The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
This lawyer deponent puts TSINAH to shame, absolute perfection (vid)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 12:51 PM Author: bossy party of the first part https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-6eynsaZ0U (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49071812) |
Date: July 4th, 2025 3:51 PM Author: bossy party of the first part TSINAH ur thoughts? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49072222) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2025 4:24 PM Author: Aggressive multi-colored mother dilemma That's nothing; anyone wanna see RT's depo video? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49072291) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 4:54 PM Author: Diverse Hissy Fit Half-breed Yes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49072372) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2025 5:08 PM Author: bossy party of the first part seen it, this one is objectively much worse than RT's behavior. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49072397) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2025 5:33 PM Author: Fishy High-end Sneaky Criminal the lawyer taking the depo is a huge faggot and ineffective and probably violating the rules just as much as the witness. he is also apparently fat and i imagine he is very much like disco fries. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49072441) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2025 5:41 PM Author: bossy party of the first part there is no way he is violating the rules as much as the deponent. are you serious?
yes he's ineffective, the better strategy would have been to keep asking the questions and let the other guy make fake objections and refuse to answer, then go to the judge. no need for him to explain why the guy needs to answer.
regardless, the lawyer being deposed had his license suspended for the conduct according to the YouTube description below the video.
looks like that might not be the only time he's been suspended too, unless there are multiple lawyers in Colorado with similar names...
https://www.coloradolegalregulation.com/wp-content/uploads/PDJ/Decisions/Abrams,%20Conditional%20Admission%20of%20Misconduct,%2020PDJ004,%2004-30-20.pdf |
|
Date: July 4th, 2025 9:02 PM Author: Fishy High-end Sneaky Criminal he asks a bunch of dumb fucking questions and compound questions that are like 6 questions at once and even tells the court reporter she isn't allowed to read an answer back. he goes on numerous diatribes/sidebars, and the deponent is correct that he should just certify his questions and move on. many of the questions he claims weren't anseered actually were, and he just didn't like the answers. he easily could have taken an effective deposition and gotten most of what he needed, then come back after a MTC and get the rest probably with attorneys fees, but he decided to have a retard slapfight over questions that weren't important and did nothing but waste everyone's time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49072891) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2025 7:44 PM Author: Aggressive multi-colored mother dilemma Never knew you was a lawyer bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49074903) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2025 7:48 PM Author: Spectacular drab base Yup (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49074911) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 2:14 PM Author: Vivacious mustard psychic this is the kind of extreme autism on here which is why people who are otherwise smart will never thrive in society. yes, he technically asked the same question, which was technically answered, multiple times. Like "have you ever had your deposition taken before?" However, in your hyper technical focus ur ignoring the fact that he was obviously lying and the person asking knew it. If you had ur depo taken before you'd remember it. the questioner probably also knew exactly how many times his depo was taken. The questioner was assessing whether this was going to be a serious depo or if the guy being deposed was just going to be a complete obstructionist even over basic questions.
this is why the person getting deposed got sanctioned and the lawyer taking it did not.
"he easily could have taken an effective deposition and gotten most of what he needed"
no obviously not. the guy wasn't answering basic questions, was objecting left and right. it wasn't even clear if he was actually pro se at certain points. the guy being deposed was obviously a lunatic who showed no interest in having his depo taken that day. the questioner rightly called him out and ended the shitshow early so he could come back and have the magistrate sit in on the deposition and also collect fees later.
|
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Fishy High-end Sneaky Criminal No offense but you seem like a huge pussy who can't handle difficult witnesses. I've never had to call a judge over, literally, my entire career and lmao @ wasting a judge's time having them sit in on some bullshit depo. I think I've only had to even file a motiin to compel based on a depo maybe twice, because there's always a way to get what you need if you're smart. If the questioner knew he had his depo taken in other cases, he should have dumped a stack of transcripts in front of him. and embarrassed him. And kept embarrassing him repeatedly to establish control. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077199) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:23 PM Author: bossy party of the first part everyone, lets clarify here, it was a magistrate judge. they are the pumos of judges. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077215) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2025 5:43 PM Author: bossy party of the first part LJL at this nugget:
"During lunch break on the second day of trial, Abrams went to opposing counsel’s office building with no legitimate reason for being in the building at that time. He rode the elevator with opposing counsel and his client (the plaintiff in the case), over objections from opposing counsel and a security guard. Abrams was disruptive to and confrontational with people in opposing counsel’s office. Based on this conduct, the trial court entered a restraining order against Abrams, listing opposing counsel as the protected party." |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 6:45 PM Author: Overrated generalized bond (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077101) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 6:49 PM Author: stirring school cafeteria Restraining order = cant own a gun. They can get it renewed indefinitely so goodbye go ever going shooting again. People need to be aware of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077110) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:01 PM Author: bossy party of the first part interesting, what in your background prompted you to investigate this rule? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077144) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:10 PM Author: stirring school cafeteria Pumo scum (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077170) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:24 PM Author: bossy party of the first part quotemo here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077217) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:00 PM Author: Lilac mad cow disease The entire deposition was a joke. That’s not how you take a depo nor is it 5D chess or any of that. It’s just dumb and incompetent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077140) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:02 PM Author: bossy party of the first part there's extreme levels of mental illness going on in that depo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077145) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 PM Author: bossy party of the first part 20 poasts in and nobody has commented on his (((name)))? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2...id#49077223) |