\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Relationship between PPP and Partner saleries?

Are they one in the same?
insecure abusive point
  07/01/09
I'm going to assume you meant to say "one and the same&...
Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water
  07/01/09
In Barack Obama's America, in is the new and.
insecure abusive point
  07/01/09
His phrasing is fine for all intensive purposes.
slap-happy trailer park milk
  07/01/09
180
Walnut internet-worthy office double fault
  07/01/09
No, they are not. At a firm with a PPP of $2 million, you'll...
Mildly autistic brunch
  07/01/09
what is the likelihood of this at firms with lower PPP. tha...
Orange Private Investor
  07/01/09
Is this the case even in firms with 1 level of partner?
insecure abusive point
  07/01/09
Tough to generalize. There are certainly firms with low PPP...
Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water
  07/01/09
What is this buying units you speak of?
insecure abusive point
  07/01/09
Every partner owns a certain number of units or shares of th...
Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water
  07/01/09
ITT: Naive, biglaw-gunning law students becum sadly disappoi...
Up-to-no-good Institution
  07/01/09
Excelent working in of the word cum. Yoolur post makes me f...
insecure abusive point
  07/01/09
Depends on the firm, and you can't really break it down by r...
Lascivious carmine codepig orchestra pit
  07/01/09
lockstep doesnt mean you cant have a big spread between juni...
Mischievous Blathering Hall Party Of The First Part
  07/01/09
Lockstep is still usually broken down into 4 levels. At a fi...
cream fighting internal respiration
  07/01/09
I think a lot of the high PPP lockstep firms have around a 4...
adventurous coral half-breed azn
  07/01/09
You're low. Unless you mean those to be take-home numbers (...
Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water
  07/01/09
can you present a model of what you think to be a typical pa...
Orange Private Investor
  07/02/09


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 1:38 PM
Author: insecure abusive point

Are they one in the same?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12132774)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 1:42 PM
Author: Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water

I'm going to assume you meant to say "one and the same"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12132806)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 1:43 PM
Author: insecure abusive point

In Barack Obama's America, in is the new and.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12132817)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 3:31 PM
Author: slap-happy trailer park milk

His phrasing is fine for all intensive purposes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12133582)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 10:21 PM
Author: Walnut internet-worthy office double fault

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12137395)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 1:44 PM
Author: Mildly autistic brunch

No, they are not. At a firm with a PPP of $2 million, you'll find that some partners are making as much as $4.5 million while others may be making as low as $650k (new partner). It depends.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12132823)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 1:49 PM
Author: Orange Private Investor

what is the likelihood of this at firms with lower PPP. that is, and this is just an assumption, firms at the high end of PPP probably have similar partnership models and so there is great disparity in the high and low ends of actual equity partners' compensation. does this also hold true for firms with PPP of $1mill?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12132861)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 1:52 PM
Author: insecure abusive point

Is this the case even in firms with 1 level of partner?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12132887)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 3:07 PM
Author: Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water

Tough to generalize. There are certainly firms with low PPP with very high spreads because of two-tier and/or eat-what-you-kill models. Alternatively, the very highest PPP V10 type firms tend to have lower spreads and are almost, if not entirely, fully lockstep. However, that's not true of some high PPP firms like Kirkland, Dechert or Cadwaladar.

The other issue is that PPP is not an accurate reflection of average take-home in a given year either because partners are required to leave reserves, fund capital calls, buy additional units, etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12133396)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 3:15 PM
Author: insecure abusive point

What is this buying units you speak of?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12133444)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 3:23 PM
Author: Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water

Every partner owns a certain number of units or shares of the partnership, allocated among the partners based upon seniority, production, firm service, etc. Generally when a partner is allocated additional units or shares he or she has to buy the units or shares at that year's value.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12133492)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 3:32 PM
Author: Up-to-no-good Institution

ITT: Naive, biglaw-gunning law students becum sadly disappointed when they realize partnership doesn't mean you simply receive a check for $70,000 once a month after you becum "partner."

Yes dipshits, not only do you have a less than 10% chance of making the cut, but it will likely be about ten years, you don't make millions right away, and you still work like a dog - the firm comes first.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12133591)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 6:25 PM
Author: insecure abusive point

Excelent working in of the word cum. Yoolur post makes me feel sorry for strivers working in DC or NYc. Much easier partnership prospects in smaller markets.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12135353)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 7:13 PM
Author: Lascivious carmine codepig orchestra pit

Depends on the firm, and you can't really break it down by ranking/prestige. You can see a big spread between partners at firms like Skadden, S&C, and Dechert, while I think Cleary, Debevoise, and Cravath still have lockstep partnership.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12135787)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 7:43 PM
Author: Mischievous Blathering Hall Party Of The First Part

lockstep doesnt mean you cant have a big spread between junior and senior dude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12136062)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 8:00 PM
Author: cream fighting internal respiration

Lockstep is still usually broken down into 4 levels. At a firm with $2M PPP, a first year partner would likely make around $660k, 4-5th year partner around $1.34M, a partner who has been a partner for 9-10+ years would likely be right at the $2M PPP, and then you'd have a few head guys (possibly the named founders) who get around $2.5M.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12136200)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 11:15 PM
Author: adventurous coral half-breed azn

I think a lot of the high PPP lockstep firms have around a 4:1 spread.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12138074)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2009 11:17 PM
Author: Heady crystalline meetinghouse boiling water

You're low. Unless you mean those to be take-home numbers (ignoring forced unit purchases).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12138102)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2009 8:57 AM
Author: Orange Private Investor

can you present a model of what you think to be a typical partnership scenario and what expected payout would be per tier/partnership year. here are your assumptions. firm with PPP of $2 million; leverage of 3 associates to 1 partner; equity partners only. rest of the assumptions are yours (i.e., amount of forced unit purchases, equity tiers, etc.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031429&forum_id=2#12140307)