Is Evidence cr to take? Seems like an easy A
| Christopher's Disease | 10/22/24 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 10/22/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 10/22/24 | | VoteRepublican | 10/22/24 | | Chad Gayman | 10/22/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 10/22/24 | | McDonald Trump | 10/22/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 10/22/24 | | ZurichSTACH | 10/22/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 10/22/24 | | ZurichSTACH | 10/22/24 | | McDonald Trump | 10/22/24 | | ZurichSTACH | 10/22/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 10/22/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 10/22/24 | | Christopher's Disease | 10/22/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 10/22/24 | | Chad Gayman | 10/22/24 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 10/22/24 | | UhOh | 10/22/24 | | McDonald Trump | 10/22/24 | | OldHLSDude | 10/22/24 | | VoteRepublican | 10/22/24 | | OldHLSDude | 10/22/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 10/22/24 | | OldHLSDude | 10/22/24 | | Christopher's Disease | 10/22/24 | | McDonald Trump | 10/22/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 10/22/24 | | .;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;, | 10/22/24 | | Soren "Bob" Odenkierkegaard | 10/22/24 | | chilmata | 10/22/24 | | I Listen to Porn Podcasts | 10/22/24 | | redwood dood | 10/22/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: October 22nd, 2024 12:13 PM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
(retard who has never heard of a curve)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5615842&forum_id=2...id#48226452) |
|
Date: October 22nd, 2024 12:13 PM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
rofl no non-shitigator needs to know this bullshit. and i'm a shitigator and i didnt even take evidence in LS. you dont learn anything practical in lolschool anyway so who the fuck cares.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5615842&forum_id=2...id#48226450) |
|
Date: October 22nd, 2024 10:27 AM Author: OldHLSDude
AI Overview
The "triangular model of hearsay" is a framework for analyzing hearsay evidence created by Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe. The model is based on the idea that all testimony in court is susceptible to flaws, and that hearsay evidence is subject to two sets of flaws: those of the original declarant and those of the in-court witness.
The triangle has two sides:
Left side
The jury can't be sure if the fact was:
Clearly or ambiguously stated
Delivered with sincerity or duplicity
Right side
The out-of-court assertion is only useful if it's not the product of:
Faulty perception
Erroneous memory
The hearsay rule protects against these dangers. When attacking hearsay evidence, an opponent can use the triangle to question the in-court witness or in closing argument.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5615842&forum_id=2...id#48226033) |
|
|