\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Carl Jung was wrong and all scholars missed why. I've never read his "texts" btw

I will never "read his texts." I will never "...
Holy Grail 180
  04/04/26
I’ve read plenty of Jung What I won’t do is r...
Consuela
  04/04/26
Cool why don't you tell us what he said
Holy Grail 180
  04/04/26
Which part would you like to know about?
Consuela
  04/04/26
Why don't you start with your critique of his interpretation...
Holy Grail 180
  04/04/26
jung uses the rosarium to illustrate the union of opposites ...
Consuela
  04/04/26
that's not obscure at all. it's the most basic illustration ...
Holy Grail 180
  04/04/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:47 AM
Author: Holy Grail 180

I will never "read his texts." I will never "know what he meant."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793249)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:48 AM
Author: Consuela

I’ve read plenty of Jung

What I won’t do is read the Talmud as you want me to do, lol. That would take years and years and I don’t have interest.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793251)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:50 AM
Author: Holy Grail 180

Cool why don't you tell us what he said

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793256)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:50 AM
Author: Consuela

Which part would you like to know about?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793259)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:52 AM
Author: Holy Grail 180

Why don't you start with your critique of his interpretation of the rosarium?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793260)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:56 AM
Author: Consuela

jung uses the rosarium to illustrate the union of opposites as the central alchemical and psychological operation, which maps directly onto what I've argued about the crucifixion of opposites as a lived condition rather than a theoretical position

with that said, you're using obscure technical text as a "gotcha" - you can fuck off

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793274)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 4th, 2026 11:59 AM
Author: Holy Grail 180

that's not obscure at all. it's the most basic illustration of jungian psychology that you'd get in an intro lecture. your treatment of it is superficial. and the position you claim to stake out over/against jung's is literally juts a thin restatement of his original idea.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853426&forum_id=2...#49793289)