The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Just Watched OPPENHEIMER. Thoughts ITT
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:33 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., my main thought: this film was way overproduced/overdirected. they had a very compelling story that could have been made into a 180 film just by letting the story speak for itself, and it didn't need to be told in a mishmash order with 3 hours of constant intense feeling and drama. all this overproduction takes away from how amazing the story is itself, and it's just unnecessary. there's no reason a biopic or whatever you'd call this needs to be filmed like some memento.
that being said, it was a very exciting and engaging movie. the acting and story and raw material was all excellent. it had us on the edge of our seats for the entire 3 hours, and didn't feel too long. it was just too unnecessarily intense the whole time and needed to calm the fuck down at times. boring is good sometimes.
call me gay, but the nudity was trashy and unnecessary for a movie like this. no reason we needed to see that girl's tits out constantly. it all just makes the movie come off as degenerate jew hollywood garbage.
overall, compared to all the shitlib propaganda garbage that hollywood has been making in recent years, this movie has got to be as good as they can possibly do. it's nice to see a movie about scientists with (((white))) men heroes. if hollywood is educating the masses about this story and important piece of history, that's a good thing.
i see why it won all this acclaim given how ttt movies have been lately. but objectively, a movie like this shouldn't be best picture in any era where hollywood was producing good movies on the regular. reviews say this movie is one of the best of the 21st century; that's a sad testament to where hollywood is at now.
the movie did have undertones of hollywood jewish shitlibbery. it was obviously antiweapons and gave sympathy to the classic hollywood commie/shitlib/anti-mccarthyism schtick. but that was the reality of the movie and it told a fair story given the time. |
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:35 AM Author: average/ordinary/typical citizen/person That movie was not exciting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355166) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:39 AM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) super dramatized, to the point it felt like i was watching dr. manhattan's scientist scenes in the watchmen the entire time. really dumb movie. it was just a bunch of nerds doing science. nolan's style is not suited to biopics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355172) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:53 AM Author: UN peacekeeper your first and second paragraphs seem to be in tension with each other (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355197) |
 |
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:18 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., It’s called cheap tricks. Something can keep you on the edge of your seat and be exciting but not actually be good cinema. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355251) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:17 PM Author: butt cheeks (🍑) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356371) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:00 AM Author: 2025 Little Free Library there were poasts a year or so ago about how it showed full dong? i havent seen it and never will but is this true? i agree nudity and sex scenes are highly indicative of hollywood garbage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355214) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:17 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., There was no full or partial dong. My wife would have noticed even if I didn’t because I was focused on that mediocre girl’s small tits. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355248) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:03 AM Author: .,.,.,....., in retrospect i hardly remember it and would avoid a second watch
|
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:17 AM Author: Chingada Madre There were some tits in that film otherwise meh and last hour was dull af (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355249) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 10:03 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., The tits were meh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48355564) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 10:10 AM Author: rogue planet orbiting the SOL tbh i thought it really sucked
but there's some good material in there. some rando will prolly come out with a fan-made AI cut of oppenheimer in the next five years that's an unmitigated 180 |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:21 PM Author: ..,,.,,.,.,.,.,,.,,.,...,., I thought it sucked mostly for the reasons you said at the top of your post. The great directors can tell a narrative story from beginning to end and don’t need to rely on timeline jumps and reveals to try to make a film interesting. Apparently Nolan isn’t good enough to do that so he had to rely on cheap conventions and it’s too bad because the movie was compelling in the first hour or so when largely stuck to Oppenheimer’s beginnings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356141) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:55 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., not sure why xo hates the last hour. i think oppenheimer's moral/conscience struggle and activism after the bomb is compelling, as are the political efforts by the warmongers to shut him down. the deep state conspiracy and jew-on-jew violence between oppenheimer and strauss are certainly compelling narratives that are interesting parts of the overall story, and nolan wasn't wrong to make a big deal about them. but no reason to tell the story out of order. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356274) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:58 PM Author: Prisoner of Azkaban xo hates the last hour cause it's about narcissist butthurt strauss going after oppenheimer for petty reasons and they're that guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356292) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:02 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., all the deep state kikery shit in the strauss-oppenheimer feud is extremely relevant today and it's a very relevant story to tell (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356306) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:28 PM Author: peeface it's already forgotten. not completely woke garbage, which made it a watchable movie for 2023, but not good.
|
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:33 PM Author: ...,,,,\'\',,,\"...,,,..\" But if win the best picture Oscar didn’t it? For that reason it will always be remembered (even though it shouldn’t be because it’s otherwise a forgettable overly produced shit pure shit Nolan prestige film). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356202) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:41 PM Author: peeface i guess it is head and shoulders above all the other Best Picture winners from the last decade... most of them I've never even heard of, nevermind watched...
Spotlight Moonlight The Shape of Water Green Book Parasite Nomadland CODA Everything Everywhere All at Once
|
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:56 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., this list proves that best picture doesnt necessarily mean "it will always be remembered" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356277) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:43 PM Author: ;..;.;;;.;;.;.;.;;;.;;;.;.;;;....;. Rank this movie with the rest of Nolan's movies (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356237) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:59 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., memento, inception and dunkirk are the only other 3 ive seen. inception was total garbage. i thought memento was 180 and edgy at the time but i was young and impressionable and probably was unfairly wowed by nolan's pseudointellectual bullshit. dunkirk had its issues but was compelling and unique and had me on the edge of my seat despite a movie with no talking. i'd say memento > dunkirk > oppenheimer > inception. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356296) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:01 PM Author: ;..;.;;;.;;.;.;.;;;.;;;.;.;;;....;. Inception garbage? Jeez, you are a tough critic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356305) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:06 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., i dont like scifi shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356324) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:11 PM Author: ;..;.;;;.;;.;.;.;;;.;;;.;.;;;....;. You should watch Tenet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356354) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:13 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., doubt i would like it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356366) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:47 PM Author: ;..;.;;;.;;.;.;.;;;.;;;.;.;;;....;. You should at least give it a try (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356495) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 12:48 PM Author: Prisoner of Azkaban if Nolan wanted people to watch this, he needed the color/black and white gimmick, the timeline jump, the defeaning score, the faux dramatic moments like the cyanide apple, the weird visualizations of quantum mechanics, tits, etc. it's a Nolan movie, he makes blockbusters in IMAX. and no one would have watched a straightforward Oppenheimer biopic with nerds sitting around talking in front of a static shot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356250) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:01 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., this is a testament to our low iq society. in the past, people would watch a straightforward biopic about nerds. fuck, beautiful mind is one that comes to mind. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356302) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:04 PM Author: barnabyjones I never got why people would want to watch this movie. its about a bunch of nerds doing a science project in the desert. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356317) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:07 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., are you just trying to be provocative, or are u this much of a stupid simpleton? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356328) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:12 PM Author: Slow Children Playing iv enever seen this for this same reason. and then i understand the last third is the intricacies of administrative law, for which I could have been a consultant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356643) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:33 PM Author: OldHLSDude There's a 1980s mini-series on Oppenheimer starring Sam Watterston that is much better than the movie, IMO. Think it's on Tubi and Roku channel. Maybe elsewhere. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356425) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 1:47 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., 180. ty. all that kind of stuff is on torrents (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356489) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:13 PM Author: "'''''"'""'''"'"' It was pure Oscar bait, but entertaining enough (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2...id#48356647) |