The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
White Men 60-37 for TRUMP based on exit polls
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 18th, 2024 3:39 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) white dudes for Kamala explain yourselves?? You are limp wristed, you are weak. And you're Outnumbered. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48352985) |
Date: November 18th, 2024 4:08 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) Libs? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353075) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 4:10 PM Author: Paddy O'Wagon this is why i'm tired of hearing about his marginal gains with latins and negroes. whites were 71% of the electorate.
83% of votes cast for Trump were by white people.
but GOP wants to make his win about Jews, browns, blacks, and women somehow--once again. |
 |
Date: November 18th, 2024 5:17 PM Author: butt cheeks (🍑) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353299) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 5:52 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) The gains with Latinos definitely helped. The gains with blacks have to be added to blacks who would have voted Dem but stayed home and didn't. You don't always need to get someone to vote for you, but taking a vote away from your opponent is powerful. Trump's rise with blacks was like a blocked shot. There are certainly enough minorities in the blue wall to sink Republicans forever if they were motivated, but they didn't show up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353461) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:07 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) you're dumb.
in backrooms and online backrooms like xoxo it's ok to recognize the reality that the GOP is the party white people, which is a good indication it's the most sensible.
outside of that, the goal isn't to do a victory lap and potentially shoot ourselves in the foot by emphasizing how the vast majority of white people vote GOP. the reason people emphasize brown voters going GOP is because it cuts against GOP being the party of racism. the same reason every Candace owens and ben carson is venerated.
if you ask nigs why they vote democrat it's because "republicans are racist". the more this is diminished the better.
also ljl at "giving the win" to them. as if you "won." you voted. the best thing you can do to ensure more victories is to stop bitching about people emphasizing the increase in brown gop voters as some sort of personal slight. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:35 AM Author: Paddy O'Wagon you're dumb also, as if it needed saying, not white |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:46 AM Author: Respect your Elders (1799 SOL away from student loan freedom (thanks gator)) well said. i thought this was obvious to most xo poasters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354904) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:48 AM Author: Paddy O'Wagon stfu, kike stop responding to your own retarded blather |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:40 PM Author: Pumonymous Trump made yuge gains with Latino hombres. They voted for Trump almost as much as white men did. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353609) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:35 AM Author: Paddy O'Wagon (non numeric guy) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354891) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 3:03 AM Author: Pumonymous highly numeric, actually, little breh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354917) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 3:07 AM Author: Paddy O'Wagon % is not the metric.
imagine 70 million men, all descended from the men who built the country and the 'democracy' itself, all forming a human pyramid, and then 4 'hispanics' show up to take the top 4 spots on the pyramid, and everyone goes "WE COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT WITHOUT BROWN PEOPLE!! HURRAH!!"
that's your post. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 5:54 PM Author: 2025 Little Free Library but they theperate childrthen from their motherths at the border. and they want to ban gay thex. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353467) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 5:55 PM Author: "'''''"'""'''"'"' Look, you can vote for whoever you want, but if you're a white dude and you voted for Kamala, you are an absolute faggot. You're not a real man. This is not hyperbole, but objective fact (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353473) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:09 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) I give under 30 year olds a pass. so many people here voted for obama. kids are always going to be naive.
boomers are oblivious but they're responsible for that, so they go to the oven. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:15 PM Author: 2025 Little Free Library that mightve been true for millennials but xo zoomers arent having it. you dont get til 30 now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353526) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:23 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) they're waking up faster because things are worse. but im not willing to write off are lib indoctrinated gen z bluepillers as a lost cause.
if you grew up in a shitlib bubble and go to a shitlib LAC it might take quite a while to see the light. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:34 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) I've talked to a lot of Zoomers about politics. They seem to have never been exposed to the core concepts of conservatism. Their basic outlook is Republicans bad, Democrats good. It's sad. They have no education. They're painfully dumb but not intentionally so. One Zoomer told me that he believed Democrats were for feeding the world and Republicans were against it. It's really that bad. But the problem is lack of education. There have never been more tools to get people to wake up. In the Obama era none of this free speech online community stuff existed and you never heard about conservatism in public. Now it's out in the open. Ultimately the internet benefits Republicans in the long run. People hit 30 and they start to turn. Most conservative age group is 45-64. It's only boomers and the youth who are lib right now. As Boomers die Gen X will be more conservative when they are seniors. Good things are happening. 1488 is a pipe dream but anyone on the right who doesn't think Trump 2024 is a yuge victory is simply pathetic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353585) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:37 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) what, yes it did.
you just grew up and moved to shitlib areas. these people are no different than how you were when you voted obama. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:38 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) There is probably some truth to that I did grow up in a liberal bubble but come on the Overton window has completely shifted. Elon was a blue pilled faggot in Obama years. Everything has fundamentally changed. There were no young, cool, hip people for McCain and Romney. No one in the Zeitgeist. GOP was all whispers then. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353599) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:42 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) yeah, for your age bracket. because you experienced the same awakening many of them will have.
in the bush era dixie chicks were getting canceled. now it's trump and other GOP people. conservatism wasn't spoken in hushed tones in the aughts. it was far more on the open. they banned trump from twitter. that would never have happened to bush.
things are swinging back to normal but this whole "don't admit you're conservative" hushed tone shit started recently. things were far less divisive before and there was plenty of access to information. this greatbort was founded in 2004. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 7:26 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) Bush had a great relationship with the New York Times. It was a different era. Also, neocons weren't really conservative. They were economic liberals who pressed very gently on conservative values without ever putting their balls on the table. This is why they have such a bad reputation today. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353797) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 7:33 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) "In the Obama era none of this free speech online community stuff existed and you never heard about conservatism in public"
i'm talking about this. there weren't any "shy romney" voters in 2012. and the internet, including this website, was in full swing before anyone even heard of obama.
all i'm saying is that an 18 year old kamala voter today isn't that different from an 18 year old obama voter in 2008. it's still *far* more socially unacceptable to be a trump voter in 2024 than a romney voter in 2012 or a gop voter in any other time in history. there was no 4B movement were women were pledging to not fuck anymore because they were so MAF about romney.
give the zoomers a break. they're living under more repressive conditions than you and being indoctrinated way harder. GOP has always sought converts while libs seek heretics. have some hope for 18 year old shitheads that have lived in the bay area their whole life. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 7:50 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) Trump voters didn't exist in 2012. The rurals were not politically engaged.
Also imagine the Palo Alto denizens 20 years from now. It will be the same looney toon polisci shitheads exclaiming from their 2.5mm shitbox in the valley: "I was raised middle class." |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 9:01 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) this isn't responsive to anything i wrote.
you said in the obama era you never heard about conservativism in public. not true, you heard it more than today. the "rural voters weren't engaged" is bullshit too. i was a representative to my state's gop convention in 2010 and throughout the obama administration. the tea party rural conservatives were VERY engaged. it was kind of a big thing.
i mentioned "shy voters" because that reflects reluctance to speak about conservative political views publicly. the reason there weren't shy romney voters is because people weren't reluctant to discuss conservative politics. the reason there are shy trump voters is because saying you're a trumpmo to a shitlib makes their head catch on fire. this did not happen in the obama era. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 9:11 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) This is just historically inaccurate. I'm not disputing that the Tea Party didn't exist. I'm saying it simply wasn't very popular. It sewed the seeds of MAGA but before Trump came down to escalator it was fringe. You may be thinking it was bigger than it was due to your involvement in state politics. You saw these people in real life. But all you need to do is compare 2012 and 2016 voting trends. The rurals simply did not turn out for Romney in 2012. 4 years later Trump was winning rural counties by margins the Romney campaign never thought possible. This is easily measured historical fact. You can pull this up on Wikipedia in two seconds. No one besides a few die hards and the curious media even knew about the Tea Party or the origin of the America First movement. Before Trump did it, it wasn't on the map. Trump made it ok for normies to join the team. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354261) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 9:40 PM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) again, this is nonresponsive.
1) we're talking about "speaking about conservatism in public during the obama era."
2) the rural voter thing was a non-sequitur you brought up, and i made a mistake addressing it at all because now you're focusing on that exclusively, but still non-responsively. voter turnout =/= engagement. rural voters were very engaged in 2012. the didn't turn out because neither candidate was on their side. this is like you saying communists who spend 24/7 engaging in politics irl aren't "engaged" because they don't vote when no candidate represents their values. |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 9:58 PM Author: 45 & 47 (jacked up and good to go) (Andrew Breitbart) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354380) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:54 AM Author: ;..;.;;;.;;.;.;.;;;.;;;.;.;;;....;. I know many millennials and Gen X who still think Democrats want to feed the world and Republicans are evil people. As you get older and have kids, you don't have time to read twitter or listen to podcasts, you get your news from Google or Apple push notifications (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354910) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:09 PM Author: Bronus Swagner Should be 80-20, considering fags and (((fellow whites))) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48353510) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 6:31 PM Author: peeface sorry, it is definitionally 100-0 for Trump among men.
casting a ballot for Dems is the one gender transition process i genuinely accept.
|
|
Date: November 18th, 2024 9:12 PM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) bitch bois shouldn't even be allowed to vote (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636393&forum_id=2...id#48354269) |