And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t re...	Topaz infuriating institution halford	05/26/26
yes	supple awkward tanning salon codepig	05/26/26
It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LO...	Topaz infuriating institution halford	05/26/26
this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking ...	supple awkward tanning salon codepig	05/26/26
The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can&...	Topaz infuriating institution halford	05/26/26
...	dashing slate pistol	05/26/26
Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just pr...	Bespoke puce rigor tattoo	05/26/26
People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but to...	Topaz infuriating institution halford	05/26/26
...	Bespoke puce rigor tattoo	05/26/26
...	dashing slate pistol	05/26/26

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:09 AM Author: Topaz infuriating institution halford And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t related are actually just different languages for describing the same thing. See actually what happened was the machine jusf statistically predicted the next token in a way that happened to be correct. It totally has no “understanding” of the math. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901513)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:13 AM Author: supple awkward tanning salon codepig yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901516)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:19 AM Author: Topaz infuriating institution halford It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LOOKS like the machine converged on a genius answer but actually it was just a freak statistical accident. If you multiply probabilities across infinite time monkeys on a typewriter could probably do the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901522)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:22 AM Author: supple awkward tanning salon codepig this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking the tv is a real person or time traveller or some shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901523)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:32 AM Author: Topaz infuriating institution halford The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can’t see the “person” inside the machine that it had to have come from statistical magic. The reality is that if “predicting the next token" results in a counterexample to an 80 year old conjecture that contradicts the intuition of Paul Erdos, then "token prediction" is functionally indistinguishable from "reasoning." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901537)

Date: May 26th, 2026 2:09 AM Author: dashing slate pistol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901569)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:31 AM Author: Bespoke puce rigor tattoo Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just predicts the next word" thing anymore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901535)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:33 AM Author: Topaz infuriating institution halford People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but tons of software engineers and Reddit midwits still do. It isn’t even totally wrong at a certain level of description anyway just reductive in a way that strips away almost everything actually important (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901541)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:35 AM Author: Bespoke puce rigor tattoo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901545)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:16 AM Author: dashing slate pistol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901521)