The New Republic: Ban all political speech on social media before elections
| 180 incel sex offender | 02/24/18 | | Azure legend brethren | 02/24/18 | | lavender laughsome volcanic crater | 02/24/18 | | Transparent Church Pocket Flask | 02/25/18 | | white arrogant jew | 02/25/18 | | 180 incel sex offender | 02/24/18 | | 180 incel sex offender | 02/25/18 | | Odious olive philosopher-king | 02/24/18 | | flushed trip private investor | 02/25/18 | | provocative crackhouse | 02/25/18 | | Hateful bronze corner tank | 02/25/18 | | misanthropic passionate trust fund | 02/25/18 | | Nubile Snowy Tanning Salon Codepig | 02/25/18 | | Hairraiser rough-skinned hospital | 02/25/18 | | Diverse Becky | 02/25/18 | | pontificating cerebral voyeur | 02/25/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 24th, 2018 11:08 AM Author: 180 incel sex offender
"Macron’s idea is promising, but falls short. If fake news truly poses a crisis for democracy, then it calls for a radical response. Instead of merely requiring greater transparency of social media and empowering the courts to ban users and website—the latter being a slow, time-consuming, and ultimately Sisyphean solution—perhaps governments should outright ban Facebook and other platforms ahead of elections.
A model for this already exists. Many countries have election silence laws, which limit or prohibit political campaigning for varying periods of time ranging from election day alone to as early as three days before the election. What if these laws were applied to social media? What if you weren’t allowed to post anything political on Facebook in the two weeks before an election?"
https://newrepublic.com/article/147156/ban-facebook-elections?utm_content=bufferf1691&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3902606&forum_id=2#35476708) |
|
|