourse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5580945&forum_id=2#48067559)