The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Will you watch my CA9 argument next week? "Swinging dicks" judge on panel (epah)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 1st, 2026 11:44 PM Author: appetizing institution Next Tuesday at 9:00 PDT One of my judges is this fellow: https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5845118&mc=6&forum_id=2#top |
Date: June 1st, 2026 11:45 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49910820) |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2026 6:52 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station what's it about, your fee award on trendsettah or some robinson patman act stuff (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49911719) |
 |
Date: June 5th, 2026 4:19 PM Author: appetizing institution Whether the UK company that owns OnlyFans is subject to personal jurisdiction in CA.
(We've sued them under CA's Automatic Renewal Law for automatically renewing "Fans'" subscriptions to "Creators" without disclosing that it'll be a recurring charge. Our kindly elderly judge determined that they're not subject to Jx in CA because they hadn't "specifically targeted" California consumers) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2026 4:24 PM Author: excitant fear-inspiring messiness home Lol jfc. Are there still open questions like *that* on internet minimum contacts? Just set up your site to not allow California IP addresses, like how when I take depos in red states now I have to use my imagination to jerk off because porn sites want my DL and birth certificate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49917027) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2026 4:30 PM Author: appetizing institution It's not *actually an open question, it's just a kindly elderly judge who assumed that Orrick biglolyers probably know a lot about jurisdiction, so we should do what they say. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49917032) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 1:58 PM Author: chocolate jew Are you going after the "creators" individually? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925493) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 3:23 PM Author: appetizing institution The Creators did nothing wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925689) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 8:24 PM Author: excitant fear-inspiring messiness home Might be the one time in history that class members would prefer an in-kind suck-n-fuck coupon settlement over whatever nominal $$ they'd otherwise get. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49926483) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2026 9:59 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49917746) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:11 PM Author: appetizing institution This is tomorrow guys FYI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49923044) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:18 PM Author: Bat Shit Crazy Up-to-no-good Temple Hairy Legs I will jump on as soon as my property tax protest hearing is over. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49923058) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:19 PM Author: appetizing institution Thanks man. First argument, and only 10 mins/side, so we'll be pau by 9:30 at the latest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49923061) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:13 PM Author: razzle-dazzle school cafeteria Orrick v EPAH
Get your bets in now |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:15 PM Author: appetizing institution epah by a mile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49923052) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 8:36 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station you've been litigating this since 2022? i didn't even realize onlyfans has been around that long - i guess it pays to be an early adopter (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49924087) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 8:41 PM Author: appetizing institution Lol, yeah. Our SOL goes back to summer 2018. By the time of judgment it's going to be 10 years of all auto-renewals in CA. It'll be well over $1B by then. Unfortunately our only claim is under the UCL so it'll be a judge deciding, and obv he'll think of some way to pare it down, like perhaps to only the first renewal, and then say, "the user should have reviewed his cc statement and known better." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49924117) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 8:46 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49924129) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 12:27 PM Author: Bat Shit Crazy Up-to-no-good Temple Hairy Legs Tremendous lawyering. I have not thought about such personal jurisdiction issues in years and the deep analysis was both majestic and scholarly. I also thought that your short rebuttal that put the focus back on the subsequent conduct of the Defendant was superb. Laser focused. You came back into the ring like Mike Tyson and dropped the mic on that nerd lawyer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925237) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 12:43 PM Author: appetizing institution Lol thanks man. I’m now a little embarrassed to have even posted it, it was so uneventful (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925288) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 12:45 PM Author: Bat Shit Crazy Up-to-no-good Temple Hairy Legs You did good. You had the better argument. How long are you staying in SF for? I wish I was in SF today. It's hot as fuck here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925300) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 1:46 PM Author: appetizing institution It’s beautiful and 66 here rn but I’m headed back to the airport (after coming in at 6:00 on a redeye). Can’t stand to be away from HI even for a minute. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925471) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 7:52 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station great report, sorry i missed it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49926434) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 1:59 PM Author: chocolate jew What are damages like in Onlyfans-recurring-charges litigation? Do plaintiffs have a duty to mitigate? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925494) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 3:26 PM Author: appetizing institution On its face it's just restitution of the "unlawful" charges. We have Judge Breyer who is supposed to be unafraid of nuclear judgments, so we'll see what unfolds (there's surprisingly little caselaw as to whether at some point the consumer is required to review their charges and unsubscribe -- perhaps especially once they've first realized how it works) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49925699) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 7:56 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49926437) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 8:00 PM Author: chocolate jew This isn't the most sympathetic class of plaintiffs though. What other remedies are available? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49926443) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 8:58 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station fraud is fraud (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49926552) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 9:08 PM Author: appetizing institution The money has to go somewhere. It’d be weird for a person taking that moral view to conclude that it’s better for the pornographer to keep it than to give it back to the lonely masturbators and shut-ins. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49926576) |
|
Date: June 28th, 2026 12:08 AM Author: appetizing institution Just rewatched this. And realized that the case will likely be decided by the height transition from 18:16 to 18:30: https://youtu.be/V3P2ZxZwI9E?t=1096
Esp at 19:11, when the video guy is like, "whoa, this is a Tall Man," and has to adjust the camera.
Basically game over. |
|
Date: June 28th, 2026 12:13 AM Author: carmine tattoo fortuitous meteor That Tall Man is Cr and 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49966679) |
|
Date: June 30th, 2026 10:53 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station honestly i believe your scholarship carried the day here before you even need to get to height, lol at that dude's argument that there's no onlyfans contact/aiming/directing to california (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49972710) |
|
Date: June 30th, 2026 2:40 PM Author: appetizing institution Big surprise; we won.
Height-of-lawyer theory remains undefeated. |
|
Date: June 30th, 2026 10:38 PM Author: carmine tattoo fortuitous meteor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49972680) |
|
Date: June 30th, 2026 11:03 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station congrats. what happens next in the case, is there a pile of money as damages yet or is that the next step (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49972728) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2026 2:33 PM Author: appetizing institution This is just to establish that OF is subject to jurisdiction in CA. They've since changed their subscription process to more-or-less comply with the law, but there should still be tens of million$ in illegal charge$ that we can have refunded to the victims (minus 25% + costs). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49973861) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2026 7:21 PM Author: Charismatic know-it-all half-breed station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2...id#49974508) |
|
Date: August 13th, 2026 8:12 PM Author: N904PD EPAH represents the Simps
Hagens Berman represents the Creators. That’s the difference
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.1033777/gov.uscourts.cacd.1033777.1.0_1.pdf |