Tell me about Simpson Thacher in Palo Alto
| titillating honey-headed indian lodge prole | 09/01/10 | | khaki charismatic sneaky criminal headpube | 09/01/10 | | orchid contagious hospital psychic | 09/01/10 | | razzmatazz box office | 09/01/10 | | walnut talented meetinghouse | 09/01/10 | | Mind-boggling Dilemma | 09/01/10 | | walnut talented meetinghouse | 09/01/10 | | titillating honey-headed indian lodge prole | 09/01/10 | | walnut talented meetinghouse | 09/01/10 | | titillating honey-headed indian lodge prole | 09/01/10 | | walnut talented meetinghouse | 09/01/10 | | sienna startling digit ratio | 09/03/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 3rd, 2010 3:23 PM Author: sienna startling digit ratio
My understanding is that their P.A. office is really an IP lit office and the corporate people aren't generating much work from the valley. To my knowledge, they have no presence whatsoever in VC/emerging companies work. Their corporate group basically tries to vulture a few high profile deals from the actual SV corporate practices at the traditional powers (WSGR, Fenwick, Cooley, Latham) using PE connections. And they're competing directly against Skadden and DPW in that space. I assume this means it might be tough to last for a long time in that office now that PE is not riding high like it was in the aughts when this office started out. Especially if changing the carried interest tax creates a little PE M&A last-gasp boomlet that is over by fall 2012.
Bottom line, if you want to do corporate, go to WSGR. If you want to do IP lit, it's probably as good a place as any, but I really have no idea.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411815&forum_id=2#15957081) |
|
|