XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| racy costumed knife | 07/04/25 | | Hateful Irate Area | 07/04/25 | | self-centered jade shrine | 07/04/25 | | henna double fault garrison | 07/04/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/04/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/04/25 | | Hateful Irate Area | 07/04/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/04/25 | | Hateful Irate Area | 07/04/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/04/25 | | Hateful Irate Area | 07/05/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/05/25 | | cobalt crackhouse rigpig | 07/05/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/06/25 | | cobalt crackhouse rigpig | 07/05/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/05/25 | | cobalt crackhouse rigpig | 07/06/25 | | Flatulent confused dysfunction | 07/06/25 | | Violent scourge upon the earth | 07/05/25 | | erotic cracking pocket flask site | 07/06/25 | | Violent scourge upon the earth | 07/06/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/06/25 | | Violent scourge upon the earth | 07/06/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/06/25 | | Painfully honest field blood rage | 07/05/25 | | fear-inspiring twinkling ladyboy international law enforcement agency | 07/06/25 | | brindle marketing idea indian lodge | 07/05/25 | | pale mother brunch | 07/06/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/06/25 | | Domesticated dopamine cumskin | 07/06/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/06/25 | | jet-lagged orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/06/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/06/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/06/25 | | Flatulent confused dysfunction | 07/06/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/06/25 | | erotic cracking pocket flask site | 07/06/25 | | racy costumed knife | 07/06/25 | | Domesticated dopamine cumskin | 07/06/25 | | fear-inspiring twinkling ladyboy international law enforcement agency | 07/06/25 | | Shaky Headpube | 07/06/25 | | Cerebral khaki patrolman office | 07/06/25 | | Arrogant Aromatic Business Firm | 07/06/25 | | comical crystalline fanboi | 07/06/25 | | Arrogant Aromatic Business Firm | 07/06/25 | | Unhinged parlour | 07/06/25 | | Violent scourge upon the earth | 07/06/25 | | Irradiated goal in life milk | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Shaky Headpube
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Shaky Headpube
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Shaky Headpube
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Shaky Headpube
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: pale mother brunch
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Flatulent confused dysfunction
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: fear-inspiring twinkling ladyboy international law enforcement agency
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id#49076800) |
|
|