Libs: Michael Phelps is a genetic freak, so that man should box women.
| Hyperventilating foreskin | 08/03/24 | | heady chapel coffee pot | 08/03/24 | | overrated theater | 08/03/24 | | Fuchsia police squad public bath | 08/03/24 | | misunderstood domesticated church building gaping | 08/03/24 | | Hyperventilating foreskin | 08/03/24 | | Odious kitchen famous landscape painting | 08/03/24 | | Burgundy 180 new version lodge | 08/03/24 | | irradiated disrespectful home | 08/03/24 | | Burgundy 180 new version lodge | 08/03/24 | | overrated theater | 08/03/24 | | Burgundy 180 new version lodge | 08/03/24 | | overrated theater | 08/03/24 | | Burgundy 180 new version lodge | 08/03/24 | | overrated theater | 08/03/24 | | Gay Base Pocket Flask | 08/03/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 3rd, 2024 5:11 PM Author: Gay Base Pocket Flask
Their argument is really a self-own if you think about it.
They argue that Phelps body being double jointed, proportioned the way it is, and processing lactic acid, allowed him to out perform his peers. Which is 100% true.
But none of that stuff is against the rules.
Meanwhile, one of the main rules of competing in women's boxing is that you have to be a woman.
The simple fact is the Algerian boxer's genetic advantage is that it makes her less of a woman than her competitors - which is a problem.
A better analogy would be if we separated swimmers by whether or not they were double jointed, and if Michael Phelps passed the standard double jointed test - bt was actually double jointed in a way that could be detected under a new test. Should he then be able to participate in the non-double jointed division?
Perhaps its debatable, but libs are dumbasses for saying this is obvious...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5569204&forum_id=2...id#47925145) |
|
|