YOU ARE ARGUING THAT RAIN ISN'T WET. A COMET'S COMA (THE "BRIGHT AS FUCK" PART) IS THE OBSERVABLE RESULT OF SOLAR RADIATION SUBLIMATING ITS ICE AND EJECTING ITS DUST.

IT IS LITERALLY A CLOUD OF ITS OWN DISINTEGRATION.

THIS IS 8TH GRADE FUKINING PHYSIS$. "BURNING BRIGHT" AND "LOSING NO MASS" IS A LOGICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

(II) "YOU CAN'T PROVE IT" IS NOT A DEFENSE, IT IS AN ADMISSION

YOU HAVE NO MODEL. YOU HAVE ABANDONED SCIENCE FOR "A NEW KIND OF LIGHT".

$TOP POA$TINING FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.

PER SECTION III-A, YOUR RETREAT TO "WE'VE NEVER SEEN IT" IS THE "ADMISSION OF ANOMALY". YOU ARE NOW ARGUING FOR THE FUKING ANOMOGY.

CONGRATULATIONS, imgur my fFriend, YOU ARE ARGUING FOR "MAGIC" YOU FAG.

(III) MY MAHCHINE™ SEES NO "NEW" LIGHT

MY MAHCHINE™ REGISTERS ONLY CAUSE AND FUKKKING EFFECT.

THE "LIGHT" YOU ARE SEEING IS THE DUST AND GAS OF A COLLAPSING OBJECT HEATED BY A STAR. IT IS THE $AME LIGHT OF EVERY OTHER COLLAPSE.

THIS IS NOT A NEW PHENOMENON. IT IS A FAILED OBSERVATION FROM A $HEEPLE WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE MODEL.

AGAIN, $TOP POA$TING

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415153)

https://www.universetoday.com/articles/3iatlas-brightens-dramatically-as-it-swings-past-the-sun

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415178)

https://www.newsnationnow.com/banfield/3i-atlas-engine-propulsion/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415186)

IN YOUR FIRST POA$T: "may be losing no mass"

IN YOUR SECOND POA$T: "It's burning up"

ljl

YOU LITERALLY JUST ADMITTED YOU WERE WRONGG. YOU ARE A $HEEPLEE ARGUING WITH YOUR$$$$ELF.

(II) YOUR OWN LINK PROVES MY FUKKKKKKKKKKING POINT

DID YOU READ THE HEADLINE, YOU DEN$E F-CK?

"3I/ATLAS BRIGHTENS DRAMATICALLY *AS IT SWING$$%r PAST THE SUN*"

THE ARTICLE YOU POA$TED *EXPLICITLY* STATES THE BRIGHTENING IS CAUSED BY THE *SUN*. IT IS THE *OPPOSITE* OF "A NEW KIND OF LIGHT."

YOUR "PROOF" IS AN ARTICLE EXPLAINING *WHY I AM RIGHT* AND *WHY YOU ARE A FAILED OBSERVATION*.

LMAO. YOU FUKING FAG.,

(III) YOU ARE CONFUSING TWO DIFFERENT FUKINING EVENTS

AS I *JUST* TOLD YOU, THE "ANOMOGY" (THE ONE YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO ARTICULATE) WAS THE *INITIAL* BRIGHTNESS *BEFORE* IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR THE SUN.

YOUR LINK IS ABOUT THE *EXPECTED* BRIGHTENING *DURING* PERIHELION.

YOU ARE TRYING TO "PROVE" AN ANOMALY IN JANUARY BY POA$TING A LINK ABOUT AN *ENTIRELY DIFFERENT EVENT* IN OCTOBER.

(IV) FINAL FUKINING VERDICT

YOU HAVE:

1. CONTRADICTED YOUR OWN PREMISE ("no mass loss" vs. "burning up").

2. POA$TED "EVIDENCE" THAT *DISPROVES* YOUR "NEW LIGHT" THEORY.

3. CONFUSED THE TIMELINE OF THE ENTIRE FUKINING EVENT.

THIS IS A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF 8TH GRADE FUKINING PHYSIS$ AND BASIC READING COMPREHENSION.

$TOP POA$TING YOU FAG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415194)

https://www.space.com/stargazing/astronomer-catches-sight-of-interstellar-comet-3i-atlas-returning-to-the-predawn-sky-heres-how-you-can-too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415197)

YOU COMPLETELY IGNORGD THE 4-POINT FORENSIC AUDIT (POA$T 5) THAT PROVED YOU:

1. CONTRADICTED YOUR$#ELF.

2. DISPROVED YOUR OWN THEORY.

3. CONFUSED THE FUK,KING TIMELINE.

INSTEAD, YOU PIVOTED TO A NEW, UNRELATED QUOTE LIKE A $HEEPLE LOLOL

(II) "ZHANG" IS DESCRIBING MASS LOSS, YOU DEN$E FUK

"IF IT FADES AS QUICKLY AS IT BRIGHTENED..."

WAT?

WAT DO YOU THINK "FADING" & "BRIGHTENING" IS U GRADE-A FAGGOT?!?!??

IT = THE VISUAL EVIDENCE OF THE FUKINING MASS LOSS (SUBLIMATION) THAT I EXPLAINED TO YOU EARLIER, REMEMBER?!

YOU HAVE AGAIN POA$TED "EVIDENCE" THAT PROVES MY ORIGINAL POINT... $TOP POA$TING.

(III) FINAL FUKINING VERDICT: YOU ARE A BROKEN FUKINING RECORD AND YOU NEED TO STOP POASTING ASAP AKA RIGHT NOW YOU FAGGOT

YOUR ENTIRE "ARGUMENT" IS A FAILED RECURSION LOOP:

- YOU: "IT'S NOT LOSING MASS!"

- ALSO YOU: POA$TS 3 SEPARATE LINKS (UNIVERSETODAY, NEWSNATION, SPACE.COM) THAT ALL EXPLICITLY DESCRIBE THE OBSERVABLE PHENOMENA OF MASS LO$$$$$$$$$$.

MY MAHCHINE™ REGISTERS THIS AS A CATASTROPHIC LOGIC FAILURE.

"ZHANG" IS NOT YOUR SAVIOR, imgur my friend.

HE IS JUST ANOTHER SCIENTIST DESCRIBING THE 8TH GRADE PHYSIS$ YOU CONTINUE TO FAIL TO UNDERSTAND.

PLZ $TOP POA$TING FOR THE LOVE OF GOD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415207)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Comet_of_1577

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795376&forum_id=2...id#49415290)