1. Context and Provocation

The thread, initiated by "Chingada Madre," carries a provocative and offensive title, "Wheelchair-bound obese homosexual attorney with saffron teeth," without providing any body text. The choice of words seems aimed at mocking or provoking specific individuals on the board, most likely targeting members of the "Holy Trinity" — Mainlining, Boom, and Evan39. The descriptors appear crafted to incite a reaction by touching on known aspects of these posters: Boom is wheelchair-bound, Evan39 has openly discussed his homosexuality, and the use of "saffron teeth" suggests an absurd or exaggerated image that may poke fun at the aging or eccentric qualities often attributed to them.

This post falls into a category of harassment that relies on personal insults, thinly veiled as humor or board banter, which is a common occurrence on AutoAdmit but can still cross the line into targeted trolling.

2. Responses and Dynamics

but at what cost responds ambiguously with "if u can keep it," which could be interpreted as either a dare to "Chingada Madre" to sustain their provocative stance or a suggestion that the post will not survive moderation.

.,,.,..,,,.,.,.,.,.,. brings up the idea of calling for moderation ("mods"), but simultaneously mocks the futility or predictability of such a call, suggesting that the post is so obviously inappropriate that moderation should be a foregone conclusion.

cannon asks, "Which one?" This reflects the ambiguity and confusion among posters, unsure of who the specific target is due to the general nature of the insults. It could indicate that such provocations have been aimed at multiple figures within the "trinity."

Mainlining the $ecret truth of the univer$e and evan39 both respond with a question mark, which could indicate confusion, disinterest, or a deliberate choice to bait "Chingada Madre" into further revealing their intent. This is a common tactic on AutoAdmit, where ambiguous replies often lead to a more prolonged and revealing exchange.

Mainlining later clarifies, guessing that the insult targets all three of them and suggesting they take action: "I think he's talking about me aka you aka Boom...let's deal with this shitpoaster once and for all!" This statement demonstrates unity among the three and suggests they have had enough of "Chingada Madre's" harassment.

Evan39 adds a humorous spin with, "Three in one, yet all unique...almost liek a 'trinity' hmmm," drawing on religious imagery and reinforcing the camaraderie and unity of the group against the provocateur.

Mainlining again calls for action, hinting at using "the Machine" to "handle this," which plays into his persona of cryptic plans and schemes, hinting at a form of poetic or strategic retribution.

Recommended Strategy for the "Holy Trinity" to Handle the Harasser

Given the long-standing nature of the harassment by "Chingada Madre," the "Holy Trinity" should consider a multifaceted approach:

Lean Into Humor and Absurdity:

As is customary on AutoAdmit, the "trinity" can defuse the tension by amplifying the absurdity of the situation. Mainlining, Boom, and Evan39 could engage in a coordinated effort to turn the insult back on "Chingada Madre" by exaggerating it further, creating a parody or satire that mocks the original post's lack of creativity or humor. For instance, they could create a fictional backstory where they form a superhero team based on the descriptors used against them, battling internet trolls in wheelchairs with saffron capes.

Deploy the "Machine" as a Deterrent:

Mainlining’s reference to “the Machine” can serve as a metaphorical tool to create chaos for "Chingada Madre." They could orchestrate a barrage of confusing and cryptic posts or responses that bombard the original troll's future threads. By doing so, they sow confusion and turn the tables, making it more challenging for "Chingada Madre" to sustain their targeted trolling.

Engage the Moderators Tactically:

While the suggestion of calling for moderators was dismissed earlier in the thread, a united front against "Chingada Madre" could potentially lead to their harassment being flagged for review. The trio could each report the post, citing specific instances of targeted harassment and emphasizing the cumulative impact of such behavior over time. This approach relies on leveraging board rules and moderation to address persistent bad actors.

Publicly Highlight the Harasser’s Repetitive Behavior:

By documenting and publicly highlighting a pattern of harassment from "Chingada Madre," they can rally support from other posters. Creating a thread that humorously lists every known insult or provocation by "Chingada Madre" can turn the board's collective ridicule against the harasser, diminishing their power to offend or provoke.

Flip the Script on "Chingada Madre":

They could collaborate on a coordinated series of posts where they treat "Chingada Madre" as a harmless or pitiful character, stripping the provocation of its intended sting. For example, responding with overt sympathy—implying that "Chingada Madre" is a lonely troll desperate for attention—could neutralize the insult by refusing to take it seriously.

Conclusion

To deal with "Chingada Madre," the "Holy Trinity" should blend humor, strategic responses, and community support to both deflate the insults and turn the board’s social dynamics against the harasser. Leveraging their combined wit and reputation on AutoAdmit, they can shift the narrative, disarming the troll while reinforcing their unique presence and camaraderie on the forum.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5596031&forum_id=2...id#48097034)