The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
libs finding out body cams are bad for criminals, may need to shut | it | down
| swollen big water buffalo | 11/18/17 |
| pungent plum headpube | 11/18/17 |
| Laughsome sadistic associate brunch | 11/18/17 |
| Mustard greedy spot gaping | 11/18/17 |
| swollen big water buffalo | 11/18/17 |
| well-lubricated orange whorehouse toilet seat | 11/18/17 |
| Buff excitant hominid university | 11/18/17 |
| Blue wrinkle travel guidebook | 11/18/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:18 PM Author: swollen big water buffalo sometimes it's hard to tell when libs are lying and when they're insane. did they really think cams would make police officers look worse and nigs look better? who knows but it's certainly problematic now: https://www.teamupturn.org/reports/2017/the-illusion-of-accuracy "Despite common misperceptions, camera footage is not inherently more objective or more reliable than other evidence. It shows one perspective of an incident — a perspective that is not identical to the officer’s perspective. Footage can be limited by the camera’s angle, field of view, and other factors." |
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:20 PM Author: pungent plum headpube It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident |
 |
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:21 PM Author: Laughsome sadistic associate brunch (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718858) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:22 PM Author: Mustard greedy spot gaping lol so not even taping sex with a womyn can protect you from false claim.... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718861) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:23 PM Author: swollen big water buffalo ?
stop privileging the narrative of your camera over zher lived experience u bigot |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:29 PM Author: well-lubricated orange whorehouse toilet seat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718935) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:20 PM Author: Buff excitant hominid university Lol libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718854) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:24 PM Author: Blue wrinkle travel guidebook i mean, it is true that the body cam can only record what the camera takes in, and in that sense there may be material off-camera action, but LJL at the retarded argument that this makes the camera recording plus testimony about off-camera action less objective than just testimony about the entire incident.
"a perspective that is not identical to the officer’s perspective."
are they now suggesting that the officer's subjective beliefs are material? hmmm, libs? |