By Meghan Cox Gurdon

Updated Dec. 27, 2020 4:01 pm ET

SAVE

SHARE

TEXT

692

Sixth-grade students work on a reading comprehension lesson in Wesley Chapel, Fla., Nov. 20.

PHOTO: DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD/ZUMA PRESS

Listen to this article4 minutes

00:00

1x

A sustained effort is under way to deny children access to literature. Under the slogan #DisruptTexts, critical-theory ideologues, schoolteachers and Twitter agitators are purging and propagandizing against classic texts—everything from Homer to F. Scott Fitzgerald to Dr. Seuss.

Their ethos holds that children shouldn’t have to read stories written in anything other than the present-day vernacular—especially those “in which racism, sexism, ableism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of hate are the norm,” as young-adult novelist Padma Venkatraman writes in School Library Journal. No author is valuable enough to spare, Ms. Venkatraman instructs: “Absolving Shakespeare of responsibility by mentioning that he lived at a time when hate-ridden sentiments prevailed, risks sending a subliminal message that academic excellence outweighs hateful rhetoric.”

The subtle complexities of literature are being reduced to the crude clanking of “intersectional” power struggles. Thus Seattle English teacher Evin Shinn tweeted in 2018 that he’d “rather die” than teach “The Scarlet Letter,” unless Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel is used to “fight against misogyny and slut-shaming.”

Outsiders got a glimpse of the intensity of the #DisruptTexts campaign recently when self-described “antiracist teacher” Lorena Germán complained that many classics were written more than 70 years ago: “Think of US society before then & the values that shaped this nation afterwards. THAT is what is in those books.”

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

Opinion: Morning Editorial Report

All the day's Opinion headlines.

PREVIEW

SUBSCRIBE

Jessica Cluess, an author of young-adult fiction, shot back: “If you think Hawthorne was on the side of the judgmental Puritans . . . then you are an absolute idiot and should not have the title of educator in your twitter bio.”

An online horde descended, accused Ms. Cluess of racism and “violence,” and demanded that Penguin Random House cancel her contract. The publisher hasn’t complied, perhaps because Ms. Cluess tweeted a ritual self-denunciation: “I take full responsibility for my unprovoked anger toward Lorena Germán. . . . I am committed to learning more about Ms. Germán’s important work with #DisruptTexts. . . . I will strive to do better.” That didn’t stop Ms. Cluess’s literary agent, Brooks Sherman, from denouncing her “racist and unacceptable” opinions and terminating their professional relationship.

The demands for censorship appear to be getting results. “Be like Odysseus and embrace the long haul to liberation (and then take the Odyssey out of your curriculum because it’s trash),” tweeted Shea Martin in June. “Hahaha,” replied Heather Levine, an English teacher at Lawrence (Mass.) High School. “Very proud to say we got the Odyssey removed from the curriculum this year!” When I contacted Ms. Levine to confirm this, she replied that she found the inquiry “invasive.” The English Department chairman of Lawrence Public Schools, Richard Gorham, didn’t respond to emails.

“It’s a tragedy that this anti-intellectual movement of canceling the classics is gaining traction among educators and the mainstream publishing industry,” says science-fiction writer Jon Del Arroz, one of the rare industry voices to defend Ms. Cluess. “Erasing the history of great works only limits the ability of children to become literate.”

He’s right. If there is harm in classic literature, it comes from not teaching it. Students excused from reading foundational texts may imagine themselves lucky to get away with YA novels instead—that’s what the #DisruptTexts people want—but compared with their better-educated peers they will suffer a poverty of language and cultural reference. Worse, they won’t even know it.

Mrs. Gurdon writes the Journal’s Children’s Books column.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41629561)

tbf It sounds like these teachers are actually too stupid to teach any of these books

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41629570)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41630526)

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mrshlevine/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41630563)

Did they “ban” it or just remove it off the reading list for one specific class

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41630565)

2. twilight

3. michelle obama biography

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41630581)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._V._Padma

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41630865)

The answer is fight club-style anonymous mass organization, it’s effective enough that the left has focused on social media crackdowns on anonymous leaderless movements like Qanon

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41631535)

"Jessica Cluess, an author of young-adult fiction, shot back: “If you think Hawthorne was on the side of the judgmental Puritans . . . then you are an absolute idiot and should not have the title of educator in your twitter bio.”

An online horde descended, accused Ms. Cluess of racism and “violence,” and demanded that Penguin Random House cancel her contract. The publisher hasn’t complied, perhaps because Ms. Cluess tweeted a ritual self-denunciation: “I take full responsibility for my unprovoked anger toward Lorena Germán. . . . I am committed to learning more about Ms. Germán’s important work with #DisruptTexts. . . . I will strive to do better.” That didn’t stop Ms. Cluess’s literary agent, Brooks Sherman, from denouncing her “racist and unacceptable” opinions and terminating their professional relationship."

Random House fronted some cash for this woman's next novel and it wants what it paid for. By contrast, Ms. Cluess clearly doesn't generate enough revenue for her "literary agent" to be worth any amount of hassle. If her books were printing stacks that agent would have had no problem with her "unacceptable" opinions.

In terms of the school stuff, they are probably private schools that have given one or two people significant and arbitrary power to control what books get assigned, so "power" in this situation is just the ability to persuade one person.

This isn't new. Huck Finn has been "banned" in various places for decades for using the word nigger.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41631465)

https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41636945)

The 25% Revolution—How Big Does a Minority Have to Be to Reshape Society?

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-25-revolution-how-big-does-a-minority-have-to-be-to-reshape-society/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41637206)

@BostonCathSupt

Any public schools that have decided to ban the classics may donate their books to the Catholic schools of the Boston Archdiocese. Let our students benefit from your censorship. Please contact me to arrange the donations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41638121)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9105217/Author-canceled-DROPPED-agent-defending-writer-Scarlet-Letter.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4722375&forum_id=2#41661586)