marrying (procreating) a woman strictly based on phenotype the CR?
| Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 09/26/24 | | we're gonna do space force, we're doing dairy | 09/26/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 09/26/24 | | "wow" | 09/26/24 | | ,..,,,,,,....,,,..., | 09/26/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 09/26/24 | | Self-serious Macbook Airplane Girl | 09/26/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 09/26/24 | | bbq | 09/26/24 | | excellent poaster | 09/26/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 09/26/24 | | gba | 09/26/24 | | cock of michael obama | 09/26/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 26th, 2024 12:56 PM Author: ,..,,,,,,....,,,...,
Judging by the phenotypes of outted poasters and lawyers who seem like poasters, our phenotypes have lots of room to average up. Reversion to the mean would be a positive change.
On the other hand we have IQ to spare, plus nearly all attractive women seem dumb but may be carriers of high-IQ genes (eg wife has an email, nursing or teaching job while male relatives are doctors, engineers and entrepreneurs).
So I would advocate phenotype + family quality. If she seems OK but everyone else in her family is retarded and dysfunctional, watch out and don’t let phenotype fool you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5601784&forum_id=2...id#48134425) |
|
|