Guy who predicted Kamala's polling lead here; shes fuct
| https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | ADVANCED darkness | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | ADVANCED darkness | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | MASE | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | MASE | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | LathamTouchedMe | 09/23/24 | | MASE | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | MASE | 09/23/24 | | a certain dog being eaten by feral haitian | 09/23/24 | | MASE | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., | 09/23/24 | | cool cope browncel | 09/23/24 | | animeboi | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 09/23/24 | | cock of michael obama | 09/23/24 | | MASE | 09/23/24 | | Trump is the Lib Killer | 09/23/24 | | Screens of Screencraft | 09/23/24 | | https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/23/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 23rd, 2024 12:13 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr
She had tremendous natural advantages I didn't expect her to squander so epically. The Oprah interview was when I knew for sure she was dun.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5600176&forum_id=2...id#48123132) |
|
Date: September 23rd, 2024 12:23 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr
I know. You have encyclopedic knowledge of the disadvantages. Just like everyone else. Congrats.
You have no idea what advantages she had though. That's why you never predicted her polling surge. You still don't know why that happened. That's why you're weak. That's why you're easy to defeat by anyone who's not as retarded as Kamala.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5600176&forum_id=2...id#48123170) |
Date: September 23rd, 2024 12:20 PM Author: MASE
There were two spikes in polling for her. One when she entered the race, leading to a massive burst in response bias as Super Democrats who finally had hope for the first time in this election cycle flooded the polls. She was polling around 99/1 with Democrats during this time and the best she could pull together with D+3-D+7 samples was a +3% on average. Second spike happened after the debate, but that one deflated much more quickly.
Could she win? Maybe. It would require levels of Democratic turnout not seen since Obama. I have seen zero metrics to suggest that.
The real truth is that the election has probably been decided since January (or June). Political Science Academics Predicted the 2016 election result to within 0.1% up to Five months prior to the election, and polling aggregations 11 months before the 2020 election. From their study:
“It seems that the leads of Biden and Clinton on Jan 31st were highly predictive for the (popular vote) final result in November. Biden won by 4.5 and Clinton won by 2.1.”
On January 1st 2024 the Real Clear Politics Aggregate stood at Trump 46.6% Biden 44.3%. This was of course long before the campaigns commenced, and the economy would have been the driving factor behind Trump’s lead at that point.
If the 2016 analysis which showed June was the deciding month the final June aggregate was Trump 46.8 Biden 44.9%
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5600176&forum_id=2...id#48123157) |
|
Date: September 23rd, 2024 12:53 PM
Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,
"would require levels of Democratic turnout not seen since Obama"
You mean BIDEN. He got 81 million votes and is the most popular POTUS of all time
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5600176&forum_id=2...id#48123304) |
Date: September 23rd, 2024 12:24 PM Author: cool cope browncel
no actual humans are voting for this person
it's all flame
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5600176&forum_id=2...id#48123175) |
|
|