The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NYU students humiliate themselves and their school...
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:21 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse No fucking respect for a supreme court justice. What a fucking TTT.
I have to get ready for dinner... will report more later. |
 |
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:22 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Wow, what happened? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543350) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:23 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse It will take longer than the 2 minutes I have to get into it.
Needless to say the homos have no class whatsoever. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:24 PM Author: Galvanic puce property What a shame. I look forward to your full analysis later. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543368) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:22 PM Author: mentally impaired twinkling uncleanness hes just a man. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543352) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:23 PM Author: Saffron twisted jew This is a lyric from "Flash Gordon"... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543361) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:25 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse also Jesus Christ Superstar. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543370) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:02 PM Author: Bright startled theatre kitty cat He's for every one of us! He's a miracle! Savior of the Universe! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544890) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:23 PM Author: contagious ratface Shut the hell up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543356) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:23 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse you weren't there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543364) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:28 PM Author: contagious ratface Scalia is a backward racist and bigot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543404) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:30 PM Author: Saffron twisted jew Yes. If he opposes discrimination he must be a bigot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543412) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:30 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse i dont believe so. and you werent there to hear what he had to say. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543413) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:33 PM Author: contagious ratface You could have told your dramatic fag tale by now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543433) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:55 PM Author: Domesticated Histrionic Headpube dinner? at 3:20? Make sure you wear your white shoes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544853) |
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:23 PM Author: Saffron twisted jew I thought this was going to be about me... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543365) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:28 PM Author: Excitant striped hyena water buffalo You better not have screwed things up for Stern you stupid bastard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543402) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:38 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse Okay so briefly:
One gay students asks Scalia a bullshit question about Lawrence v. Texas. Then out of no where, he asks Scalia if he sodomizes his wife. Scalia doesnt answer and the student badgers and yells at him, pestering him and practically needs to be restrained by our dean and the moderator.
The next gay students asks Scalia to sign a petition signing on to the "homosexual agenda" - this comment was not so much offensive as stupid seeing as judges specifically cant do that.
There were other reasonable questions about Lawrence, and he explained Romer as well, but a couple of students really embarrassed themselves, their cause, and our school. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:40 PM Author: Excitant striped hyena water buffalo the law school disgraces NYUs good name (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543488) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:43 PM Author: Galvanic puce property That's an oxymoron. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543517) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:47 PM Author: Excitant striped hyena water buffalo fine I meant Sterns good name (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543553) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:41 PM Author: lilac vivacious digit ratio Terrible. Hopefully they get disciplined or something. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543497) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:42 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse the second student asked a stupid question to make a point, but I wouldnt bust them for that.
neither student has any class. I hope the first gets blackballed for that shit. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:44 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Out the first one. He deserves it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543521) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:45 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse you outted yourself as a CLS student if you dont know who it is... HAHAHA! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543534) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:47 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Eh? How would I know who it was, since I wasn't there? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543549) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse if you came to our school, you would have watched it on the big screen in the overflow room like the other 200 students. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543556) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:50 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Or I slept in and listened to Limbaugh, instead? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543568) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:52 PM Author: Jet abusive quadroon Limbaugh was going nuts today. Did Chris Shays fuck his dog and kill his wife? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543582) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:53 PM Author: Galvanic puce property I missed the first half. What happened. Why was he irate? He said something really bad happened. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543593) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:58 PM Author: Jet abusive quadroon He was almost crying about all the 'RINOS' out there, talking about how Chris Shays should lose his job for criticizing Tom DeLay, and how Rick Santorum was an opportunist for not actively defending DeLay, and about how the state of New York is trying to get more taxes from him.
Basically, he wants us to have a Canadian system where legislators almost always vote straight party-line.
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:53 PM Author: Canary black woman C'mon, you would sell your soul for a chance to sniff scalia's jock, (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543594) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:57 PM Author: Galvanic puce property He speaks at FedSoc shit. No big deal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543606) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:57 PM Author: navy selfie PWN3D! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543912) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:47 PM Author: hideous clown I agree. I didn't see who asked that first question, but they definitely deserve full approbation (certainly from peers, and possibly from the administration). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543551) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:42 PM Author: contagious ratface Disciplined for what, you Castro Street queer? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543510) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:03 PM Author: Balding ape school For what, dumbass? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543651) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:42 PM Author: Concupiscible harsh business firm boistinker Horrible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543505) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:42 PM Author: Tan Passionate Police Squad Piazza that's what you get for going to a TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543508) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:44 PM Author: mentally impaired twinkling uncleanness assplay? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543519) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:46 PM Author: Salmon Aphrodisiac Shrine what's so wrong with that? god forbid gays speak up about their rights and call out scalia for the twit that he is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543537) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: Jet abusive quadroon God forbid people look at you cockeyed when you shit in the park and eat it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543559) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: rough-skinned tanning salon Asking if Scalia sodomizes his wife =/= "standing up about their rights." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543562) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:04 PM Author: Talented Kitchen dumb bitch. what "rights" were they speaking about? the right to sodomize? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543654) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2005 4:05 PM Author: Marvelous legend cruise ship yes, precisely. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2558147) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:22 AM Author: Cordovan sinister native tank "what's so wrong with that?"
Apparently the person was uncomposed and generally ridiculous. That's usually seen as undecorous. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:46 PM Author: hideous clown it was really embarrassing. I didn't mind so much the petition question, but the 'do you sodomize your wife' question was beyond the pale. there are ways of asking a question that personalizes an issue for somebody without publicly humiliating them and yourself in the process (like, "how would you feel if the government specifically tried to regulate what goes on in your house/bedroom?").
poor form. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: mentally impaired twinkling uncleanness you never know...scalia talked openly about orgies, maybe he feels strongly about hetero-buttlove. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543561) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: Galvanic puce property What is disgrace. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543564) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: mustard patrolman Were there CSPAN cameras there? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543560) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:50 PM Author: geriatric stock car famous landscape painting I doubt it. Scalia hates the press, and probably didn't allow them to record the event. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543569) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:51 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Is the closed caption feed recorded at all? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543574) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:23 AM Author: Cordovan sinister native tank Secretely. Somewhere. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2548512) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:51 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse maybe. I hope so, show the world what a fucking classless TTT we attend.
The best part is our dean gave out special invites to liberal students who wanted to protest, exempting them from our lottery. If this guy is one of them, thats a major shit on ricky's face. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:53 PM Author: lilac vivacious digit ratio "our dean gave out special invites to liberal students who wanted to protest, exempting them from our lottery"
What? That's bullshit. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:54 PM Author: geriatric stock car famous landscape painting Sounds pretty outrageous, but I'd liekto hear an official transcript of what was said before passing judgement. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543599) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:50 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge i don't remember the exact words, but i can give a little context to the guy's comments. he was asking why scalia didn't think the privacy interest was stronger than the state's right to regulate morality. scalia said that all regulation of sexual activities infringed on privacy, but that the state has traditionally been allowed to regulate them. i think the guy took that to mean that sex isn't a privacy issue, so he asked scalia something about his own sex life to demonstrate that sex is a privacy issue. i think the guy understood scalia wrongly, and even if he didn't, it was out of line. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543883) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:50 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort That's ridiculous. Way to advance your cause, jackass. You really showed him.
Equally effective would have been to come to XOXO and post "SCALIA IS A DOUCHE LOLOLOL" |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:18 PM Author: Naked angry really tough guy exactly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543730) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:28 PM Author: Floppy site wow. that sucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544765) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:19 AM Author: Cordovan sinister native tank "Scalia doesnt answer and the student badgers and yells at him, pestering him and practically needs to be restrained by our dean and the moderator."
God, I can't stand people like that. What the hell do they think they're doing? |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:25 AM Author: Poppy Razzle-dazzle Windowlicker what weirdos (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2548515) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:49 PM Author: geriatric stock car famous landscape painting Methinks NYU grads won't be getting many SCOTUS clerkships in the near future. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543563) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:52 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Watch Barkow leave NYU, too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543584) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:51 PM Author: Jet abusive quadroon Eh. Scalia went to NYU voluntarily, he knew what he was getting into.
If someone asked me if I fucked my wife in the ass, I would have shot back 'Mostly just your mom' and went on to the next question. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:52 PM Author: Tan Passionate Police Squad Piazza he has nine kids. obviously didn't spend much time on sodomy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543585) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:54 PM Author: Jet abusive quadroon You're just maintaining the stigma against assbabies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543598) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:02 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort Poor assbabies. :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543639) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:57 PM Author: geriatric stock car famous landscape painting "obviously didn't spend much time on sodomy."
Wrong- At least two of his kids are lawyers. How do you think they were concieved? |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:00 PM Author: Concupiscible harsh business firm boistinker A (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543632) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:39 PM Author: dull point Would have been better if you'd used his son the priest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543819) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:55 PM Author: House-broken curious chapel prole I hope you do this in the confirmation hearings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543603) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:52 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse off to the reception and dinner - more later. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543588) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:54 PM Author: cream preventive strike principal's office That's the difference between the left and the right. People on the left who want to take obnoxious and idiotic potshots at people have to do it by heckling them at college speeches. Right-wingers who want to engage in that behavior get their own talk shows. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543597) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:01 PM Author: green thriller crotch mother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543637) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:08 PM Author: crimson racy station pocket flask so, this guy should get a show about assplay?
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:54 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort This is seriously a strike against NYU in my decision process. The fact that this guy felt like this was something that was permissable in his school's academic climate says something. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543600) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:57 PM Author: House-broken curious chapel prole I hear you. Fuck that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543608) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 3:59 PM Author: Motley ruddy azn Agreed. This was the impression I had gotten from NYU students I know, which is largely why I would have picked Michigan over NYU anyway.
Fuck em. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:43 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge you are going to find this kind of climate at nearly all the top schools, with the exception of chicago and uva perhaps (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543839) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:57 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort if this were true, then Scalia wouldn't have visited in the first place (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543897) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:57 PM Author: Abnormal Deer Antler Sex Offender Nope. I was at Scalia's speech at Umich, and there was nothing like the NYU stuff. People were very respectful during Scaliapalooza, and he said he'd come back soon. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543905) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:42 PM Author: purple provocative menage wagecucks Subject: Scalia on Asians at UMich I'm curious. While at the Mich preview weekend someone who attended Scalia's visit to UMich said that Scalia continually referred to Asians as "Chinks" throughout his speech. According to the student, the audience was nervously apprehensive about his continual use of the term "Chink" but no one in the audience ever said anything about it.
True? Semi-true? Based on some small nugget of truth? An outright lie?
p.s. I also heard that a frisky Mich student asked, in a semi-delicate way, whether or not Clarence Thomas is merely Scalia's lackey. Again, true? or an exaggeration of the truth? |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 12:39 PM Author: Titillating Spruce Jap The student made a comment like "Clarence Thomas, the Robin to your Batman," and Scalia cut him off immediately and said that was disrespectful and that he didn't care what the question was, he wasn't going to answer it after that. Then the kid kind of sheepishly apologized. It was really embarrassing. But not semi-delicate at ALL.
I went to four different Scalia events while he was here, and I did not hear him use "chink" once. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:57 PM Author: Frum New Version People at Penn wouldn't have pulled this shit (and didn't when Scalia was here a year or two ago). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543909) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:43 PM Author: 180 bearded sanctuary When Scalia was at Penn a year or two ago, there was that motley group of protesters outside, and someone asked scalia how he felt about the fact that students were "protesting his policies."
Scalia: "They're not my policies. They're the law."
Agreed, not nearly the same. But you could feel the sentiment... |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:57 PM Author: pungent regret You should write a letter to the Dean and tell him that event affected your decision.
This is screwed up. I hope this guy gets reprimanded or something. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:17 PM Author: crusty psychic theater you should come to FSU. then you can hear speakers cry about terri fucking schiavo and talk about opportunities in the office of faith based bullshit in the white house. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544722) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:25 PM Author: dull point Jeez, and people here criticize ND. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544749) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:29 PM Author: crusty psychic theater we have Jeb's former something here and Katherine Harris's former chief of staff teaching. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545084) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:28 PM Author: dull point Wow. Some of our Catholic faculty held a panel on the Schiavo thing; I didn't go, but I heard the bible beaters were pissed b/c the faculty sided with the Constitution/courts over Jebus. We're not bad at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546841) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 12:56 PM Author: drunken rusted box office this is a pretty stupid comment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2549556) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:12 PM Author: Turquoise base What kind of crass psychopaths are they breeding over at NYU? I hope that first guy get pilloried. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2543691) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 4:45 PM Author: violent mauve incel That is pretty screwed up. Fair or unfair, I'm sure such behavior didn't reflect kindly on NYU in his mind.
Nothing remotely that bad happened when he came to Michigan; there were protesters but he gets that everywhere he speaks. He even sent us this message:
Supreme Court of the United States Chambers of Justice Antonin Scalia
December 20, 2004
Student Senate The University of Michigan Law School 625 South State Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Ladies and Gentlemen:
It was thoughtful of you to convey an official thank-you on behalf of your student body. I frankly have not encountered such courtesy in my now many years of visiting law schools. Many thanks.
I thoroughly enjoyed my few days among you---and you can be sure that I will be well disposed to accept a future invitation from the University of Michigan Law School. Best wishes to all of you for the New Year.
Sincerely,
/signed/
Antonin Scalia
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:07 PM Author: Heady Soggy Corner Blood Rage Awesome.
Can I have another smoking monkey? |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:12 PM Author: violent mauve incel Sorry, I'm out. I can give you my card though; it turns into a sponge in water. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544702) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:27 PM Author: Balding ape school What idiots. They made complete fools of themselves asking irrelevant, inane questions. It would be cool as shit to be able to ask good questions of Scalia, and they wasted the chance.
And what's to protest? Scalia's jurisprudence is rejected by the majority in cases like Lawrence and Romer. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:37 PM Author: wine glittery state the asshole was wearing a U of Chicago windbreaker...i think he's a plant...no one seems to know who this tool is...
all the other questions were fine... |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:39 PM Author: Motley ruddy azn Too late for damage control (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544190) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:40 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge i've seen him around, don't know his name. he'e either a 2L or 3L (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544196) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:41 PM Author: Crystalline stag film associate I know who he is, not that I will say. He went to U of C ugrad. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544208) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:12 PM Author: massive exhilarant forum milk Haha. So the UC windbreaker is true? Hilarious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544446) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:15 PM Author: Fragrant Hall The question asking him to sign onto the homosexual agenda was preposterous as well, but pales in comparison to the preceding question. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544453) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:47 PM Author: Fragrant Hall Disgraceful, but I would expect no better from some of the people here.
Edit: Unless this school develops a better administration, they will not see a cent from me after graduation. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:52 PM Author: Crystalline stag film associate No kidding about not donating. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544305) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:54 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge same here (although i don't really blame this guy's comments on the administration) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544322) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 5:55 PM Author: Fragrant Hall I'm sure Scalia would love to know that the person insulting him after his very fair and compelling speech, was not only an NYU student, but a special guest of the Dean. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544338) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:06 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge how do you know that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544423) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:08 PM Author: Fragrant Hall It's pretty likely considering all these OUTlaw ppl were Revez's guests and the chances of getting in otherwise had to be less than 25%. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544429) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:23 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge how do you know that he invited outlaw people? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544501) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:24 PM Author: spectacular flushed field he did...but I doubt this guy was one of them.... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544515) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:28 PM Author: Fragrant Hall why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544529) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:00 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke Anyone else choosing between CLS and NYU and thinks this weighs heavily in favor of NYU? Seriously, I really hate Republicans. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544376) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:02 PM Author: Fragrant Hall You hate class to.
Come here, you will have a blast. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:04 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke "You hate class to."
Yes, but I love spelling shit right. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:06 PM Author: Fragrant Hall Wow. Very hurtful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544414) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:04 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort And you think this guy has helped out the liberal cause?
You should go to Boalt, or, better yet, PCL, if you think that displays like this are in any way effective. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:06 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke "And you think this guy has helped out the liberal cause?"
Obviously not.
"You should go to Boalt, or, better yet, PCL"
Unfortunately I only got fee waivers from the other two. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:08 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort Haha, are you seriously bragging about your fee waivers? Awesome. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544428) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:09 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke "Haha, are you seriously bragging about your fee waivers?"
No, the point is otherwise I would have applied to PCL. See: joke. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:09 PM Author: Fragrant Hall Very smart to base three years of your legal education on a $70 application fee. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544435) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:12 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke "Very smart to base three years of your legal education on a $70 application fee."
Please see above. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:10 PM Author: Mahogany bespoke faggotry church building everyone who posts on this board has fee waivers from everywhere. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544438) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:15 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke "everyone who posts on this board has fee waivers from everywhere."
God, I fucking know that. I'm not bragging about my fucking fee waivers, okay. I'm proud of the one from Thomas Jefferson School of Law, but the rest are just the icing on the cake. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:15 PM Author: Dashing jewess philosopher-king Agreed. Scalia plays down the importance of privacy on this topic, so some kid hits him with a question that seems out of line precisely because the issue is so private. Scalia's refusal to answer the question is a performative contradiction of his conceptual advocacy. It sounds like the kid was out of line only insofar as Scalia refuses to act in accordance with the theories he advances from the bench.
The kid was wrong in action because Scalia is wrong in theory. I don't fault the kid here. I'm glad that NYU kids can get over the blind worship of prestige and authority. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:18 PM Author: amber brunch yarmulke "Agreed. Scalia plays down the importance of privacy on this topic, so some kid hits him with a question that seems out of line precisely because the issue is so private. Scalia's refusal to answer the question is a performative contradiction of his conceptual advocacy."
Yeah but isn't his conceptual advocacy only that there's not a constitutional right to privacy. He still can refuse to answer any question that he pleases during a speaking engagement. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:26 PM Author: Dashing jewess philosopher-king He can refuse to answer it for any reason he wants. However, if he passes judgment on the question for being out of line he would be assenting to our cultural norm that sexual conduct is highly private and therefore protected. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544519) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:28 PM Author: Azure Theater Stage Shitlib Really, I didn't realize that everything that was considered private was protected by the constitution? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545064) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 12:48 AM Author: indecent church so the water company is prohibited by the constitution from publishing the corn content of my dumps? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2547585) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:38 PM Author: High-end french chef I think what the poster above was saying was that Scalia's judicial position is simply that there's no *constitutional* right to privacy. Whether the legislature should enact a right to privacy, and what is Scalia's personal position with respect to the desirability of a right to privacy, are separate questions. Scalia might well agree that one's sexual practices are private -- BUT he can at the same time argue that this is not a *constitutional* issue (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545162) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:38 AM Author: Cordovan sinister native tank "he would be assenting to our cultural norm that sexual conduct is highly private and therefore protected."
Or he was avoiding incriminating himself. Or he could be irrational. Or he acted so as to not introduce what would have been implicit tu quoque ad hominems. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:18 PM Author: Fragrant Hall First of all I don't agree with Scalia on the issue.
Second, you're an idiot because there is a clear distinction.
Scalia is saying that society can choose to regulate private sexual conduct and that no right of privacy trumps such ability.
Now what does trying to embarass Scalia by asking an obviously out of line question have anything to do with the above? |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:23 PM Author: Dashing jewess philosopher-king > Now what does trying to embarass Scalia by asking an > obviously out of line question have anything to do with the > above?
It was out of line because it flouted our convention of protecting sexual conduct through privacy. But according to Scalia there is no such compelling right, so between just he and the kid, this shouldn't have been out of line. If Scalia lived his advocacy he would have answered the question.
He's invoking protections that he refuses to grant to others. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:26 PM Author: Fragrant Hall You are obviously on the intellgence level of the moron that asked the question. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544522) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:28 PM Author: Dashing jewess philosopher-king You mean "intelligence." HTH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544535) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:36 PM Author: drab free-loading liquid oxygen haHA! PWN3D and resorts to a spelling error. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545138) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:26 PM Author: High-end french chef dude, you're confusing a right with a convention (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545555) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:40 AM Author: Cordovan sinister native tank "He's invoking protections that he refuses to grant to others."
He wasn't invoking a *constitutional* protection. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:01 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge scalia admitted that sexual activity implicates privacy, but the government has a right to regulate that activity despite its private nature. his refusal to answer wasn't contradictory at all since he was asked the question in a non-government setting. if he had been a witness in a court case, and had been asked this question, i'm certain he would feel it his obligation to answer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544661) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:43 PM Author: Dashing jewess philosopher-king good point. I'm wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544812) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2005 3:34 AM Author: Cordovan sinister native tank "Scalia's refusal to answer the question is a performative contradiction of his conceptual advocacy."
No, that's just one of the possibilities. For instance, it could also be an implicit stance against the notion that his personal experience and conduct are relevant to the matter at hand. And a strong case could be made for this possiblity. After all, hypocricy doesn't generally deny the truth of a proposition.
"The kid was wrong in action because Scalia is wrong in theory."
Yeah, only if you're right in claiming that only on possible motive for his refusal to answer exists. Yours is an argument by exclusion. You assert but don't demonstrate that your possiblity is the last one standing.
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:18 PM Author: spectacular flushed field is one of deez da guy?
ill show him sodomy all right |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:19 PM Author: Fragrant Hall Did you just pick random ppl? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544479) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:20 PM Author: spectacular flushed field no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544485) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:20 PM Author: Crystalline stag film associate no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544491) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 6:28 PM Author: cocky indigo knife indian lodge no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544531) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:57 PM Author: Autistic Codepig Locus What do you mean you'll "show him sodomy?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544857) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:19 PM Author: Fantasy-prone appetizing spot Wait a second. I'm confused. Does Scalia pound his wife in the ass? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544733) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:20 PM Author: crusty psychic theater The question that Scalia should have been asked is:
"Regardless of the merits of your ultimate decision to stop the vote recount in Florida, how can you justify your December 9th, 2000 order to stop the recount without having heard any arguments?" |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:25 PM Author: flatulent ruby legal warrant lack of equal protection due to varying standards to count votes would've rendered irreparable harm on GW if Gore was projected as a false winner under these conditions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544750) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:27 PM Author: crusty psychic theater and it would have been the same if it was Gore v. Bush, and it was Bush threatening to overtake? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544754) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:36 PM Author: trip idea he suggested ceo fucking idiot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545142) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 7:48 PM Author: Abnormal Deer Antler Sex Offender Ha. I love in-your-face homosexuals. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544835) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:04 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse Subject: BACK FROM DINNER... The NYU freaks continued their embarrassment by shouting and blowing noisemakers directly outside of the ceremony where Scalia and the people honoring him were speaking. One of the best speakers was the head of the ACLU, btw.
On the way to dinner, I was told to fuck off by my classmates who shouted "fuck you scalia" and "bigotry go home". There were similar signs everywhere.
Dinner was good and I got a chance to shake Scalia's hand and talk to him for about 45 seconds. He seems like a nice personable guy, and people who know him echo that sentiment.
The big loser here was Dean Revesz who was green with disgust at the behavior of his students, many of whom were personally invited by him to these events. He was visibly humiliated as a 4th Circuit judge honoring Scalia has to pause as he was being shouted down by chants of "FUCK YOU NINO" coming from outdoors.
Clearly a classy day for all NYU liberals promoting free expression and academic freedom. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:05 PM Author: Frum New Version Jesus Christ, who the fuck are these people? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544904) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:07 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse the fags and leftists think they run the school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544919) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:09 PM Author: Frum New Version I can't believe that NYU is the only school that pulls these stunts though. There are leftist crazies everywhere but you don't see the Michigan or Vandy or Penn liberals doing this kind of shit when Scalia or any other speaker visits. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544937) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:31 PM Author: Balding ape school Nor would most liberals at NYU. Don't paint all liberals with the crazy bunch just because of a few fringe activists.
The ones who are shouting obscenities obviously hurt their cause -- I'm sure Scalia was smiling on the inside -- so Earl should simmer down. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:37 PM Author: contagious ratface Exactly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545155) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:54 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse Well there were about 50 people shouting down Scalia, so it wasn't quite a small minority.
I have no problem with protest, but organized disruption of an event to honor someone as distinguished and important (law wise) as Scalia is humiliating. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:19 PM Author: Balding ape school Quit bitching.
50 (your estimate) out of, what?, 1500 (my estimate) NYU Law liberals and gay rights supporters participated in these obscenities. (And I'm not counting non-law school idiots who might've also participated, showcasing their own brand of meretricious disgrace.)
Scalia was probably pleased as punch.
The protests were exhibitionist and juvenile and lacked any sort of pragmatic rhetorical exchange. (After all, they careened even your wagon into a reactionary huff -- a sign of dispensation by both parties of thoughtful dialogue.)
My objection is to your contention that, blanket-wide, "liberals and fags" agree with the tactics employed here.
They don't, any more than Scalia's arguably disrespectful, uber-Catholic dissents (mentioning "flag-pole sitters" in the Lawrence oral argument, for example) render his arguments without merit, even despite his entertainment and vain claims to objectivity.
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:24 PM Author: Laughsome national potus I don't see a lot of conservatives using such tactics. It's a problem on your side of the aisle. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546816) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:42 PM Author: crusty psychic theater http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/maimi.htm
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:51 PM Author: Balding ape school Oops. My bad.
Since your side has a hold on its version of absolute truth, we'll forget the histrionic, hypocritical exhibitionism of right-wing radicals. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:57 PM Author: Talented Kitchen link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2547079) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:07 PM Author: wine glittery state he has to respond to this or else resign.
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:09 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse Sexton would not stand for this outrage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544926) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:09 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort This is a fucking disaster. Unreal.
Those students should be expelled. Mindless behavior. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:55 PM Author: 180 bearded sanctuary No they shouldn't! Ostracized, yes... denied recommendations, maybe... expelled? No. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545797) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:33 PM Author: Fragrant Hall They should be ostracized and expelled. And sodomized. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546158) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:09 PM Author: Domesticated Histrionic Headpube you know a school is a TTT when even the liberals act stupid... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544927) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:11 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse I would say the liberals usually are the ones to act stupid, but today I must agree on the TTT status.
someone forgot to teach these punks to respect their elders and betters. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:11 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Wow, what a disgrace.
Yes, Strossen is a good speaker. She isn't a total whacko, either. She used to be hot, many years ago. Still sort of MILFish.
Who was the 4th Cir. judge? Luttig? |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:16 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse some southerner from VA, I left the program in my mailbox.
thick southern accent. he clerked for scalia on the DC cir. all over his nuts. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:11 PM Author: crusty psychic theater i would probably be more conservative if i went there, sounds foul. Scalia is tarnished by Bush v. Gore but he deserves respect for Hamadi. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544949) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:20 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse Bush v. Gore is the only decision that I find indefensible per Scalias jurisprudence. Of course no one asked about that one.
Hamami was a big case, and so was Crawford v. Washington. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:23 PM Author: crusty psychic theater yeah, i guess crawford was large and in charge in terms of suspected "terrorists" too. uh, yeah, someone fingered you, g, but we can't tell you who. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545029) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:12 PM Author: contagious ratface I don't see how this is any worse than when you nutjob Republicans were trying to save a vegetable last month. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544953) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:19 PM Author: soul-stirring gay resort false dichotomy - both events are equally ridiculous (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2544995) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:20 PM Author: pungent regret Are you even in law school? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545000) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:45 PM Author: Garnet Den Mediation If the people down in Florida went to NYU, you might be right. You would expect rationality--or at least decency--from people who were admitted to supposedly one of the world's elite institutions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545226) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:38 PM Author: lake hissy fit "Dinner was good and I got a chance to shake Scalia's hand and talk to him for about 45 seconds. He seems like a nice personable guy, and people who know him echo that sentiment.
"The big loser here was Dean Revesz who was green with disgust at the behavior of his students, many of whom were personally invited by him to these events. He was visibly humiliated as a 4th Circuit judge honoring Scalia has to pause as he was being shouted down by chants of "FUCK YOU NINO" coming from outdoors.
"Clearly a classy day for all NYU liberals promoting free expression and academic freedom."
If they're going to take the special measures, is it wrong to be actually feeling happy right now it came back to bite them? I'm trying to decide. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:55 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse what do you mean? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545314) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:31 PM Author: dull point Wow. Just, wow.
As long as the most persuasive statement the libs can make is 'Fuck you Nino,' conservatives will stay in power for a long long time. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:11 PM Author: wine glittery state the liberal profs should send out a statement saying they are embarrassed by all this...
its one thing to protest its another to use profanity and offensive questions...
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:25 PM Author: Sable mood step-uncle's house we had nuts at michigan as well. some hippies were chanting shit at me when i was walking out after scalia's speech, and i suggested they should have come inside and learned something. clearly inappropriate, as one of them screamed, threw down his sign, and rushed down the stairs at me.
nutball liberals are across-the-board intolerant. drives me nuts that i agree with so much of their social agenda.
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:29 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse another festering TTT in decline. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545073) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:30 PM Author: crusty psychic theater did they decide on you yet?
i'm still waiting on Georgetown. I wonder if I can get my 70 bucks back. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:32 PM Author: aromatic learning disabled toilet seat affirmative action PWN3D (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545110) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:34 PM Author: Sable mood step-uncle's house our protesters simply stood and left. which i didn't really mind, though i thought it inconsiderate to everyone who didn't get in.
but yes, festering. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:59 PM Author: Black pit Subject: But those weren't law students, they were one of AA's finest hippies/grad students (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545832) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:11 PM Author: Sable mood step-uncle's house made me long for a hummer and diplomatic immunity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545954) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:35 PM Author: electric ungodly fat ankles nursing home youre a fag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545125) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:46 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse BTW, the ACLU woman told us that the people screaming outside and blowing airhorns were acting beyond their first ammendment rights, and are douchebags. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545238) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:50 PM Author: Galvanic puce property Did Naidine use the word "douchebag"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545271) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:55 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse no, but that would have been HoTTT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545318) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 8:57 PM Author: contagious ratface I thought you hated civil liberties, black people, and gays? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545328) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:13 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse no mrjinx I dont. And you need to stop being a fucking asshole. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545452) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:21 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse thanks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545517) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:23 PM Author: navy selfie Did they have any first amendment rights at all, given that NYU is private? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545536) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:50 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse of course not, but NYU is open to freedom of speech, provided that it doesn't infringe on the rights of others to be heard, which was the case today. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545762) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 9:59 PM Author: 180 bearded sanctuary can you name someone who wasn't heard because of the protesters? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545830) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:04 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse sure, I couldn't hear half of what the speakers said today because the shouting was so loud. I could barely hear Barkow and the ACLU lady. Plus Scalia got interrupted with airhorns. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545882) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:05 PM Author: diverse dilemma Did they acknowledge the protests, or just try to ignore them? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545894) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:08 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse they acknowledged them and laughed them off, then ignored them. However the noise was more or less constant, and the softer speakers could not be heard at times. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545927) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:10 PM Author: navy selfie I guess that's a cost you're going to bear if you want to do the free speech thing. If you're serious about having the speakers heard, you just have to silence the protesters. Shut them down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545942) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:04 PM Author: diverse dilemma It sounds like the protesters went too far by disrupting the evening event.
On the other hand, Heaven forbid they actually act agressively and loudly enough to have their protests noticed.
|
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:10 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse the problem is that besides disrupting the events and being offensive, they were also saying that Scalia should not be welcome to speak at NYU. This is almost comic in light of how far the left has gone to protect the voice of "minority" and fringe speakers at NYU.
LIke Lynne Stewart last week. |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:11 PM Author: diverse dilemma True. I can see that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2545959) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:17 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse yeah, the "academic freedom, but only for views I like" is really getting on my nerves. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546008) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:49 PM Author: diverse dilemma Most people who consider themselves in favor of free speech are only in favor of it for views that they agree with. Which means Hitler was in favor of free speech by their definition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546362) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:54 PM Author: Frozen unhinged bawdyhouse well we would like to think of ourselves as more enlightened, no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546410) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 11:02 PM Author: diverse dilemma I certainly hope I'm more enlightened. You have to work at it though.
EDIT: You going to the NYU/CLS game tomorrow night? |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:37 PM Author: Fragrant Hall Bottom line: Revesz must respond STRONGLY for once and stop caving in to OUTLaw's baby cries time after time after time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546220) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:38 PM Author: cracking low-t gunner gaming laptop DUMB FAGGOT WITH THEIR ANNOYING FAGGOT VOICES (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=164493&forum_id=2#2546239) |
|
Date: April 12th, 2005 10:56 PM Author: Garnet Den Mediation Well, they can't say they didn't see it coming:
http://www.nyunews.com/news/campus/9263.html |