LawProf Taking Questions
| odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | fuchsia shrine | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | fuchsia shrine | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | fuchsia shrine | 12/01/09 | | Vivacious lay place of business | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | silver station | 12/01/09 | | glassy cerebral parlor | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | house-broken provocative twinkling uncleanness partner | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | house-broken provocative twinkling uncleanness partner | 12/01/09 | | Slate cumskin gaping | 12/01/09 | | house-broken provocative twinkling uncleanness partner | 12/01/09 | | fuchsia shrine | 12/01/09 | | Flesh stimulating marketing idea | 12/01/09 | | Gold native | 12/01/09 | | motley theater | 12/01/09 | | Sick Amber Love Of Her Life | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | Sick Amber Love Of Her Life | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | Sick Amber Love Of Her Life | 12/01/09 | | Vigorous pistol genital piercing | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | sepia piazza jap | 12/01/09 | | Black cruise ship fanboi | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | Black cruise ship fanboi | 12/01/09 | | heady principal's office mexican | 12/01/09 | | self-centered contagious bawdyhouse pisswyrm | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | Deep weed whacker | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | aggressive brindle goal in life | 12/01/09 | | odious iridescent sandwich | 12/01/09 | | aggressive brindle goal in life | 12/01/09 | | Glittery stubborn step-uncle's house | 12/01/09 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 1st, 2009 1:40 PM Author: odious iridescent sandwich
One problem, I think, is that people often treat it like you say, as a "defense." People get upset, get personal, get defensive, want to fend off their paper from any critiques, and the like. Yeah, you may not "curl into a ball," but if you come across as an abrasive know-it-all, or if you try to speak to things you don't know about, then it can be problematic.
It's much better to treat it as a collaboration, where the interviewers are trying to tear holes into your work, and where you try to be flexible, taking some criticism and admitting where you might accept some correction or some disagreement, but not be pushed over.
Also, lots of profs really enjoy ripping candidates in any way they can. They'll mock your research agenda ("I don't see how this research fits together."), they'll criticism your positions, they'll try to get a rise out of you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1152368&forum_id=2#13414876) |
 |
Date: December 1st, 2009 8:56 PM Author: odious iridescent sandwich
Engagement in the material, rather than passive reception.
Discussing boundaries of the rules presented.
Reading the cases on your own and attempting to interpret them, rather than having someone else interpret them for you.
Utilizing fact patterns more involved and particularly applied.
I could go on and on. Of course, sure, if you think that someone of reasonable intelligence could go read E&E for a couple years and end up just as good a lawyer as someone who spend a few years at a reasonably ranked law school, I think you'd be in the very tiny minority.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1152368&forum_id=2#13418375) |
 |
Date: December 1st, 2009 8:37 PM Author: odious iridescent sandwich
As a preliminary matter, I don't think Notes are taken very seriously, if at all, in terms of a qualification as a "publication." Publications are more about showing your academic ability and area. Many journals require you to write a Note, whether it's published or not. Maybe it ends up on the top of the heap and it gets published. But showing that you took the initiative to publish on your own can be very important, "TTT journal" or not. I don't know what the standards are for selection for a Note at HYS, but even there, I don't think it's considered too impressive, at least if you're looking to get into academia.
Also, it all depends on your area. Some journals are better than others depending on your discipline. A "TTT" journal may not have as many W&L citations overall, but it may be a very good, say, law and technology journal. You just need to figure out what area you want to practice in and determine which of those "TTT" journals are actually far less TTT than you imagine.
More publications can be good, but don't be too diffused or scattered, and try not to show your age or desperation. Quantity v. quality can be an issue, but it's tough to gauge. Academics talk big about high-quality works, but they seem to be impressed with quantity because they're lazy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1152368&forum_id=2#13418120) |
|
|